22/ P.L. 89-10, Sec. 204.

CHAPTER 5 (Cont'd)

23/ U.S. Congress, House Committee on Education and Labor, Elementary and Secondary Education Amendments of 1966, Report No. 1814, 89th Cong., 2d Sess., (Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966), p. 8.

24/ 42 U.S.C, 2507.

25/ P.L. 89-136.

26/ P.L. 89-4.

27/ P.L. 88-452.

28/ P.L. 89-754.

29/ 42 U.S.C. 2541-2546.

30/ P.L. 89-73.

31/ Gilbert and Smith, op. cit., p. 1.

32/ Gilbert and Smith, op. cit., p. 6.

33/ Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Impact on Federal Urban Development Programs on Local Government Organization and Planning (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1964, pp. 13-15.

34/ Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Intergovernmental Relations in the Poverty Program (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966), p. 38.

35/ U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Government Operations, Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Relations, The Federal System as Seen by State and Local Officials, 88th Cong., 1st Sess. (Washington, D.C.: Committee Print, 1963), PP. 44-45.

36/ Creative Federalism, Part I, op. cit., p. 93.

371 See U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Government Operations, Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Relations, The Federal System as Seen by Federal Aid Officials, Committee Print, 89th Cong., 1st Sess., 1965, p. 46.

38/ The Council of State Governments, State Government Organization and Federal Grant-in-Aid Program Requirements, a Report to the Governors' Conference, Hershey, Pennsylvania, July 1-4, 1962 (Chicago, 1962), pp. 11-12.

39/ U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Government Operations, Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Relations, Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1965, Hearings, 89th Cong., 1st Sess., 1965, p. 63.

CHAPTER 5 (Cont'd)

40/ Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Statutory and Administrative Controls Associated with Federal Grants for Public Assistance (Washington, 1964), p. 96.

41/ S. 698; H.R. 5522 and associated bills.

42/

The Federal System as Seen by State and Local Officials, op. cit., p. 49.

43/ Ibid., p. 55.

44/ Ibid., p. 55.

45/ Ibid., p. 57.

46/ The Federal System as Seen by Federal Aid Officials, op. cit., pp. 23 ff.

47/ Ibid., p. 33.

48/ Ibid., p. 33.

49/ President's Memorandum to Heads of Certain Federal Agencies on Advice and Consultation with State and Local Officials, November 11, 1966, Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, November 21, 1966, pp. 1685-6.

50/

Bureau of the Budget, Circular A-85, Consultation With Heads of State and
Local Governments in Development of Federal Rules, Regulations, Standards,
Procedures, and Guidelines, June 28, 1967.

51/ U.S. Congress, House, Quality of American Government, Message from the President of the United States, House Document No. 90, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, March 20, 1967), p. 10.

52/ ACIR, Impact of Federal Urban Development Programs, op. cit.

56/ Memorandum from the President Requesting Coordination at the Federal Level, September 2, 1966, Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, September 5, 1966, p. 1195.

57/ Bureau of the Budget, Circular A-80, Coordination of Development Planning for Programs Based on Multijurisdictional Areas, January 31, 1967.

58/ Creative Federalism, Part I, op. cit., p. 381.

59/ Quality of American Government, op cit., p. 10. 60/

Creative Federalism, Part I, op. cit., p. 398.

61/

CHAPTER 5 (Cont'd)

Commission on Organization of the Executive Branch of the Government, Task
Force Report on Budget and Accounting in the U.S. Government (Washington,
D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1965 ), p. 18.

62/ Creative Federalism, Part I, op. cit., pp. 394-398.

63/

For an additional listing of Bureau of the Budget activities in coordinating
Federal programs and facilitating intergovernmental cooperation, including
interagency committees, Executive Orders and conducting procedures, see
Creative Federalism, Part I, op. cit., pp. 421-434.

64/ U.S. Congress, House, Government Electronic Data Processing Systems, Hearings before the Subcommittee on Census and Statistics, Committee on Post Office and Civil Service, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966), pp. 6 ff.

65/ Committee for Economic Development, Budgeting for National Objectives (New York, 1966), pp. 12-13.

66/

See U.S. Congress, House Committee on Government Operations, Federal-State-
Local Relations, House Report No. 1055, 85th Cong., 2d Sess., 1958, pp. 65-
74; Robert A. Aleshire, "The Federal Metropolitan Representative: A Pro-
posal for Improved Coordination" (unpublished Master's thesis, School of
Government and International Affairs, The George Washington University,
1966), pp. 79-80; Creative Federalism, Part I, op. cit., p. 398.

67/ Creative Federalism, Part I, op. cit., p. 398.

68/ The Federal System as Seen by Federal Aid Officials, op. cit.

69/ Ibid., p. 101.

70/ For information on these problems specifically within urban areas also see U.S. Congress, Senate, Committee on Government Operations, Subcommittee on Executive Reorganization, Federal Role in Urban Affairs, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966), 14 volumes. 71/ Creative Federalism, Part I, op. cit., p. 5.

72/ Ibid., p. 4.

73/ For listings of intra- and interdepartmental agreements and organizations, see ibid., HUD, pp. 138-39; OEO, pp. 232-33; HEW, pp. 287-89; Commerce, pp. 380-81; and Agriculture, pp. 457-67.

74/ Ibid., p. 265.

75/ Bureau of the Budget Office Memorandum 100, July 24, 1943.

76/ Aleshire, op. cit., p. 68.

CHAPTER 5 (Cont'd)

77/ Public Papers of the Presidents, John F. Kennedy, 1961, Memorandum on the Need for Greater Coordination of Regional and Field Activites of the Government, November 14, 1961, p. 717.

78/ William E. Howe, "Interagency Field Coordination of United States Government Activities" (unpublished Master's thesis, School of Government, Business and International Affairs, The George Washington University, 1965), p. 85.

79/ Aleshire, op. cit., pp. 78-79.

80/ P.L. 89-754.

81/ Robert A. Wood quoted in Robert A. Aleshire, "The Metropolitan Desk: A New Technique in Program Teamwork," Public Administration Review, XXVI, 91 (June, 1966).

82/ Advisory Committee on HEW Relationships with State Health Agencies Report to the Secretary (Washington, D.C., December 30, 1966), p. 101.

83/ Ibid., p. 102.

84/ P.L. 89-754, Sec. 103.

85/ Joseph E. Kallenbach, The American Chief Executive (New York and London: Harper and Row, 1966), pp. 407-08. See also Morton Grodzins, The American System (Chicago: Rand McNally and Co., 1966), p. 260.

86/ Creative Federalism, Part I, op. cit., p. 323.

87/ U.S. Congress, Senate Joint Committee on the Organization of the Congress of the United States, Organization of Congress, Final Report, Report No. 1414, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966).

88/ For additional criticisms of Congressional budgetary procedures, see CED, Budgeting for National Objectives, op. cit., p. 42.

89/ Organization of Congress, op. cit., p. 27.

90/ U.S. Congressional Record, Volume 113, No. 90, June 8, 1967, p. s7880.

91/ Organization of Congress, op. cit., p. 34.

92/ CED, Budgeting for National Objectives, op. cit., p. 49.

93/ Ibid., p. 56.

94/ The Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, A Survey Report on the Impact of Federal Grants-in-Aid on Structure and Functions of State and Local Governments (Washington, D.C., 1955), p. 18.

95/ The Council of State Governments, State Government Organization and Federal Grant-in-Aid Program Requirements, op. cit.

CHAPTER 5 (Cont'd)

96/ The Federal System as Seen by Federal Aid Officials, op. cit., pp. 90-94. 97/ The Federal System as Seen by State and Local Officials, op. cit., p. 36. 98/ Deil S. Wright and Richard L. McAnow, American State Administrators:

Study

Code and Marginal Tabulations for the State Administrative Officials Questionnaire (Iowa City, Iowa: Department of Political Science and Institute of Public Affairs, The University of Iowa, January, 1965), 40 pages, mimeographed.

99/ Colman B. Ransone, Jr., The Office of the Governor in the United States (University, Alabama: University of Alabama Press, 1956), p. 249.

100/ Ibid., p. 250.

101/ U.S. Congress House Committee on Government Operations, Sixth Report, Replies from State and Local Governments to Questionnaire on Intergovernmental Relations, 85th Cong., 1st Sess., p. 4.

102/ Council of State Governments, Federal Grants-in-Aid, Report of the Committee on Federal Grants-in-Aid (Chicago, 1949), pp. 273-281.

103/ Ibid., pp. 273-81.

104/ Federal State Local Relations, op. cit., pp. 47-49.

105/ The Federal System as Seen by State and Local Officials, op. cit., p. 1.

112/ Council of State Governments, Federal Grant-in-Aid Requirements Impeding State Administration (Chicago, 1966), pp. 7-20.

113/ Ibid., pp. 20-21.

114/ The Federal System as Seen by State and Local Officials, op. cit.

115/ International City Managers' Association, "Summary of responses to questionnaire circulated to city managers regarding local administrative problems most often encountered in their work with Federal departments and agencies" (Washington, D.C., 1966), mimeograph.