CHAPTER 5 (Cont'd) 116/ Creative Federalism, Parts 2A and 2B, op. cit., pp. 639-739. 117/ William H. Young, "The Development of the Governorship," State Government, XXXI, 178 (December, 1958). 118/ Karl A. Bosworth and James W. Fesler, "Legislators and Governors," The Fifty States and Their Local Governments, James W. Fesler, Editor (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1967), p. 291. 119/ State Expenditure Controls: An Evaluation (New York: Inc., 1965), p. 80. Tax Foundation, 120/ See Joseph A. Schlesinger, "The Politics of the Executive," Politics in the American States, Herbert Jacob and Kenneth N. Vines, Editors (Boston, Massachusetts: Little, Brown and Co., 1965), pp. 222-24, for a similar comparative rating of gubernatorial appointive powers. 121/ York Willbern, "Administrative Organization," The Fifty States and Their Local Governments, Editor, James W. Fesler (New York, Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1967), p. 341. 122/ Willbern, op. cit., pp. 346-53. 123/ Schlesinger, op. cit., p. 227. 124/ The elements of strong veto provisions are adapted from an article by F. W. Prescott, "The Executive Veto in the American States," Western Political Quarterly, III, 98-112, 1950. 125/ Schlesinger, op. cit., p. 227. 126/ Willbern, op. cit., p. 293. 127/ Schlesinger, op. cit., p. 219. 128/ Council of State Governments, Budgeting by States (Chicago, 1967), pp. 3-5. 129/ Karl A. Bosworth, "The Politics of Management Improvement in the States," American Political Science Review, XLVII, No. 1, 1953, p. 97. 130/ Lynn W. Eley, "The Executive Reorganization Plan: A Survey of State Experience," Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California (Berkeley, California: January, 1967), p. 26. Massachusetts executive reorganization power was authorized by voters in November 1966. See State Government News, December, 1966, p. 3. 131/ David K. Hartley, "Organizational Arrangements for State Planning," a Report to the Office of Regional Development (Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Planners, January, 1967), 29 pages (processed). 132/ Schlesinger, op. cit., p. 231. 133/ CHAPTER 5 (Cont'd) Deil S. Wright, "Executive Leadership in State Administration," Midwest Journal of Political Science. Volume XI, No. 1 (Detroit: Midwest Conference of Political Scientists, February, 1967), pp. 1-26. 134/ John C. Wahlke, "Organization and Procedure," State Legislatures in American Politics (New York: The American Assembly, 1966), p. 131. 135/ Council of State Governments, American State Legislatures: and Procedures (Chicago, 1967), pp. 22-23. Their Structure 136/ Calvin W. Clark, A Survey of Legislative Services in the Fifty States (Citizens Conference on State Legislatures, April 1967), Table 13, pp. 53-54. On the other hand an unpublished report by the same group showed that 137/ Clark, op. cit., pp. 39-49. 138/ Council of State Governments, Report of the Committee on Organization of Legislative Services of the National Legislative Conference (Chicago 1963), PP. 34-37. 139/ Creative Federalism, Part 2A, op. cit., p. 653. 140/ Ibid., Part I, p. 94. 141/ ACIR, Impact of Federal Urban Development Programs, op. cit. 142/ Municipal Year Book, 1965 (Chicago: tion, 1965), p. 315. International City Managers' Associa 143/ American Institute of Planners, "Survey of Areawide Planning Agencies, October 1966" (Washington, D.C.: May, 1967), multilith draft. 144/ International City Managers' Association, Municipal Information Service Report No. 278, Organization and Procedures for Participation in Federal Grant Programs, to be published in 1967. 145/ Reported in Municipal Development Departments, Planning Advisory Service, Information Report No. 189 (Chicago, Ill.: American Society of Planning Officials, August, 1964). 146/ ACIR, Impact of Federal Urban Development Programs, op. cit. 147/ An earlier Advisory Commission report, The Problem of Special Districts in American Government, May, 1964, examined this problem. A COMMISSION REPORT FISCAL BALANCE IN THE AMERICAN FEDERAL SYSTEM VOL. 2 METROPOLITAN FISCAL DISPARITIES U.S. ADVISORY COMMISSION ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS OCTOBER 1967 A-31 The financing of this volume has been provided in part by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. HJ 275 A5116 1967 V.2 In every city the people are divided into three sorts; the very rich, the very poor and those who are between them. . The most perfect political community must be amongst those who are in the middle rank, and those states are best instituted wherein these are a large and more respectable part, if possible, than both the other; or, if that cannot be, at least than either of them separate; so that being thrown into the balance it may prevent either scale from preponderating. - Aristotle, Politics, Book IV, Chapter XI, For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $2.25 |