ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Community Water Supply Study was made possible by the joint participation of all personnel in the Bureau of Water Hygiene. The cooperation of the state and local health departments involved and the utilities studied is gratefully acknowledged. Finally, special thanks is given to the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for their review and comments on this study and report. This Committee included: Earnest F. Gloyna The University of Texas Henry J. Ongerth - State of California Gerald T. Orlob - Water Resources Engineers, Inc. John E. Trygg State of Louisiana John E. Vogt State of Michigan 42-778 O 70 pt. 4 23 ECA 18 (CIN) Consumer Protection and Environmental Health Service Environmental Control Administration From Fig 1-D.W.S. (1) Min. number samples recommended per month by PHS DAS (2) Avg. number/month for last 12 months From plant Range of least and most monthly 4) Number of months the Drinking Water Standards vere UNKNOWN UND CARD ONE not met during the last 12 months for: Na of months UNKNOWN a) Quality-Sec 3.2. D. W. S. sample (b) Number of samples numbers no. in 6.A.C distribution minthe yes (5) Are samples representative of tribute? Judge from map of (6) Are check samples collected as provided for in the system. Drinking Water Standards? Sec 3.15- D.W.S. (7) Are samples requiring check samples reported_phone? (8) Is the laboratory certified? ation from operat one or both, by whom was it certified. samples received by lab within 30 hours? ECA-19 (9) |