Reorganization Plan No. 5 of 1966: National Capital Regional Planning Council: Hearing Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, Eighty-ninth Congress, Second Session. August 9, 1966 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 13
Page 8
... questions that need to be asked . I am impressed very much with the importance of both of these plans . Chairman ... question which bothered me , and I wrote the Budget Bureau a letter on this some months ago - this plan was sent up ...
... questions that need to be asked . I am impressed very much with the importance of both of these plans . Chairman ... question which bothered me , and I wrote the Budget Bureau a letter on this some months ago - this plan was sent up ...
Page 8
... question , planning requirements , overlapping , competing planning requirements , where they may be serious problems for local jurisdictions . Mr. REUSS . For example , in the last 6 REORGANIZATION PLAN NO . 5 OF 1966 9.
... question , planning requirements , overlapping , competing planning requirements , where they may be serious problems for local jurisdictions . Mr. REUSS . For example , in the last 6 REORGANIZATION PLAN NO . 5 OF 1966 9.
Page 10
... question . In your arithmetic as to the savings , you point out that the Regional Planning Council has been spending around $ 100,000 a year , and you anticipate savings of around $ 25,000 a year . Your savings sound almost too modest ...
... question . In your arithmetic as to the savings , you point out that the Regional Planning Council has been spending around $ 100,000 a year , and you anticipate savings of around $ 25,000 a year . Your savings sound almost too modest ...
Page 15
... questions . Chairman DAWSON . Mr. Erlenborn ? Mr. ERLENBORN . I have one or two questions about your organiza- tion . I suppose it isn't really terribly pertinent to the question of the adoption of the Reorganization Plan No. 5 , but ...
... questions . Chairman DAWSON . Mr. Erlenborn ? Mr. ERLENBORN . I have one or two questions about your organiza- tion . I suppose it isn't really terribly pertinent to the question of the adoption of the Reorganization Plan No. 5 , but ...
Page 17
... question , again maybe somewhat off our subject matter here , but I would just be interested in knowing , How many municipalities in this area have primary sewage treatment . facilities and how many have tertiary treatment facilities ...
... question , again maybe somewhat off our subject matter here , but I would just be interested in knowing , How many municipalities in this area have primary sewage treatment . facilities and how many have tertiary treatment facilities ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abolished activities advisory air pollution amended areawide Arlington County ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Babson board of directors Bosley budget Bureau Capital Planning Act Capital Planning Commission Capital Region Transportation Capital Regional Planning carried Chairman DAWSON COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT comprehensive planning comprehensive regional planning Congress cooperative coordinated Council of Governments deputy executive director District of Columbia elected officials eligible environmental health ERLENBORN Fairfax County Federal agency Federal funds Federal Government Federal installations Federal interest gentlemen HENDERSON HOLIFIELD Housing and Urban jurisdictions LASTNER liaison function LOHMAN Maryland ments Metropolitan Council metropolitan planning Metropolitan Washington Council National Capital area National Capital Planning National Capital Regional NCPC politan prepared statement President question Region Transportation Planning regional planning agencies Regional Planning Council regional planning function reorganization plan representatives REUSS ROSENTHAL SCHEIBER SEIDMAN sewer staff suburbs tion Transportation Planning Board TUCHTAN Urban Development Act Washington area water pollution water supply