Annual Report of the Interstate Commerce Commission, Volume 42The Commission, 1928 - Interstate commerce With appendices. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 60
Page 12
... Northern Pacific Railway Co. , the Great Northern Railway Co. , and the Spokane , Portland & Seattle Rail- way Co. These applications were pending at the close of the period covered by our last report . Our views as to the advantages of ...
... Northern Pacific Railway Co. , the Great Northern Railway Co. , and the Spokane , Portland & Seattle Rail- way Co. These applications were pending at the close of the period covered by our last report . Our views as to the advantages of ...
Page 21
... Northern Railway Company v . United States and Interstate Commerce Commission , 277 U. S. 172 . In this case the court was asked to annul and set aside our action in certifying to the Secretary of the Treasury amounts due under section ...
... Northern Railway Company v . United States and Interstate Commerce Commission , 277 U. S. 172 . In this case the court was asked to annul and set aside our action in certifying to the Secretary of the Treasury amounts due under section ...
Page 24
... Northern Pacific Railway Company v . Interstate Commerce Com- mission , 275 U. S. 572 . In this case the Supreme Court denied a writ of certiorari under circumstances which may be described briefly as follows : The Northern Pacific ...
... Northern Pacific Railway Company v . Interstate Commerce Com- mission , 275 U. S. 572 . In this case the Supreme Court denied a writ of certiorari under circumstances which may be described briefly as follows : The Northern Pacific ...
Page 33
... Northern District of Texas rendered judg- ment in favor of the Government which was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit , 22 F. ( 2 ) 795 , that court holding that inasmuch as the Fort Worth Belt was a REPORT ...
... Northern District of Texas rendered judg- ment in favor of the Government which was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit , 22 F. ( 2 ) 795 , that court holding that inasmuch as the Fort Worth Belt was a REPORT ...
Page 69
... Northern Pacific Railway Co. and Minneapolis , St. Paul & Sault Ste . Marie Railway Co. , for authority to establish joint passenger - train service between Minneapolis , St. Paul , and Duluth , Minn . , and Superior Wis . , and to ...
... Northern Pacific Railway Co. and Minneapolis , St. Paul & Sault Ste . Marie Railway Co. , for authority to establish joint passenger - train service between Minneapolis , St. Paul , and Duluth , Minn . , and Superior Wis . , and to ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Asso bituminous coal Bureau Calif canceled and proceeding carriers cars cent Chicago classification common-carrier purposes Complaint dismissed County defendants destinations District Court Docket filed Final value found applicable found not justified found not unreasonable found unreasonable freight further hearing grain Illinois inapplicable interstate commerce act Interstate Commerce Commission intrastate joint rates June 30 Kansas City less than carloads lines locomotives Louis Louisiana Lumber miles Mississippi River Missouri mixed carloads nonprejudicial Northern O. R. R. Co Ohio Okla Oklahoma operating original report otherwise unlawful Pacific points proceeding discontinued Railroad Rate charged rate-making purposes Reasonable rates prescribed Reparation awarded Reparation denied Revenue S. F. Ry schedules ordered canceled shippers Southern steam railways Suspended schedules ordered switching Telephone Tenn Texas tion traffic train-stop transportation undue prejudice unduly prejudicial United unjustly discriminatory unreasonable and unduly unreasonable or otherwise unreasonable or unduly valuation value for rate-making Virginia Western
Popular passages
Page 72 - States, or from or to any place in the United States to or from a foreign country, but only in so far as such transportation or transmission takes place within the United States.
Page 20 - Commission shall give due consideration, among other things, to the efficiency with which the carriers concerned are operated, the amount of revenue required to pay their respective operating expenses, taxes, and a fair return on their railway property held for and used in the service of transportation...
Page 72 - If no joint rate over the through route has been established, the several carriers in such through route shall file, print and keep open to public inspection as aforesaid, the separately established rates, fares and charges applied to the through transi>ortatiou.
Page 84 - An Act to promote the safety of employees and travelers upon railroads by compelling common carriers engaged in interstate commerce to equip their cars with automatic couplers and continuous brakes, and their locomotives with driving-wheel brakes, and for other purposes...
Page 84 - USC 36, 37), to investigate, test experimentally, and report on the use and need of any appliances or systems intended to promote the safety of railway operation...
Page 80 - That as used in this section the term "carrier" means a common carrier by railroad (except a street, suburban, or interurban electric railway which is not operated as a part of a general steam railroad system of transportation...
Page 72 - The schedules printed as aforesaid by any such common carrier shall plainly state the places between which property and passengers will be carried, and shall contain the classification of freight in force, and shall also state separately all terminal charges, storage charges, icing charges, and all other charges which the Commission may require, all privileges or facilities granted or allowed and any rules or regulations...
Page 154 - State authorities in the enforcement of any provision of this act. "(4) whenever in any such Investigation the commission, after full hearing, finds that any such rate, fare, charge, classification, regulation, or practice causes any undue or unreasonable advantage, preference. or prejudice as between persons or localities In intrastate commerce on the one hand and Interstate or foreign commerce...
Page 4 - Commission, by one of such carriers of the control of any other such carrier or carriers either under a lease or by the purchase of stock or in any other manner not involving the consolidation of such carriers into a single system for ownership and operation...
Page 97 - November 19, 1927, a petition for writ of certiorari was filed in the Supreme Court, on December 12, 1927, motion for the writ was submitted, and on January 3, 1928, the motion was denied.