Page images
PDF
EPUB

ESSAY XIII.

PRIESTS AND WOMEN.

PART I.-SYMPATHY.

WOMEN hate the inexorable. They like a condition of things in which nothing is so surely fixed but that the rule may be broken in their favour, or the hard decision reversed. They like concession for concession's sake, even when the matter is of slight importance. A woman will ask a favour from a person in authority when a man will shrink from the attempt, and if the woman gains her point by entreaty she will have a keen and peculiar feminine satisfaction in having successfully exercised what she feels to be her own especial power, to which the strong rough creature, man, may often be made to yield. A woman will go forth on the most hopeless errands of intercession and persuasion, and, in spite of the most adverse circumstances, will not unfrequently succeed. Scott made admirable use of this feminine tendency in the Heart of Mid-Lothian; Jeannie Deans, with a woman's feelings and perseverance, had a woman's reliance on her own persuasive powers, and the result proved that she was right. All things in a woman combine to make her mighty in persuasion. Her very weakness aids her, she can assume a pitiful, child-like tender

ness.

Her ignorance aids her, as she seems never to know that a decision can be fixed and final; then she has tears, and besides these pathetic influences she has generally some magnetism of sex, some charm or attraction, at least, in voice or manner, and sometimes she has that marvellous, that all but irresistible gift of beauty which has ruled and ruined the masters of the world.

Having constantly used these powers of persuasion with the strongest being on this planet, and used them with such wonderful success that it is even now doubtful whether the occult feminine government is not mightier than the open masculine government, whilst it is not a matter of doubt at all, but of assured fact, that society is ruled by queens and ladies, and not by kings and lords; with all these evidences of their influence in this world, it is intelligible that women should willingly listen to those who tell them that they have similar influence over supernatural powers, and, through them, on the destinies of the universe. Far less willingly would they listen to some hard scientific teacher who should say, "No, you have no influence beyond this planet, and that which you exercise upon its surface is limited by the force that you are able to set in motion. The Empress Eugénie had no supernatural influence through the Virgin Mary, but she had great and dangerous natural influence through her husband, and it may be true, what is asserted, that she caused in this way a disastrous war." An exclusively originating Intelligence, acting at the beginning of evolution-a setter-in-motion of a prodigious self-acting machinery of cause producing effect, and effects in their turn becoming a new complexity of causes -an Intelligence that we cannot persuade because we

are born millions of years too late for the first impulse that started all things-this may be the god of the future, but it will be a distant future before the world of women will acknowledge him.

There is another element in the feminine nature that urges women in the same direction. They have a constant sense of dependence in a degree hardly ever experienced by men except in debilitating illness, and as this sense of dependence is continual with them and only occasional with us, it becomes, from habit, inseparable from their mental action, whereas even in sickness a man looks forward to the time when he will act again freely for himself. Men choose a course of action, women choose an adviser. They feel themselves unable to continue the long conflict without help, and, in spite of their great patience and courage, they are easily saddened by solitude, and in their distress of mind they feel an imperious need for support and consolation. "Our valours are our best gods" is a purely masculine sentiment, and to a woman such self-reliance seems scarcely distinguishable from impiety. The feminine counterpart of that would be, "In our weakness we seek refuge in Thy strength, O Lord!"

A woman is not satisfied with merely getting a small share in a vast bounty for the general good; she is kind and affectionate herself; she is personally attentive to the wants of children and animals, and cares for each of them separately; and she desires to be cared for in the same way. The philosopher does not give her any assurance of this whatever; but the priest, on the contrary, gives it in the most positive form. It is not merely one of the doctrines of religion, but the central doctrine,

the motive for all religious exercises, that God cares for every one of us individually, that he knows Jane Smith by name, and what she is earning a week, and how much of it she devotes to keeping her poor paralysed old mother. The philosopher says, "If you are prudent and skilful in your conformity to the laws of life you will probably secure that amount of mental and physical satisfaction which is attainable by a person of your organisation." There is nothing in this about personal interest or affection; it is a bare statement of natural cause and consequence. The priest holds a very different language; the use of the one word love gives warmth and colour to his discourse. The priest says, "If you love God with all your soul and with all your strength, He will love and cherish you in return, and be your own true and tender Father. He will watch over every detail and every minute of your existence, guard you from all real evil, and at last, when this earthly pilgrimage shall be over, He will welcome you in His eternal kingdom." But this is not all. God may still seem at too unapproachable a distance. The priest then says that means have been divinely appointed to bridge over that vast abyss. "The Father has given us the Son, and Christ has instituted the Church, and the Church has appointed me as her representative in this place-me, to whom you may come always for guidance and consolation that will never be refused you."

This is the language for which the ears of a woman thirst as parched flowers thirst for the summer rain. Instead of a great blank universe, with fixed laws interesting to savants but not to her, she is told of love and affection that she thoroughly understands. She is told of an

affectionate Creator, of His beloved and loving Son, of the tender care of the maternal Church that He instituted, and finally all this chain of affectionate interest ends close to her in a living link-a man with soft engaging manners, with kind and gentle voice, who takes her hand, talks to her about all that she really cares for, and overflows with the readiest sympathy for all her anxieties. This man is so different from common men, so very much better and purer, and, above all, so much more accessible, communicative, and consolatory! He seems to have had so much spiritual experience, to know so well what trouble and sorrow are, to sympathise so completely with the troubles and sorrows of a woman! With him the burden of life is ten times easier to bear, without his precious fellowship that burden would be heavy indeed!

It may be objected to this that the clergy do not entirely teach a religion of love, that, in fact, they curse as well as bless, and foretell eternal punishment for the majority. All this, it may be thought, must be as painful to the feelings of women as Divine kindness and human felicity must be agreeable to them. Whoever made this objection would show that he had not quite understood the feminine nature. It is at the same time kinder and tenderer than the masculine nature, and more absolute in vindictiveness. Women do not generally like the infliction of pain that they believe to be undeserved;1 they are not generally advocates for vivisection, but as their feelings of indignation against evil

1 The word "generally" is inserted here because women do, apparently, sometimes enjoy the infliction of undeserved pain on other creatures. They grace bull-fights with their presence, and

« PreviousContinue »