Clean Air Act Implementation: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundred Second Congress, First Session ...U.S. Government Printing Office, 1991 - Administrative procedure |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acid rain Administrator affect agency Air Act Amendments application Assets authority Boyden Gray Chairman Clean Air Act CNG TRANSMISSION CORPORATION Commission committee COMPANY 001 Competitiveness Council conflict of interest CONGRE CONGRESS THE LIBRARY CORP Council on Competitiveness Counsel decision DINGELL discussed docket emissions Energy environmental EPA's Ethics Executive Order Federal Power Act FERC filed final rule financial interest GAS TRANSMISSION Government Hubbard hydropower implementation incinerator income Indiana industry involved issues KOSTMAYER legislative LIBRARY OF CONGRESS license LUDWISZEWSKI MACRAE meeting NATURAL GAS NATURAL GAS COMPANY newspapers newsprint November 15 Office OIRA Permits participation particular matter pollution President's procedures proposed question record recuse recycling regulations regulatory review REILLY reporting period request ROSENBERG rulemaking Schedule Secretary SIKORSKI specific staff standards statute statutory deadline STUDDS Subcommittee TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE tion Vice President Quayle waiver WAXMAN White House
Popular passages
Page 365 - ... particular matter in which, to his knowledge, he, his spouse, minor child, partner, organization in which he is serving as officer, director, trustee, partner or employee, or any person or organization with whom he is negotiating or has any arrangement concerning prospective employment, has a financial interest — "Shall be fined not more than $10,000, or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
Page 452 - ... interest and receives in advance a written determination made by such official that the interest is not so substantial as to be deemed likely to affect the integrity of the services which the Government may expect from such officer or employee, or...
Page 195 - The Honorable Norman F. Lent, Ranking Minority Member Committee on Energy and Commerce The Honorable Philip R. Sharp, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and Power The Honorable Carlos J.
Page 527 - When rules are required by statute to be made on the record after opportunity for an agency hearing, sections 556 and 557 of this title apply instead of this subsection.
Page 346 - The Honorable Henry A. Waxman Chairman Subcommittee on Health and the Environment House Committee on Energy and Commerce...
Page 365 - ... receives in advance a written determination made by such official that the interest is not so substantial as to be deemed likely to affect the integrity of the services which the Government may expect from such officer or employee, or (2) if , by general rule or regulation published in the Federal Register, the financial interest has been exempted from the requirements of clause (1) hereof as being too remote or too inconsequential to affect the integrity of Government officers' or employees
Page 294 - Of course there may be duties so peculiarly and specifically committed to the discretion of a particular officer as to raise a question whether the President may overrule or revise the officer's interpretation of his statutory duty in a particular instance.
Page 217 - Secretary under such subsection in an expeditious manner in accordance with such reasonable time limits as may be set by the Secretary for the completion of action by the Commission on any such proposal. (c) Any function described in section 402 of this Act which relates to the establishment of rates and charges under the Federal Power Act or the Natural Gas Act. may be conducted by rulemaking procedures.
Page 207 - House of Representatives Washington DC 20515 Dear Mr. Chairman: I am writing in response to your letter of March 25, 1987.
Page 448 - The statute is thus directed not only at dishonor, but also at conduct that tempts dishonor. This broad proscription embodies a recognition of the fact that an impairment of impartial judgment can occur in even the most well-meaning men when their personal economic interests are affected by the business they transact on behalf of the Government.