Page images

A performance bond would be required.
No liquor could be sold. Beer is sold in certain facilities.

The subcommittee would wish to know what wage schedule or wage policy the contractor would intend using.

The subcommittee would wish to know to what extent the contractor would continue to use existing personnel.

All restaurant personnel, after the effective date of the contract, would be personnel of the contractor and not personnel of the House of Representatives.

The contract would probably be made for 1 year, with provision for extension. The Government would reserve the right to terminate the contract by giving the contractor 60 days' notice in writing.

It is not possible to determine the effective date of the contract at this time.

There are certain standard general provisions, not detailed here, that would be made a part of the contiact.

Due to space limitations and other structural considerations, it is assumed operation of the restaurants will be continued under the present physical building layouts-for example, the kitchen for the restaurants in the Capitol is located on one floor and the dining facilities on another floor.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]


[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]


[ocr errors]

Operating financial details Food and beverage sales:


1964 Cost of sales:


Operating expenses (including salaries and wages, employee benefits,
laundry, china, etc.):

190.). ---------------------------------------------------

1964.-------------Profit on cigar-stand operations:


Vending machine commissions:


Equipment expenditures


1964.--Vet losses:

1967. 1966.. 1965.

1964... Estimated for 1968:

Total sales.--
Food sales.------

38, 478 34, 526 24, 683 27, 242


[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Net loss....
NOTE.-The years shown rofer to fiscal years.


350, 000

AUTOMATION PROGRAM First, the automation program. It is the conviction of the American Library Association that the efforts of libraries throughout this country to apply corputer technology to their operations will, to a large extent, be dependent upon the Library of Congress' success in this field. The pilot project to provide machine-readable cataloging data to libraries on an experimental basis has been met with a great deal of enthusiasm by the participating libraries. The second phase of this program-MARC II-holds even greater promise. The format prepared and developed by the Library's automation experts was accepted as a proposed national standard by two ALA divisions during its 1988 midwinter conference. The extension of the MAR II program, with the distribution of more and more cataloging information on magnetic tape, and the appropriation of funds requested by the Library for its overall automatiot program are imperative if libraries are to keep pace with the information explosion.

SPECIAL FOREIGN CURRENCY BOOK PROCUREMENT The Public Law 480 book procurement program, which utilizes United States-owned foreign currencies, can be described as a model for the cooperative acquisition of books and other materials from foreign lands. Since Cougress first approved funding for this program in 1961, over 8 million items important to researcch have been acquired for libraries in all 50 States of the Union. The ALA urges strongly that your subcommittee approve the requests for this program,


The Library's catalog card distribution program is essential to the library economy of this Nation. Funds requested for this operation are returned in full to the U.S. Treasury and the Association strongly commends the request before you in order that the speed and efficiency of the program will not be impaired by the ever-increasing workload resulting from orders by American libraries for catalog cards.

BOOKS FOR BLIND AND PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED Certainly no librarian in this country can forget library service to the blind and physically handicapped. The Congress has been generous in its support of the national books for the blind and physically handicapped program and the Association urges you to continue this support.


The American Library Association has gone on record as strongly supportinz the Library of Congress' need for a third building and the appropriation of funds to insure this end. At its Midwinter meeting in January, the Association adopted the following resolution:

Be it resolved, That the American Library Association, a professional organimtion with a membership of more than 37,000, hereby urges the Congress of the United States to take immediate action to make appropriations to further the construction of the Library of Congress James Madison Memorial Building in the interest of economy and efficiency, because, due to escalation in prices, ant delay only adds to the cost of the building, which is generally recognized ** essential. Funds now necessarily being expended for rental space could be saved and services vital to the library world, the research community and the publis would not be endangered because of lack of appropriate space; THEREFORE tb American Library Association calls upon the Congress to act swiftly in the national interest on behalf of the Library of Congress, which serves as the national library of the United States and whose services are central and essentia, to the welfare of the Nation's libraries and all the people they serve.

We cannot stress too strongly the necessity for this building if the Library Congress is to be truly a library for the Nation, if it is to serve libraries communities throughout the land. As the situation now stands, overcrowdiny and dispersement of activities are hampering the Library's services and efficience Escalation in construction costs coupled with the bill for rental space are start reminders that economy will not be served by delay in appropriating the mood


Finally, to continue the operation and development of the Nation's depository ibrary program, the Association recommends that the subcommittee provide he $1.879 million recommended in the 1969 Federal budget to enable the Superntendent of Documents to further the implementation of this essential program, Tuthorized by the Depository Library Act of 1962.

Federal funds allocated to this program of making Government-produced facts Lvailable to all who need them are an investment in an important share of the tovernment's output of information resources. One of the main objectives of lepository libraries is to assist the taxpayer in his search for current and reliable ata. The benefits derived from this activity accrue, in turn, to business, industry, cience, research, and ultimately to the United States as a whole. By developing nd increasing the number of designated depository libraries, Congress will be trengthening the country's information network.

In addition to GPO publications, other prime sources of objective information, hich contribute to the depository library knowledge bank, are the so-called on-GPO documents. These are publications printed by Federal departments and gencies outside the Government Printing Office. They are the results, in many ases, of Government research and study, and contain data of great value for be users of libraries. These documents should be distributed as part of the epository library system.

In view of the preceding facts concerning the great value of these programs nd services to the Nation, it is urged that the subcommittee approve the budget equests of the Library of Congress, allow the budget item for the continuance [ work on the James Madison Memorial Library of Congress building, and uthorize adequate funds for the implementation of the Depository Library Act : 1962.



(CLERK'S NOTE.—The following proposals for consideration in conection with the budget for 1969 were submitted after the close of the ormal hearings:)


Washington, D.C., May 16, 1968. on. GEORGE W. ANDREWS, hairman, Legislative Subcommittee, ouse Committee on Appropriations, 'ashington, D.C. MY DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: When I appeared before your committee on arch 28, 1968, I presented a justification of a budget estimate of $6,975,000, subitted through the Bureau of the Budget at the direction of the House Office cilding Commission, for remodeling the Longworth House Office Building and her work necessary in connection therewith, detailed on pages 256 and 257 of e House hearings. When I appeared before your committee on April 2, 1968, I presented to your mmittee items of work, estimated to cost $700,000, necessary to be done in the cal year 1969 in the three House Office Buildings and the Congressional Hotel the event the Longworth remodeling program is deferred, detailed on page 298 the House hearings.



One of the items included in the estimate of $700,000 was $113,500 for installan of a firearms practice range for the Capitol Police in the lowest garage level the Rayburn Building, which would cause the loss of only about eight parking ices. This item was not included in the remodeling estimate of $6,975,000. At

hearings, you will recall, we stated that this item had not been heard by the use Office Building Commission, but that we understood the Commission viewed sympathetically. it a meeting of the House Office Building Commission, yesterday, the Comssion unanimously endorsed the proposal for installing a firearms practice

range in the proposed location in the Rayburn Building, and requested the Ares tect of the Capitol to advise your committee that the Commission considers this an urgently needed item and to request your committee to give favorable consideration to the inclusion of the funds requested for this item in the legislative branch appropriation bill for 1969. The Chief of the Capitol Police also makes an urgent plea for this item, and I fully concur in the urgency of need. Prior to approving this item, the same was discussed with the select committee in charge of the House garages, appointed under authority of House Resolution 514, 90th Congress, and the three members of this committee (Congressman Sisk, Congressman Hays, and Congressman Gross) also endorsed use of the garage space in the Rayburn Building for a firearms practice range.


Since we appeared before your committee, need for another item has arisen, estimated to cost $25,000. At the meeting of the House Office Building Commission, yesterday, Congressman Price and other members of the House Commmittee on Standards of Official Conduct appeared before the Commission to request that their committee be assigned space on the third floor of the Rayburn Building, identified as room 2360; that the Commission endorse a request for a appropriation of $25,000 to make necessary changes in this one large room to accommodate their committee, in accordance with a layout prepared by the Architect of the Capitol at the request of the committee.

The Commission unanimously approved the requests of the committee and directed the Architect of the Capitol to request the House Appropriations Committee to give favorable consideration to the inclusion of $25,000 for this purpose in the legislative branch appropriation bill for 1969.

If funds for the remodeling program are not allowed for the fiscal year 1942 then it is requested that this item of $25,000 be added to the amount of $700.000 for the items of work recommended to be done in the fiscal year 1969, increas ing the total amount, requested, to $725,000.

In testifying before your committee, we advised that the only unfinished spaces in the Rayburn Building, suitable for committee use during the it modeling of the Longworth Building, were rooms 2358, 2360, and 2362 on the third floor of the Rayburn Building; that these rooms are now being used for the storage of furniture by the Clerk of the House; that, approval of eithe: funds for a complete remodeling program or, in lieu thereof, $700,000 for work recommended to be done in the fiscal year 1969, in any event, would provide other storage areas for the furniture and permit these rooms to be vacated for committee use.

Assignment by the House Office Building Commission of room 2360 to the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct would leave rooms 2358 and 2362 available for other committee use when the Longworth Building is te modeled, and would not interfere with the remodeling program.

Under the amount of $25,000, it is proposed to subdivide room 2360, which co tains approximately 1,600 square feet of space into seven rooms by erection & masonry and metal partitions. The plans provide for a conference room, a room for the staff director, a room for the assistant staff director and staff, a RC for a secretary, a room for a records clerk, a clerical and reception room, and a storage room for files.

Breakdown of estimate
Masonry and plastering work.--
Metal partition work-------
Electrical work (including relocating lighting fixtures, electrical and

telephone installations)-----
Acoustical work (including removal and replacement of existing ceiling).
Carpentry and millwork-------
Heating, ventilating, and air conditioning ----
Miscellaneous and contingency------

[ocr errors]

65 oldin



Yours very truly,

--------- 35.0



May 15, 1968.
Chairman, Subcommittee on Legislative Branch, Committee on Appropriations,

House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DEAR GEORGE: The House Office Building Commission today approved a request to assign and subdivide 1,566 square feet at 2360 Rayburn House Office Building for the occupancy and use of this committee. A detailed plan of the subdivision is attached. The Architect's estimated cost of the entire project is $25,000.

The requested space is only slightly larger than that presently assigned. It is, however, unlike the present space, adaptable to proper storage of the financial disclosure records, which will shortly be required, and to conversational security. The sensitivity of matters that might be expected to come before this committee makes these considerations most important.

In order that the work may go forward, it is respectfully requested that provision for this expenditure be made in the legislative branch appropriation bill now under consideration by your subcommittee. Under the most favorable timing, occupancy could not be expected before early next year.

If I may supply additional information or appear before your subcommittee on behalf of this request, I shall be happy to do so. With kindest personal regards. Sincerely,

MELVIN PRICE, Chairman. NOTE.- Detailed layout plan referred to omitted here.

[ocr errors]
« PreviousContinue »