Fiscal Balance in the American Federal System: A Commission Report, Volumes 1-2U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968 - Finance, Public |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 65
Page 21
... Virginia , Minnesota , Michigan , West Virginia and Indiana have adopted the " second " tax , while Nebraska adopted an integrated revenue package -- both a general sales and a personal income tax . Except for Indiana , Michigan and ...
... Virginia , Minnesota , Michigan , West Virginia and Indiana have adopted the " second " tax , while Nebraska adopted an integrated revenue package -- both a general sales and a personal income tax . Except for Indiana , Michigan and ...
Page 72
... Virginia this form of local government is completely absent . In Hawaii , public education is State administered , and in the other three States it is a county and municipal function . In about half of the States where inde- pendent ...
... Virginia this form of local government is completely absent . In Hawaii , public education is State administered , and in the other three States it is a county and municipal function . In about half of the States where inde- pendent ...
Page 73
... Virginia and West Virginia , build and maintain local roads ; others like New Jersey leave this function entirely to the localities . The fact that the performance of certain functions is assigned to local governments in some States ...
... Virginia and West Virginia , build and maintain local roads ; others like New Jersey leave this function entirely to the localities . The fact that the performance of certain functions is assigned to local governments in some States ...
Page 79
... Virginia 8.5 7.9 83.3 92,9 -10.3 West Virginia 9.8 7.7 96.1 90.6 6.1 Kentucky 9.1 7.7 89.2 90.6 - 1.5 Tennessee 9.2 8.5 90.2 100.0 -9.8 North Carolina 9.8 8.4 96.1 98.8 -2.7 South Carolina 9.4 8.9 92.2 104.7 -11.9 Georgia 9.3 8.6 91.2 ...
... Virginia 8.5 7.9 83.3 92,9 -10.3 West Virginia 9.8 7.7 96.1 90.6 6.1 Kentucky 9.1 7.7 89.2 90.6 - 1.5 Tennessee 9.2 8.5 90.2 100.0 -9.8 North Carolina 9.8 8.4 96.1 98.8 -2.7 South Carolina 9.4 8.9 92.2 104.7 -11.9 Georgia 9.3 8.6 91.2 ...
Page 84
... Virginia 1.9 0.9 112 69 64 West Virginia 0.8 108 0.6 47 113 43 Kentucky 1.4 110 0.7 82 115 50 Tennessee 1126 / 1.2 117 86 North Carolina 2.1 102 0.7 124 106 50 South Carolina 1.5 114 0.5 88 119 36 Georgia 1.1 119 0.8 65 124 57 Florida ...
... Virginia 1.9 0.9 112 69 64 West Virginia 0.8 108 0.6 47 113 43 Kentucky 1.4 110 0.7 82 115 50 Tennessee 1126 / 1.2 117 86 North Carolina 2.1 102 0.7 124 106 50 South Carolina 1.5 114 0.5 88 119 36 Georgia 1.1 119 0.8 65 124 57 Florida ...
Contents
24 | |
30 | |
44 | |
51 | |
52 | |
60 | |
61 | |
62 | |
67 | |
87 | |
91 | |
93 | |
96 | |
99 | |
101 | |
102 | |
112 | |
115 | |
123 | |
126 | |
130 | |
132 | |
137 | |
139 | |
141 | |
146 | |
150 | |
156 | |
157 | |
166 | |
167 | |
175 | |
178 | |
184 | |
191 | |
199 | |
204 | |
214 | |
216 | |
221 | |
227 | |
235 | |
236 | |
248 | |
251 | |
260 | |
268 | |
271 | |
274 | |
295 | |
301 | |
316 | |
vi | |
17 | |
19 | |
23 | |
25 | |
27 | |
35 | |
36 | |
37 | |
46 | |
55 | |
58 | |
62 | |
69 | |
71 | |
79 | |
87 | |
115 | |
131 | |
132 | |
133 | |
135 | |
136 | |
139 | |
142 | |
145 | |
146 | |
148 | |
149 | |
152 | |
153 | |
154 | |
157 | |
159 | |
168 | |
181 | |
182 | |
231 | |
237 | |
244 | |
261 | |
268 | |
279 | |
289 | |
296 | |
335 | |
348 | |
351 | |
359 | |
362 | |
370 | |
377 | |
387 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
ACIR administrative Alaska amount areawide assistance auditing authority billion Budget capita categorical grants Census central city Commission recommends Committee Congress coordination Department distribution districts economic Education and Welfare effective enacted established executive expenditure facilities Federal agencies Federal aid Federal Government Federal grant Federal grants-in-aid federal system financing fiscal fiscal federalism formula functional funds governmental Governor grant-in-aid grant-in-aid programs Hawaii Health highway increase Intergovernmental Relations interstate jurisdictions legislative legislature low income major matching ratios ment metropolitan areas Minnesota Nebraska North Carolina Office payments percent personal income tax planning requirements political President problems project grants property tax recipients regional responsibility revenue Rhode Island role sales tax share Source South Dakota specific staff State-local Table tax credit tax effort Tax Foundation tax rates tax relief tion U.S. Bureau U.S. Congress United Urban Development urban renewal Washington West Virginia Wisconsin
Popular passages
Page 183 - Representatives shall exercise continuous watchfulness of the execution by the administrative agencies concerned of any laws, the subject matter of which is within the jurisdiction of such committee; and, for that purpose, shall study all pertinent reports and data submitted to the Congress by the agencies in the executive branch of the Government.
Page 256 - Southeast Virginia West Virginia Kentucky Tennessee North Carolina South Carolina Georgia Florida Alabama Mississippi Louisiana Arkansas Southwest Oklahoma Texas...
Page 347 - State and local governments for the consideration of common problems; "(2) provide a forum for discussing the administration and coordination of Federal grant and other programs requiring intergovernmental cooperation; "(3) give critical attention to the conditions and controls involved in the administration of Federal grant programs; "(4) make available technical assistance to the executive and legislative branches of the Federal Government in the review of proposed legislation to determine its...
Page xv - State, and local governments for the consideration of common problems ; (2) provide a forum for discussing the administration and coordination of Federal grant and other programs requiring intergovernmental cooperation; (3) give critical attention to the conditions and controls involved in the administration of Federal grant programs ; (4) make available technical assistance to the executive and legislative branches of the Federal Government in the review of proposed legislation to determine its...
Page 267 - Southeast: Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas. Plains: Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas.
Page 347 - Commission, in the performance of its duties, will — (1) bring together representatives of the Federal, State, and local governments for the consideration of common problems ; (2) provide a forum for discussing the administration and 73 STAT. coordination of Federal grant and other programs requiring intergovernmental cooperation ; (3) give critical attention to the conditions and controls involved in the administration of Federal grant programs; (4) make available technical assistance...
Page 185 - Office was created to assist the Congress in providing legislative control over the receipt, disbursement, and application of public funds. Its principal functions are in the fields of auditing, accounting, claims settlement, legal decisions, special assistance to the Congress, and records management and services.
Page 109 - NEW JERSEY NEW MEXICO NEW YORK N. CAROLINA N. DAKOTA OHIO OKLAHOMA OREGON PENNSYLVANIA RHODE ISLAND S. CAROLINA S. DAKOTA TENNESSEE TEXAS UTAH VERMONT VIRGINIA WASHINGTON W.
Page 166 - Certain planning requirements necessarily demanded as a condition of grants may be overlapping. This duplication can defeat the very purpose for which planning is sought. Such requirements may themselves become a significant generator of confusion, and have an adverse effect on program policy and execution.33 Too many programs had been passed too fast for anyone to keep up.
Page 8 - Nation's prime revenue source-the personal income tax. Responds to need for equalization. Revenue sharing would operate in the right direction from the standpoint of interstate equalization and could be adjusted to serve as a powerful equalization instrument below the State level. A per capita distribution formula alone produces a moderate degree of equalization between wealthy and poor States, at the same time providing the most aid to the most populous States. Still more equalization can be built...