Page images
PDF
EPUB

Motor Truck Transfer, Inc., Contract Carrier Application, 23
M. C. C. 709

Myers Common Carrier Application, 23 M. C. C. 451.............
National Poultry, Butter & Egg Assn. v. Aberdeen & R. R. Co.,

192 I. C. C. 13..

Page

409

94

271, 289 696

New Colonial Ice Co., Inc., v. Helvering, 292 U. S. 435..
New England Motor Carrier Rates, 8 M. C. C. 287; 8 M. C. C.
549; 9 M. C. C. 737; 10 M. C. C. 157; 10 M. C. C. 522; 10
M. C. C. 581; 11 M. C. C. 325; 12 M. C. C. 417; 16 M. C. C.
499; 18 M. C. C. 79; 19 M. C. C. 471; 19 M. C. C. 777; 21 M.
C. C. 373; 22 M. C. C. 705; 23 M. C. C. 361; 23 M. C. C. 389;
24 M. C. C. 213; 24 M. C. C. 423; 24 M. C. C. 723; 26 M.
C. C. 195; 26 M. C. C. 623; 26 M. C. C. 689; 26 M. C. C.
783; 27 M. C. C. 1; 28 M. C. C. 31; 28 M. C. C. 355..

31,

107

196, 197, 229, 355, 537, 552 New Jersey-New York Bus Applications, 23 M. C. C. 219. New York & New Brunswick Auto Exp. Co., Inc., Com. Car. App., 23 M. C. C. 663. ..

343, 699

New York Central Securities Corp. v. United States, 287 U. S.
12...

New York, N. Y., Commercial Zone, 1 M. C. C. 665...
Nudelman Common Carrier Application, 22 M. C. C. 275; 28
M. C. C. 91..

O. & W. Transit Co. Common Carrier Application, 4 M. C. C.
575..

Oilfields Trucking Co.-Purchase-Dunbar, 5 M. C. C. 137...
Onondaga Freight Corp. Common Carrier Application, 21
M. C. C. 810; 24 M. C. C. 161..

Pan-American Bus Lines Operation, 1 M. C. C. 191. -
Paper Boxes from Lawrence, Kans., to Iowa Points, 24 M. C. C.
63...

9

732

91, 467

499

697

53

14

292

Parcel Delivery Service, Inc.-Common Carrier Application, 13 M. C. C. 15.

94

Contract Carrier Application, 8 M. C. C. 275_

94

Peanut Butter from Montgomery, Ala., to Georgia, 22 M. C. C. 375 ...

197

Peninsula Transit Corp. Common Carrier Application, 1
M. C. C. 440....
Pennsylvania Truck Lines, Inc.-Control-Barker M. Frt.,
1 M. C. C. 101; 5 M. C. C. 9; 5 M. C. C. 49.......
Petroleum and Its Products, 171 I. C. C. 286.
Petroleum, McPherson and Eldorado, Kans., to Nebraska, 24
M. C. C. 95____.

357, 798

788

530

474

Petroleum Transport Co. Common Carrier Application, 24
M. C. C. 389___
Pittsburgh-Weirton Bus Co., Inc., Com. Car. Application, 10
M. C. C. 266___.

Potato Rates in Western Trunk Line Territory, 195 I. C. C.
579-----
Practices of Motor Common Carriers of Household Goods, 17
M. C. C. 467_-_

Page

209

93

288

758

632

50, 83, 85, 90, 105, 263, 340, 384, 388, 436, 522, 525, 622, 725, Pregler Extension of Operations, 23 M. C. C. 691.. Railway Exp. Agency, Inc., Determination of Status, 21 M. C. C. 161...

Rainville Contract Carrier Application, 20 M. C. C. 307.
R. &. R. Exp. Co. Contract Carrier Application, 7 M. C. C.
115____.

22

404

210

168, 730

Rates on Lumber and Lumber Products, 52 I. C. C. 598.
Rayfield Contract Carrier Application, 21 M. C. C. 214...
Roofing from the East to the South, 10 M. C. C. 589.
Rush Common Carrier Application, 17 M. C. C. 661...
St. Andrews Bay Transp. Co. Extension of Operations, 3 M. C.
C. 711..

202

748

301

788

St. Louis, Mo.-East St. Louis, Ill., Commercial Zone, 1 M. C.
C. 656_--

758

Schappi Bus Line, Inc., Ext.-Hammond, Ind.-Harvey, Ill., 18 M. C. C. 715...

751

Schiller Common Carrier Application, 24 M. C. C. 127...---Schulman & Co., Inc., Contract Carrier Application, 6 M. C. C. 680.

Schwerling Common Carrier Application, 23 M. C. C. 459---Seaboard A. L. Ry. Co. M. Operation-Gaston-Garnett, S. C., 17 M. C. C. 413.

94

5, 22

Slagle Contract Carrier Application, 2 M. C. C. 127. 433, 446, 524 Slocum Extension of Operations-Portland, Oreg., 23 M. C. C.

398

398

808...

460

Smith v. Coleman, 127 S. W. (2d) 928

447

Soldier Extension of Operations, 13 M. C. C. 804----.
Southwest Freight Lines, Inc., Contr. Car. Application, 26
M. C. C. 775...

486

341

Southwest Missouri R. Co. Common Carrier Application, 4
M. C. C. 582.......

398

Stephenson v. Binford, 287 U. S. 251_---

631

Stoves-Alabama and Tennessee-Interstate Points, 4 M. C. C.

641..

197

Sullivan County Highway Line, Inc., Com. Car. Applic., 21
M. C. C. 717.......

System Arizona Exp. Service, Inc., Com. Car. Application,
4 M. C. C. 129.

System Freight Service Common Carrier Application. See
System Arizona Exp. Service, Inc., Common Carrier Appli-
cation.

Texas v. United States, 292 U. S. 522---
Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc.-Purchase-Gorman, 5
M. C. C. 712...

Transamerican Frt. Lines, Inc. (Delaware)-Consolidation,
5 M. C. C. 225___

Tri-State Transp. Co. Common Carrier Application, 7 M. C. C. 707.

Trunk Line Territory Motor Carrier Rates, 24 M. C. C. 501; 28 M. C. C. 45; 28 M. C. C. 369; 28 M. C. C. 463.....

Page

98

407

9

494

494

691

45,

148, 369, 463, 529, 773

United Cartage Co. Common Carrier Application, 27 M. C. C. 215____

United States v. American Trucking Assns., Inc., 310 U. S. 534....

469

128, 140

Chicago Heights Trucking Co., 310 U. S. 344.
Florida East Coast Ry. Co., 222 Fed. 33..

[blocks in formation]

Universal Service, Inc.-Purchase-W. R. Arthur & Co., Inc.,

15 M. C. C. 247..

697

Vogel Extension of Operations, 11 M. C. C. 803.

261

W. A. Barrows Porcelain Enamel Co. v. Cushman M. Delivery, 11 M. C. C. 365...

351

Warner Common Carrier Application, 9 M. C. C. 614..
Western Truck Lines Contract Carrier Application, 14
M. C. C. 369___

78

398

Western Trunk Line Class Rates, 164 I. C. C. 1...

271

Whisky, Cincinnati and Ky. Points to Southern States, 22
M. C. C. 81.....

606

Whitworth Contract Carrier Application, 10 M. C. C. 810; 22 M. C. C. 597-

441

Ziffrin's Overnite Exp., Inc.-Purchase-Overnite Exp., Inc., 5 M. C. C. 246..

380

Ziffrin Truck Lines, Inc.-Common Carrier Application, 6
M. C. C. 722_.

684

Merger, 25 M. C. C. 788...

380

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
REPORTS MOTOR CARRIER CASES

No. MC-20163

C. RANDELL BEAR CONTRACT CARRIER APPLICATION

Submitted October 29, 1937. Decided December 18, 1940

Applicant found to have failed to establish the right to a certificate as a common carrier or a permit as a contract carrier by motor vehicle under the "grandfather" provisions of sections 206 (a) and 209 (a) of the Interstate Commerce Act. Application denied.

Herman A. Fischer for applicant.

B. W. LaTourette, C. R. Morrow, Ferdinand Born, Harry F. Chaddick, Carson L. Taylor, K. W. Cunningham, and H. W. Schaffer for protestants.

REPORT OF THE COMMISSION

DIVISION 5, COMMISSIONERS LEE, ROGERS, AND PATTERSON BY DIVISION 5:

Exceptions were filed by applicant and by protestant rail carriers to the report and recommended order of the examiner.

By application filed February 12, 1936, as amended, C. Randell Bear, of Evanston, Ill., seeks a permit or a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing continuance of operation as a common or contract carrier by motor vehicle of general commodities, in truckloads, between Chicago, Ill., and Denver, Colo., as follows: From Chicago over U. S. Highway 30 to its junction with U. S. Highway 138; thence over U. S. Highway 138 to Sterling, Colo.; thence over U. S. Highway 6 to Greeley, Colo; and thence over U. S. Highway 85 to Denver; with an alternate route between Chicago and Omaha over U. S. Highway 34 to its junction with Illinois Highway 92, thence over Illinois Highway 92 to Davenport, Iowa, thence over U. S. Highway 6 to Omaha; and return over the same routes, serving

Under the "grandfather" clauses of sections 206 (a) and 209 (a) of the Interstate Commerce Act.

unspecified intermediate and off-route points. Various motor carriers and rail lines in western trunk-line territory opposed the application.

Applicant has been engaged since about June or July 1933 in the transportation of general freight, in truckloads, for the Hoey Company. He testified that this transportation has been performed from and to warehouses at Chicago, Omaha, and Denver, and that once or twice a year he would take a load of wallpaper to St. Joseph, Mo., or Lincoln, Nebr. Abstracts of freight shipments transported by applicant disclose that his principal operation has consisted of the movement of truckload shipments of property between the terminal of the Hoey Company at Chicago and warehouses at Omaha and Denver, with occasional movements of freight from Denver to points in Nebraska. His equipment as of July 1, 1935, consisted of two tractors and two trucks, and he has since acquired three more tractor-trailer units. In 1934 he was registered under a code of fair competition for the trucking industry as operating in Illinois, Iowa, and Nebraska.

Bills of lading covering shipments transported by applicant are issued by the Hoey Company and do not come into applicant's possession. However, delivery receipts captioned "Hoey Cartage Co., Inc.," were submitted covering shipments transported by applicant, including movements from Chicago to Omaha and Denver in April, May, and June, 1935. These were issued in triplicate by the Hoey Company as consignor, and do not purport to describe the commodities transported. Each delivery receipt shows the name and address of a warehouse or storage company at one of the points mentioned above, sometimes the total number of pieces in the load, the total weight thereof, and either the rate and charges or merely a flat rate. Certain of the receipts also show deductions from the transportation charges, including amounts for loading, cargo insurance, and 4 percent for the Hoey Company. Most of the receipts describe the lading as "One lot Mdse" and show the time of arrival of the truck at its destination. Many are stamped "deduct five cents per cwt. if this load is late unless truckman wires showing breakdown or weather delay."

The operations of applicant, particularly in Iowa and Colorado, have been conducted under the State operating authority of the Hoey Company. Insurance coverage is obtained by the Hoey Company, and the name of the latter is displayed on applicant's vehicles. The goods transported by applicant for the Hoey Company are obtained by the latter from the Central States Freight Service, Inc., a freight forwarder, of Chicago, Ill., and are loaded on applicant's vehicles

« PreviousContinue »