Page images
PDF
EPUB

Court decisions--Continued.

Henkel v. United States, 237 U. S. 43, 59 L. Ed. 831, 35 Sup. Ct. 536,
affirming 196 Fed. 345, 116 C. C. A. 165.

Hewes v. All Persons et al., Charles Malan v. Imperial Irrigation
District_.

Page

53

34, 46, 379
11, 127

Hillcrest Irr. Dist. v. Brose, 24 Ida. 376, 133 Pac. 663.
Horstmann Co. v. United States, 257 U. S. 138, 66 L. Ed. 171, 42 Sup.
Ct. 58; 54 Ct. Cl. 214 affirmed__

Ide v. United States, 263 U. S. 497, 68 L. Ed. 407, 44 Sup. Ct. 182,
affirming U. S. v. Ide, 277 Fed. 373_.

Imperial Water Co. v. Holabird, receiver California Development Co.,
197 Fed. 4, 116 C. C. A. 526.

Irwin v. Wright, 42 Sup. Ct. 293, 258 U. S. 219, 66 L. Ed. 573–

Jackson v. United States, 230 U. S. 1–22_

55

4, 60

59

49,

112, 137, 146, 211

189

312

22

61

46, 129

61

529

380

Johnson v. Warm Springs Irrigation District, 246 Pac. 527-.
Kansas Pac. Ry. Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 13 Fed. 106__
Kansas v. Colorado__.

Klamath County v. Colonial Realty Co., 7 Pac. (2d) 976–
Knudson v. Omanson, 10 Utah 124, 37 Pac. 250_

Lambye v. Garcia, 157 Pac. 977---

Lehi City v. Meiling, City Recorder, 48 Pac. (2d) 530-

Ley & Co. v. United States, 273 U. S. 386_.

Lincoln Land Co. v. Goshen Irr. Dist., 293 Pac. 373_

Loney v. Scott, 57 Or. 378, 112 Pac. 172_

266, 268

Malan, Chas., v. Imperial Irrigation District....

McLaren v. Fleischer, 185 Pac. 967; certiorari granted, 40 Sup. Ct. 482,
253 U. S. 479, 64 L. Ed. 1023_

[blocks in formation]

McLean v. Truckee-Carson Irrigation District, 245 Pac. 285-
Magruder v. Belle Fourche Valley Water Users' Association, 219 Fed.
72, 133 C. C. A. 524_____

Malone v. El Paso Co. Water Improvement District No. 1, 20 S. W.
(2d) 815_.

Marsters et al. v. United States, 236 Fed. 663_.
Michaelson v. Miller (1933), 26 Pac. (2d) 378.

Minidoka Irrigation District v. Wilbur, 1931, 50 Fed. (2) 495, cer-
tiorari denied, 284 U. S. 634_.

Minidoka Railway Co. v. United States, 235 U. S. 211, 59 L. Ed. 200,
35 Sup. Ct. 46, reversing 190 Fed. 491 and affirming 176 Fed. 762_-
Minidoka Railway Co. v. Weymouth, 19 Ida. 234, 113 Pac. 455_.
Mosher v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Association, 209 Pac. 596_
Moody v. Johnston, 66 Fed. (2d) 999__

Moore v. Anderson, 68 Fed. (2d) 191, certiorari denied October 8,
1934, 293 U. S. 567__.

[blocks in formation]

Mullen Benevolent Corporation v. United States and Mullen Invest-
ment Co. v. United States, 63 Fed. (2d) 48, 56, certiorari granted
May 29, 1933, judgment affirmed November 6, 1933 (290 U. S. 89)__ 56-57
Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District, memorandum decision, June 26,
1918--

61

150, 152

Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District v. Bond, 26S U. S. 50, 45 Sup. Ct.
383, 69 L. Ed. 843; 283 Fed. 569, 288 Fed. 541 affirmed.
Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District v. Petrie, 153 Pac. 425; idem,
223 Pac. 531; 37 Ida. 45.

Natron Soda Co. v. United States, 257 U. S. 138, 66 L. Ed.

Sup. Ct. 58; 54 Ct. Cl. 169 and 55 Ct. Cl. 66 affirmed__-

[blocks in formation]

New York Canal Co. v. Bond, 273 Fed. 825--
New York Trust Co. v. Farmers Irrigation District, 280 Fed. 785--
Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. Mitchell, 208 Fed. 469_.

North Side Canal Co. v. State of Wyoming, 8 Fed. (2d) 739; 17 Fed.
(2d) 55; certiorari denied, 47 Sup. Ct. 586; 274 U. S. 740_.
North Side Canal Co. v. Twin Falls Canal Co., 12 Fed. (2d) 311.
Oregon Short Line R. R. Co. v. Minidoka Irrigation District, 283
Pac. 614.

Court decisions-Continued.

Page

Orme v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Association, 217 Pac. 935__
Pacific Coast Construction Co. v. United States, 53 Ct. Cl. 582_
Page and Brinton v. United States, 56 Ct. Cl. 176_-
Payette-Boise Water Users' Association v. Bond, 269 Fed. 159_.
Payette-Boise Water Users' Association v. Cole, 263 Fed. 734_--- 37, 40, 152
Payne v. Central Pac. R. Co., 255 U. S., 228_.
Payne v. State of New Mexico, 255 U. S. 367-

52

42

35, 42

41

27

27

Peters v. National Surety Co., 166 N. W. 43, 167 Wis. 131; rehearing
denied 166 N. W. 1087, 167 Wis. 131_

35

Pioneer Irrigation District v. American Ditch Association, 1 Pac.
(2d) 196, 52 Ida., 732__

58

Pioneer Irrigation District v. Stone, 23 Ida. 344; 130 Pac. 382___ 11, 126–127
Ramshorn Ditch Co. v. United States, 269 Fed. 80, affirming U. S. v.
Ramshorn Ditch Co., 254 Fed. 842.

60, 127

Robinson & Son v. United States, 53 Ct. Cl. 536.

42

Salt River Valley Water Users' Association v. Spicer, 236 Pac. 728--
Saylor v. Gray, 20 Pac. (2d) 441_.

52

38

Shoshone Irrigation District v. Harold L. Ickes, 70 Fed. (2d) 771,
certiorari denied October 8, 1934 (293 U. S. 571).
Shoshone Irr. Dist. v. Lincoln Land Co., Memo dec..

[blocks in formation]

Spurrier v. Mitchell Irrigation District, 229 N. W. 273, appeal to Sup.
Ct. denied Apr. 20, 1930-.

189

Sperry v. Elephant Butte Irrigation District, 270 Pac. 889-
Stanfield v. Umatilla R. Water Users' Association, 192 Fed. 596-
Steacy-Schmidt Mfg. Co. v. United States, 64 Ct. Cls. 499-

154

12

34-35

52

44

Sunnyside Irrigation District, Moore v. Anderson, 68 Fed. (2d) 191,
certiorari denied October 8, 1934, 293 U. S. 567–

Smith v. Dickerson, 297 Pac. 402_

Suspension of construction charges, Chinook Div..

Swigart v. Baker, 229 U. S. 187, 57 L. Ed. 1143, 33 Sup. Ct. 645, re-
versing 199 Fed. 865, 118 C. C. A. 313, and affirming Baker v.
Swigart, 196 Fed. 569__

450

12, 43, 51

Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Amer. Falls Res. Dist. No. 2, 45 Fed. (2d)
649
Twin Falls Canal Co. v. American Falls Reservoir District No. 2
(D. C., Idaho, 1931), 49 Fed. (2d) 632. Affirmed (C. C. A., 9th Cir.
1932) 59 Fed. (2d) 19. October 17, 1932, petition for writ of cer-
tiorari to C. C. A. for 9th Cir. denied, 287 U. S. 638_
Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Foote, 192 Fed. 583.

Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Teton Co.---

425

52

12, 18

50

Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Wyoming, manuscript decision___
Umatilla Water Users' Association v. Irvin, 108 Pac. 1016__.
United States v. Arizona, 295 U. S. 174_

United States v. Bennett, 207 Fed. 524, 125 C. C. A. 186.

50

43

529

60

United States v. Bridgeport Irrigation District, 40 Fed. (2d) 827;
petition for certiorari to Sup. Ct. denied, 282 U. S. XV..

United States v. Brown, 279 Fed. 168; affirmed to Brown v. U. S., 263
U. S. 78, 68 L. Ed. 171, 44 Sup. Ct. 92-

United States v. Buchanan, 232 U. S. 76, 58 L. Ed. 514, 34 Sup. Ct. 237
United States v. Buffalo Pitts Co., 34 Sup. Ct. 840, 234 U. S. 228, 58
L. Ed. 1290; 193 Fed. 905 affirmed....

[blocks in formation]

United States v. Burley, 172 Fed. 615; affirmed Burley v. U. S., 179
Fed. 1, 102 C. C. A. 429, 33 L. R. A. (N. S.) 807_--

11, 35-36, 54, 72

United States v. Cantrall, 176 Fed. 949_

United States v. Canyon Co., 232 Fed. 985_.

43, 51
49, 137

United States v. Conrad Investment Co. (C. C. Mont.) 156 Fed. 124;
affirmed 161 Fed. 829; 88 C. C. A. 647.
United States v. Donohoe, 33 Fed. (2d) 362_
United States v. Fall, 276 Fed. 622_.

8

150-151

22, 31, 116, 158

United States v. Franks_.

United States v. Gratiot, 14 Pet. 526, 10 L. Ed. 573, 13 U. S. 644_.
United States v. Griffith, 2 Fed. (2d) 925--

55

13

205

Court decisions-Continued.

United States v. Hanson, 167 Fed. 881, 93 C. C. A. 371.

Page

11, 21, 24, 88

United States v. Ide, 277 Fed. 373; affirmed in Ide v. U. S. 263.

U. S. 497, 68 L. Ed. 407, 44 Sup. Ct. 182_.
United States v. Mason & Hangar Co., 260 U. S. 323.

4, 60
380

United States v. Minidoka R. Co. (Ida.), 176 Fed. 762; reversed in
190 Fed. 491; affirmed in 235 U. S. 211, 59 L. Ed. 200, 35 Sup. Ct. 46
United States v. O'Neill, 198 Fed. 677---
United States v. Parkins, 18 Fed. (2d) 643_.

5, 28

United States v. Ramshorn Ditch Co., 254 Fed. 842; affirmed in Rams-
horn Ditch Co. v. U. S., 269 Fed. 80_-

60, 127

[ocr errors]

United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co., 174 U. S. 690;
184 U. S. 416; 215 U. S. 266_.

72

United States v. Rogers, 41 Sup. Ct. 281, 255 U. S. 163, 65 L. Ed.
566, affirming 257 Fed. 397__.

55

United States v. Schechter Poultry Co., 295 U. S. 495.

United States v. Schodde, Custer & Nelson, 1394, U. S. C. A., 9th Cir-
cuit__

525

57-58

United States v. Union Gap Irrigation Co., 209 Fed. 274
United States v. Union Gap Irrigation Co., 39 Fed. (2d) 46_
United States v. Van Horn, 197 Fed. 611__.

60

59

3, 4, 5, 6

United States v. Wade (unpublished manuscript dec.)
United States v. Weisberger, 206 Fed. 641_-.

55

34

United States v. West Side Irrigation Co., 230 Fed. 284; affirmed West
Side Irrigation Co. v. U. S., 246 Fed. 212, 158 C. C. A. 372_
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States, 53 Ct. Cls.
561

59

34

Verde River Irrigation & Power District v. Work, 24 Fed. (2d), 886;
certiorari denied, 279 U. S. 854_.

127

Verde Water & Power Co. v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Asso-
ciation, 197 Pac. 227; certiorari denied, 257 U. S. 643_.
Washoe County Water Conservation District v. Beemer, 45 Fed. (2)_ 779–

25

785, 529

West Side Irrigation Co. v. United States, 246 Fed. 212, 158 C. C. A.
372, affirming U. S. v. West Side Irrigation Co., 230 Fed. 284_
Whiffiin v. Cole, memorandum decision (Boise), 264 Fed. 252.
Wilbur v. Burley Irrigation District, 58 Fed. (2d) 871---
Wilbur v. Minidoka Irrigation District, 50 Fed. (2d) 495, certiorari
denied, 284 U. S. 634_.

59

12

495

130, 298

49, 137

237

Wood v. Canyon County, 253 Pac. 839.
Work v. Mason, 6 Fed. (2d) 474___
Wyoming v. Colorado, 42 Sup. Ct. 552, 259 U. S. 419, 463, 66 L. Ed.
999

Wyoming (State Board of Equalization of) v. North Side Canal Co.,
8 Fed. (2d) 739; 17 Fed. (2d) 55; certiorari denied, 274 U. S.
740

Wyoming v. United States, 255, U. S. 489, Supr. Ct. Decision, 6/1/36_
Yuma County Water Users' Association v. Schlecht, 275 Fed. 885;
affirmed, 43 Sup. Ct. 498, 262 U. S. 138, 67 L. Ed. 909–

Crafts, Albert M. (36 L. D. 138), mineral lands.
Credit for refund, construction charges.

61

49-50

27

19, 40, 155

28

343

Credits on construction charges, Yuma and Yuma Mesa_.
Credits on operation and maintenance charges, Yuma and Yuma Mesa-
Credits on charges paid on land to be conveyed to United States, Klamath
project

355

405

524

Crehore, Lawrence W. (51 L. D. 345), refunds to veterans.

304

Crop return, gross annual, Secretary without authority to change the per-
centum of (Dept. dec.).

[blocks in formation]

Culpepper v. Ocheltree, 185 Pac. 971, certiorari granted, 253 U. S. 480-

[blocks in formation]

D

Dam across Rio Grande__.

Damage claims against Government-.

Damages collected not to be credited to reclamation fund.

[blocks in formation]

Damages or delays in construction work, Government's liability for----

Damages, payment of, to Hatch flood claimants---

Damages, liquidated, do not cover equipment....

Page
72,96
272

14

62, 186

55

54

189

62, 186

34

[blocks in formation]

Date of payment of construction charges, fact finders' act.

295

Dates, payment of charges (extension act and act May 15, 1922)---- 150, 152, 266
Davis, Howe & Co., payment of amount deducted as liquidated damages,
Salt Lake Basin project_.

470

Deadwood Reservoir, application of power revenues from Black Canyon
dam----

415

Deceased employees, personal effects of (Comp. Gen. dec.) -

14

Default in payment, forfeiture__

148

Defaulting contractors, funds collected from---

430

Deferred payments may again be deferred (Dept. dec.).

547

Deferment of construction charges under section 9 of moratorium act of
April 1, 1932 (Dept. dec.) ––-

Deficiency acts. See appropriation act (deficiency).

484 485

Deferred construction charges, Department construction of section 4 of
moratorium act of April 1, 1932___

482-483

Delay in delivery, administrative officers have no authority to waive__
Delay in delivery of goods, computation of time..

42

42

Delinquent amounts, collection of, under relief act--

Delinquent applicants, water for (Pub. Res.).

Delays of damages, Government's liability for..

Delinquency in payment of charges for more than 12 months-----

Delinquent charges, penalties on--

De Long, Frederick C. (36 L. D. 332), descent of rights..

34

462

262

258

130, 266

30

Demonstrations on reclamation projects---

469

Denver office, headquarters of chief engineer__.

308, 462

Delivery time to be increased proportional to increase in order....
Denver office appropriation_.

37

161

Departmental decisions:

Attendance at meetings to be specifically authorized by Secretary__
Authority, delegation of, to approve land sales.......

569

314

Award of bids to high bidder___

27

Boulder Canyon, all-American canal, San Diego contract_

387

Boulder Canyon, mining claims---

Collections of construction charges, calendar year 1931, under mora-

[blocks in formation]

Crop return, gross annual, Secretary without authority to change
per centum of..

[blocks in formation]

Delay in delivery of goods, administrative officers may not waive_
Delivery time to be increased proportional to increase in order_
Delegation of authority to approve land sales----
Exchange of patented lands-----

42

37

314

300

Departmental decisions--Continued.

Federal Subsistence Homestead Corporation, right of under Reclama-
tion projects---

Page

Freight rates, authority to contract for lower.

Glasgow irrigation district, increase of indebtedness..

Irrigation districts, reasonable time permitted to dispose of lands

Kimmel, Glen L., and Goshen irrigation district (excess acreage).

139

[blocks in formation]

Patents for entries bid in by associations at tax sales..

Power plant profits, North Platte project_--

[ocr errors]

27

70

130

309

[blocks in formation]

Payette Boise Water Users' Association, stock subscriptions in---- 43–44
Relief covers penalty for nonpayment charges, moratorium acts___.
Rights of way, purchase of---

[blocks in formation]

State of Washington contract on settlement of Kittitas division, ex-
penditures under_----

[blocks in formation]

Desert-land entries in Riverside County, Calif. (act).

421

Desert-land entries not permitted..

27

Desert-land entries, size of farm units on (act of June 6, 1930).

429

Desert-land entrymen, rights of...

30

Designation of officials and name of bureau, change of_.

140

Disability or death benefits of employees under E. R. A. A. of 1935
(Comp. Gen. dec.)____

572

Disposal of land classified as temporarily or permanently unproductive__
Ditch right of way-.

[blocks in formation]

Domestic materials clause, Treasury and Post Office appropriation act_-

[blocks in formation]

Drainage works, part of project (Yuma County Water Users' Association
V. Schlecht).

150, 152

19

« PreviousContinue »