we are therefore asking for a separate vote on that paragraph for the reasons that I explained before having to do with the use of the word "condemns".

With regard to paragraph 8, we would abstain in the vote on that paragraph, if a separate vote is accorded, for two reasons. First, we believe that the language of the paragraph is far too sweeping and that it, in effect, calls for an embargo on the Government of Portugal, a cessation of all assistance to the Government of Portugal. Secondly, we believe that the paragraph is misplaced in this draft resolution, because it does not have a proper bearing on the subject of the resolution, which is non-compliance of Portugal with certain requests of the Assembly. In connexion with this same paragraph, paragraph 8, while we feel that this matter is irrelevant to the item under discussion, I do want to repeat again--so that there may be no misunderstanding-that we are unequivocally opposed to the diversion to Africa of equipment supplied to the Government of Portugal for purposes of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization-a diversion and use which would be inconsistent with our military defence assistance agreement with Portugal. Some time ago we sought, and we obtained, an assurance from the Government of Portugal that such equipment was not being employed in Angola, and would not be employed there in the future.

With regard to our request for separate votes, I should like to say that we see no reason why we should be denied-as we were in the Fourth Committee 23-the opportunity to express our opinion on these paragraphs by our votes, and why other like-minded delegations should be denied that opportunity. None of these paragraphs is in danger of defeat. We are under no illusions on that score. Therefore, we can see no reason why delegations should not be given an opportunity to express their views on these paragraphs by their votes. We believe that in a situation of this kind the majority should accord the minority that much consideration and that much courtesy.

A final word-in the event that a request should be made and approved for a separate vote on paragraph 5, my delegation would vote in favour of that paragraph, noting, as we have in the past, that with regard to this situation, with regard to the Portuguese territories, we believe that the hearing of petitioners is justified because of the continuing non-co-operation of the Government of Portugal with the United Nations in this regard. It is our position that this is a unique situation with regard to Non-Self-Governing Territories and has no bearing with respect to those territories where the Administering Authority has been fully co-operating with the United Nations.

55. NONCOMPLIANCE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF PORTUGAL WITH CHAPTER XI OF THE CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS AND WITH GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 1542 (XV): Resolution 1699 (XVI), Adopted by the U.N. General Assembly, December 19, 1961 24

The General Assembly,

Recalling that by resolution 1542 (XV) of 15 December 1960 25 it declared that an obligation exists on the part of the Government of Portugal to transmit information under Chapter XI of the Charter of the United Nations concerning Non-Self-Governing Territories under its administration, and that this obligation should be discharged without further delay,

Noting with deep regret that the Government of Portugal has refused and still continues to refuse to submit information on its NonSelf-Governing Territories or to participate in the work of the Committee on Information from Non-Self-Governing Territories, as called for by General Assembly resolution 1542 (XV) and Chapter XI of the Charter,

Recalling further the principles set forth in its resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960 entitled "Declaration on the granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples",26

Considering that the provisions of the said Declaration and any decision of the General Assembly concerning its implementation are fully applicable to the Territories under Portuguese administration equally with other Non-Self-Governing Territories,

Noting the continuing deterioration of the situation in the Territories under Portuguese administration,

1. Condemns the continuing non-compliance of the Government of Portugal with its obligations under Chapter XI of the Charter of the United Nations and with the terms of General Assembly resolution 1542 (XV), and its refusal to co-operate in the work of the Committee on Information from Non-Self-Governing Territories;

2. Considers it necessary that, pending the fulfilment of these obligations by the Government of Portugal, the General Assembly must, for its part, continue to discharge its own obligations and responsibilities towards the inhabitants of the Non-Self-Governing Territories under Portuguese administration;

3. Decides to establish a Special Committee of seven members to be elected by the General Assembly 27 to examine as a matter of urgency, within the context of Chapter XI of the Charter and relevant resolu

"U.N. General Assembly Official Records, Sixteenth Session, Supplement No. 17 (A/5100), p. 38. This resolution, sponsored by the representatives of 36 member states, was adopted by a vote of 90 (including the U.S.) to 3, with 2 abstentions.

"The text in American Foreign Policy: Current Documents, 1960, pp. 119–120. * Text ibid., pp. 110-111.

"Committee IV, acting on behalf of the General Assembly, elected Bulgaria, Ceylon, Colombia, Cyprus, Guatemala, Guinea, and Nigeria, Dec. 20, 1961; the General Assembly approved the election the same day.

Doc. 55

tions of the Assembly, such information as is available concerning Territories under Portuguese administration, and to formulate its observations, conclusions and recommendations for the consideration of the Assembly and any other body which the Assembly may appoint to assist it in the implementation of its resolution 1514 (XV);

4. Requests the Secretary-General, pending the compliance by Portugal with its obligations under Chapter XI of the Charter to transmit information on conditions in the Territories under its administration, to prepare for the use of the Special Committee, on the basis of available information, background papers containing information on conditions prevailing in the Territories under the administration of Portugal;

5. Authorizes the Special Committee, in order that information available to it may be as up to date and authentic as possible, to receive petitions and hear petitioners concerning conditions prevailing in Portuguese Non-Self-Governing Territories;

6. Requests the Secretary-General to furnish the Special Committee with such necessary secretarial and other assistance as it may require in the performance of its tasks;

7. Requests Member States to use their influence to secure the compliance of Portugal with its obligations under the Charter and the relevant resolutions of the General Assembly;

8. Further requests Member States to deny Portugal any support and assistance which it may use for the suppression of the peoples of its Non-Self-Governing Territories.

PREPARATION AND TRAINING OF INDIGENOUS CIVIL AND TECHNICAL CADRES IN NON-SELF-GOVERNING TERRITORIES: Resolution 1697 (XVI), Adopted by the U.N. General Assembly, December 19, 1961 28

RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN NON-SELF-GOVERNING TERRITORIES: Resolution 1698 (XVI), Adopted by the U.N. General Assembly, December 19, 1961 29

CONTINUATION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INFORMATION FROM NON-SELF-GOVERNING TERRITORIES: Resolution 1700 (XVI), Adopted by the U.N. General Assembly, December 19, 1961 30

28

"U.N. General Assembly Official Records, Sixteenth Session, Supplement No. 17 (A/5100), p. 37. This resolution, sponsored by the representatives of 17 member states, was adopted unanimously.

29

Ibid., pp. 37-38. This resolution, sponsored by the representatives of 24 member states, was adopted unanimously.

30

Ibid., pp. 38-39. This resolution, sponsored by the Representatives of Argentina, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Iran, the Philippines, Syria, and Venezuela, was adopted by a vote of 77 (including the U.S.) to 0, with 16 abstentions.

I. Refugees

[NOTE: See also post, pp. 532-533, and post, docs. 288–291.]

56. UNITED STATES REVIEW OF UNITED NATIONS REFUGEE PROGRAMS: Statement Made by the U.S. Representative (Wharton) in Committee III of the U.N. General Assembly, November 22, 1961 1

1

Before commenting on the High Commissioner's Annual Report,2 I wish to congratulate Mr. Felix Schnyder of Switzerland on his election to the important post of High Commissioner for Refugees. The energetic, resourceful, and tactful manner in which he has been carrying out his complex humanitarian tasks since assuming office in February of this year is indeed gratifying. We are exceedingly pleased that the responsibilities of the High Commissioner are in such capable hands.

The traditional interest of my Government in meeting the needs of refugees is well known. The High Commissioner's report of progress achieved on many fronts is therefore a source of real satisfaction. The basic task of international protection of refugees has been carried out effectively with the close cooperation of those governments in whose countries refugees reside. Accomplishments brought about by the successful implementation of material assistance programs are an even greater source of satisfaction.

3

The improved situation reported concerning refugees in Europe, is of special significance. With strong financial support, largely provided by World Refugee Year, the completion of the Camp Clearance Program is assured, including the firm settlement of refugees, once they have left camps. This is a major accomplishment. Closely related to this is the excellent progress which has been made in assisting non-settled refugees living outside of camps. Due to favorable economic conditions, many of these refugees are solving their problems without international help. Others, even though handicapped, are finding resettlement opportunities in new lands. Countries of asylum have generously lived up to their basic responsibilities for the care of refugees within their borders. Not only have they cooperated with the High Commissioner and contributed to his program, but they have carried out extensive programs of their own. Largely because of these efforts the residual problem has almost reached the point where it can be handled without further international assistance. The United States therefore supports the plan of the High Commissioner to establish a time limit for the completion of programs on behalf of nonsettled refugees who are living outside of camps.

1U.S.-U.N. press release 3861, Nov. 27, 1961. 2U.N. doc. A/4771/Rev.1 and Rev.1/Add.1.

'See U.N. General Assembly Res. 1285 (XIII) of Dec. 5, 1958; text in American Foreign Policy: Current Documents, 1958, p. 167.

Without going into detail, I should like to express satisfaction with the effective manner in which other elements of the High Commissioner's Program have been carried out. The High Commissioner's role in the provisions of emergency assistance to Algerian refugees in Tunisia and Morocco, and to Angolans in the Congo,5 has proved particularly helpful. The use of his "good offices" function elsewhere, and the related small scale contributions from the Emergency Fundé have also been helpful and have had the support of my Government. No statement dealing with refugees would be complete without paying special tribute to the outstanding efforts of the many private organizations who contribute so generously to refugee programs throughout the world. These private organizations provide both material assistance and the technical skills which are so essential to the successful establishment of refugees. Without their help the accomplishments reported by the High Commissioner would not have been possible.

In closing let me say again that we are pleased with the progress which the High Commissioner has reported. With Mr. Schnyder's leadership, and with the traditional support from governments and private organizations, continued progress is assured.

57. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHERING THE EFFORTS OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES: Resolution 1673 (XVI), Adopted by the U.N. General Assembly, December 18, 19617

The General Assembly,

8

Having considered the report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and having heard his statement before the Third Committee,

Taking note of the progress achieved in respect of the international protection of refugees and in seeking permanent solutions to refugee problems through voluntary repatriation, integration in countries of asylum or resettlement in other countries,

Expressing its appreciation for the efforts made by the High Commissioner to complete in the near future the major aid programmes for "old" refugees in Europe,

4 See U.N. General Assembly Res. 1672 (XVI) of Dec. 18, 1961; text in U.N. General Assembly Official Records, Sixteenth Session, Supplement No. 17 (A/5100), p. 28.

5 See U.N. General Assembly Res. 1671 (XVI) of Dec. 18, 1961; text ibid., pp. 27-28.

6 See U.N. General Assembly Res. 1166 (XII) of Nov. 26, 1957; text in American Foreign Policy: Current Documents, 1957, pp. 152–154.

7 U.N. General Assembly Official Records, Sixteenth Session, Supplement No. 17 (A/5100), p. 28. This resolution, sponsored by the Representatives of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, was adopted by a vote of 69 (including the U.S.) to 0, with 14 abstentions.

U.N. doc. A/4771/Rev. 1 and Rev. 1/Add. 1.

'U.N. doc. A/C.3/SR. 1112.