Nuclear Reactor Safety, Hearings Before ..., 93:1-93:2 on .... 1973-74, Part 2 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 45
... accidents that are possible in other areas . Furthermore , the consequences of such an accident , if one should occur , with the type of requirements that we have at the present time for siting and operating procedures and so on , the ...
... accidents that are possible in other areas . Furthermore , the consequences of such an accident , if one should occur , with the type of requirements that we have at the present time for siting and operating procedures and so on , the ...
Page 49
... accidents . We feel that the chances of a serious accident happening at a nuclear plant are very small . Just what are the risks in operation of a nuclear plant ? To answer this question , we initiated about a year and one half ago a ...
... accidents . We feel that the chances of a serious accident happening at a nuclear plant are very small . Just what are the risks in operation of a nuclear plant ? To answer this question , we initiated about a year and one half ago a ...
Page 50
... accidents for workmen . Nuclear plants have a far better safety record than the fossil fuel plants . Based on the study of occupational safety experience of central station power plants , the accident severity rate for coal plants is ...
... accidents for workmen . Nuclear plants have a far better safety record than the fossil fuel plants . Based on the study of occupational safety experience of central station power plants , the accident severity rate for coal plants is ...
Page 69
... accident with the possibility of a very large release of radioactivity . This element of the controversy concerns whether an accident can happen , that is , what the probability of such an accident is , and whether the emergency systems ...
... accident with the possibility of a very large release of radioactivity . This element of the controversy concerns whether an accident can happen , that is , what the probability of such an accident is , and whether the emergency systems ...
Page 72
... accident , that its probability , as I have said , is so low as to be effectively negligible . However , in 1965 the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards recommended means to ameliorate the consequences of a pressure vessel rupture ...
... accident , that its probability , as I have said , is so low as to be effectively negligible . However , in 1965 the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards recommended means to ameliorate the consequences of a pressure vessel rupture ...
Common terms and phrases
accident AEC's analysis Appendix applicable Atomic Energy Commission believe blowdown boiling water reactor calculated Chairman PRICE cladding temperature codes Commission's Committee on Atomic conservatism conservative construction coolant core cooling systems correlation document effect Electric emergency core cooling engineering environmental evaluation models facility failure fission fission products flow fuel rods heat transfer heat transfer coefficients inspection issues Joint Committee KENDALL LAPP licensing LOCA loss-of-coolant accident NADER nuclear fission nuclear industry nuclear materials nuclear plants nuclear power plants nuclear reactor nuclear safety operating oxidation percent plutonium powerplants pressure vessel Pressurized Water Reactors problems protection quality assurance question radiation radioactive reactor safety record reflood regulations Regulatory Staff release Representative HANSEN Representative HOLIFIELD Representative HOSMER Representative MCCORMACK requirements result risk rupture safeguards safety research Scientists standards steam technical testimony tests tion utilities vendors water reactors Westinghouse zircaloy
Popular passages
Page 486 - Theoretical Possibilities and Consequences of Major Accidents in Large Nuclear Power Plants, USAEC Document WASH-740, March 1957 (p.
Page 925 - Executive order ; (2) related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency...
Page 58 - SECTION 1. DECLARATION. — Atomic energy is capable of application for peaceful as well as military purposes. It is therefore declared to be the policy of the United States that — a. the development, use, and control of atomic energy shall be directed so as to make the maximum contribution to the general welfare, subject at all times to the paramount objective of making the maximum contribution to the common defense and security: and b.
Page 925 - ... (4) trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential; (5) inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency; (6) personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy...
Page 1194 - An applicant for a license to construct and operate a production or utilization facility, or for an amendment to such license, is not required to provide for design features or other measures for the specific purpose of protection against the effects of (a) attacks and destructive acts, including sabotage, directed against the facility by an enemy of the United States, whether a foreign government or other person, or (b) use or deployment of weapons incident to US defense activities.
Page 925 - Investigatory files compiled for law enforcement purposes except to the extent available by law to a party other than an agency...
Page 52 - II consisted of testimony by the Atomic Energy Commissioners, their principal staff, the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards and the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel. Testimony was heard in public session on September 25, 26, and 27 and October 1 of last year.
Page 819 - to encourage, support and give priority consideration to activities leading to greater standardization of nuclear power plants in terms of their design, fabrication, construction, testing and operation.
Page 159 - ... immediately following onset of the postulated fission product release would not receive a total radiation dose to the whole body in excess of 25 rem or a total radiation dose in excess of 300 rem to the thyroid from iodine exposure.
Page 739 - quality assurance" comprises all those planned and systematic actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that a structure, system, or component will perform satisfactorily In service.