Page images
PDF
EPUB

IN THE

Supreme Court of the United States

OCTOBER TERM, 1977

No. 77-922

CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Petitioner

V.

HAROLD BROWN, et al., Respondents

On Writ of Certiorari to the
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES

JOSEPH A. KEYES, JR.
Suite 200

One Dupont Circle, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036

Attorney for Amicus Curiae

PRESS OF BYRON S. ADAMS PRINTING, INC., WASHINGTON, D. C.

[blocks in formation]

I. An Investigator's Ideas and Creative Work Are
Valuable

II. An Investigator's Ideas, Properly Handled,
May be Transformed Into Commercially Valu-
able Property

III. Exemption 4 of the FOIA is of Crucial Significance in the Protection of an Investigator's Ideas

IV. Harm to the Public Interest Results from Current Unpredictability of Protection from Disclosure

5

7

8

17

...

V. The FOIA Must be Interpreted Consistent with Relevant Constitutional and Statutory Provisions and with the Public Interest

CONCLUSION

APPENDIX A

20

21

la

APPENDIX B

32-635 - 78 12

4a

ii CASES:

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Ex Parte Hershberger, 96 U.S.P.Q. 54 (Bd. App. 1952)
Gulliksen v. Halberg, 75 U.S.P.Q. 252 (Bd. App. 1937)
Hamilton Laboratories v. Massengill, 111 F. 2d 584,
45 U.S.P.Q. 594 (6th Cir. 1940)

Indiana General Corp. v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp., 249
F. Supp. 809, 148 U.S.P.Q. 312 (S.D. Cal. 1966) ..
Keewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp., 416 U.S. 470 (1970)
National Parks and Conservation Association v. Mor-
ton, 498 F. 2d 765 (D.C. Cir. 1974)

Page

[blocks in formation]

.13, 14, 15

Petkas v. Staats, 501 F. 2d 887 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
Sears v. Gottschalk, 357 F. Supp. 1327 (E.D. Va. 1973),
aff'd. 502 F. 2d 122 (4th Cir. 1974)

Washington Research Project, Inc. v. Weinberger, 504
F.2d 238 (D.C. Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S.
963 (1975)

CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS:

14

13

. 10, 12, 15

United States Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 8

United States Constitution, Amendment V

220

[blocks in formation]

3

86 Stat. 770 (Federal Advisory Committee Act)

OTHER AUTHORITIES:

Basic Data Relating to the National Institutes of Health, DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 77-1261, 1977

2,6 Government Accounting Office, "Problem Areas Affecting Usefulness of Results of GovernmentSponsored Research in Medicinal Chemistry," GAO Report No. B-164031 (2) (1968) ...

18

Table of Authorities Continued

iii

Page

Hearings on the Business Record Exemption of the Freedom of Information Act before a Subcommittee of the House Committee on Government Operations, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. (1977), page 321 .... 10 Letter to Heads of all Federal Departments and Agencies re: "Freedom of Information Act," dated May 5, 1977, from Griffin B. Bell, Attorney General National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, "Disclosure of Research Information Under the Freedom of Information Act," DHEW Publication No. (OS) 77-003 (1977)

16

21

Report of the President's Biomedical Research Panel,
"Disclosure of Research Information," DHEW
Publication No. (OS) 76-513 (June 30, 1976) ..7, 19, 21
Wade, "Peer Review System: How to Hand out Money

Fairly," 179 Science (No. 4069) 158, 159 (1973) .. Watson, "The Sharing of Unpublished Information," second Frank Nelson Doubleday Lecture for 197374, at the National Museum of History and Technology, January 29, 1974 ..

121 Cong. Rec. H 12379 (1975)

5

.9, 10

12

IN THE

Supreme Court of the United States

OCTOBER TERM, 1977

No. 77-922

CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Petitioner

V.

HAROLD BROWN, et al., Respondents

On Writ of Certiorari to the
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE

ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES

OPINIONS BELOW

The opinion of the court of appeals is reprinted as Appendix A to the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. The opinion of the district court is reported at 412 F. Supp. 171.

JURISDICTION

The jurisdiction of this Court rests on 28 U.S.C. § 1254 (1).

CONSENT TO FILE

This Amicus Curiae brief is being filed with the consent of all the parties to the proceeding.

Letters of consent of all parties to the case have been filed with the Clerk of the Court.

« PreviousContinue »