The Federal Antitrust Laws with Amendments: List of Cases Instituted by the United States and Citations of Cases Decided Thereunder Or Relating Thereto |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 19
Page 95
... agreed prices in the sale of lumber . Pleas of guilty were entered September 25 , 1907 , and fines aggregating $ 2,000 were imposed and collected . United States v . National Association of Retail Druggists et al . Petition filed May 9 ...
... agreed prices in the sale of lumber . Pleas of guilty were entered September 25 , 1907 , and fines aggregating $ 2,000 were imposed and collected . United States v . National Association of Retail Druggists et al . Petition filed May 9 ...
Page 106
... agreed decree was entered October 17 , 1911 , perpetually enjoining the association , its officers and members , from doing any and all of the acts com- plained of . ( See case No. 70 , page 123. ) United States v . Great Lakes Towing ...
... agreed decree was entered October 17 , 1911 , perpetually enjoining the association , its officers and members , from doing any and all of the acts com- plained of . ( See case No. 70 , page 123. ) United States v . Great Lakes Towing ...
Page 109
... agreed upon between counsel , and was entered by the court on October 12 , 1911 . United States v . Hamburg - Amerikanische Packetfahrt Actien Gesellschaft and others . Petition filed January 4 , 1911 , in the Circuit Court , Southern ...
... agreed upon between counsel , and was entered by the court on October 12 , 1911 . United States v . Hamburg - Amerikanische Packetfahrt Actien Gesellschaft and others . Petition filed January 4 , 1911 , in the Circuit Court , Southern ...
Page 128
... agreed decree was entered at Rochester on May 27 , 1913 . United States v . White et al . Indictment returned June 7 , 1913 , in the District Court , Southern District of West Virginia , against 19 members of the United Mine Work- ers ...
... agreed decree was entered at Rochester on May 27 , 1913 . United States v . White et al . Indictment returned June 7 , 1913 , in the District Court , Southern District of West Virginia , against 19 members of the United Mine Work- ers ...
Page 129
... monop- oly of the telephone business on the Pacific coast . After the introduction of part of the testimony in chief on behalf of the Government , the defendants agreed to meet 8 . 9 . the demands of the Government , 129.
... monop- oly of the telephone business on the Pacific coast . After the introduction of part of the testimony in chief on behalf of the Government , the defendants agreed to meet 8 . 9 . the demands of the Government , 129.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
alleging a combination Association Cement charging a combination charging defendants charging the defendants Circuit Court coal combination and conspiracy combining and conspiring commission Company consent decree conspiracy in restraint conspiracy to restrain conspiring to restrain Court of Appeals dealers December 18 decision decree was entered defendants entered pleas defendants with combining Demurrer dismissed District Court District of Illinois Eastern District engaged enjoining February 11 Federal Trade fendants final decree fines aggregating Government Indictment returned June individual defendants injunction interstate commerce jobbers June 29 Lumber manufacturers March 29 monopolize interstate trade motion Nolle prosequi entered nolo contendere Northern November November 23 October October 17 pleas of guilty remaining defendants restrain and monopolize restrain interstate trade restraint of interstate restraint of trade returned July Secretary September September 25 Sherman Antitrust Act Southern District stockyard supra Supreme Court thereof trade and commerce trict United unlawful violation York
Popular passages
Page 31 - It shall be the duty of the various district attorneys, under the direction of the Attorney General of the United States, to prosecute for the recovery of forfeitures.
Page 5 - That any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found or has an agent, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee.
Page 20 - That this right shall not apply to contempts committed in the presence of the court or so near thereto as to interfere directly with the administration of justice...
Page 26 - Complaints, orders and other processes of the commission or board under this section may be served by anyone duly authorized by the commission or board, either (a) by delivering a copy thereof to the person to be served, or to a member of the partnership to be served, or to the president, secretary or other executive officer or a director...
Page 46 - The costs and expenses of such prosecution shall be paid out of the appropriation for the expenses of the courts of the United States.
Page 33 - ... may be pending, that the ends of justice require that other parties should be brought before the court, the court may cause them to be summoned, whether they reside in the district in which the court is held or not; and subpoenas to that end may be served in any district by the marshal thereof.
Page 24 - ... if it shall appear to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be to the interest of the public...
Page 6 - ... where the effect of such acquisition may be to substantially lessen competition between the corporation whose stock is so acquired arid the corporation making the acquisition, or to restrain such commerce in any section or community, or tend to create a monopoly of any line of commerce.
Page 4 - ... unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly, to discriminate in price between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality...
Page 65 - An Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies...