INTERPRETATION See AUTHORI-
TIES, INTERPRETATION; CERTIFI-
CATES; RESTRICTIONS
INTERSTATE COMMERCE ACT
Legislative history
$203(a)(15): 240
$206(a)(7): 66
§5(1): 471
§12(1): 814
§12(4): 814
§17(3): 813, 817
§203(a)(1): 243
$203(a)(15): 240
§203(b)(8): 685
§206(a)(1): 66
$206(a)(7): 63, 66, 221
§207(a): 819
§208(c): 19
$209(b): 365
$210: 545
§210(a): 566
§211(b): 229
§212(a): 45, 564, 567, 589
§216(c): 190
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COM-
MISSION
Entire Commission proceedings 10,
307, 323, 522, 739, 766, 790
Field offices, regional limitations of 820
Jurisdiction
Conglomerates, examine structure of,
to see who is receiving contract carrier
service 242
None, regulate shippers 819
Retained, applicant's dual opera-
tions 85, 547
Retained, to assure service required is
provided 102
Smoking regulations 524
Temporary lease of rights pending per-
manent transfer 68
Pleadings, fully analyzes all 742
Policy
All applicants for authority must sub-
mit evidence as to operational fea-
sibility of proposal 195
Encourage all reasonable com-
petition 471
Encourage containerization 387
Demonstration trailers transported by
household goods carrier 284
Grocery stores, commodities not dealt in
by 788
Household goods weight estimates, in-
stituted 316
Notice of matters of law to be asserted at
hearing 435
Notice of violations to be asserted at
hearing, found sufficient 565
Points "within 175 miles of Chatta-
nooga," unauthorized operations be-
yond 435
Prior case asserted at hearing, respondent
charged with knowledge of own partici-
pation in 435
Schreiber, unauthorized operations and
control of another carrier 552
IRREGULAR ROUTES See ROUTES
State members waive participation 210,
699
JOINT-LINE SERVICE
Absent proof of inadequacy, com-
petitive single-line service not
authorized 470
Deterioration or loss of, considered 470
Existing service
Found adequate 470, 581
Found inadequate 98
Inadequacy of, must be shown with
specificity 581, 598
Fuel waste in, justifies single-line
grant 378
No duty to provide, but shipper's ex-
tensive use of, and need for single-line,
should be noted 379
Protestants' dependence on, to provide
peddle-run service in sparsely popu-
lated rural area, application de-
nied 581
Single-line service substituted for appli-
cant's prior public advantages outweigh
harm to existing carriers 99, 378
NOTICE See also FEDERAL REGISTER
Application published in three distinct
parts, two later withdrawn, adequate to
advise prospective parties of
differences among authorities and
restrictions sought in each part 289
Applications, under $5 of APA 798
Certificates of support, testimony ad-
mitted despite technical violations of
Schaeffer Rules, where protestants had
adequate notice 94
Commission places itself in position of
opposing carrier to determine whether
notice is ambiguous 289
Gateway relocation application, succinct
but found to be adequate 762
Investigation hearing, matters to be as-
serted at, found sufficient 565
Law, matters of, asserted in investigation
hearing, need not include notice of
every case to be relied upon but only
legal issues involved 435
Prior case asserted at investigation
hearing, respondent charged with
knowledge of own participation 435
Protests, of, filing requirements
tightened 820, 825
Suspension of certificates 567
OPERATING ECONOMIES
Alternate gateways, granted to eliminate
inefficiency only when no harm to
existing carriers, since operational in-
efficiency is of carrier's own
chosing 872
Applicant's 20-foot straight trucks trans-
ports commodity more efficiently and
economically than protestant's 40-
foot 541
Energy factors, cannot be given con-
trolling weight due to inability to
quantify 879
Existing carrier's, decrease of, increase in
applicant's would be offset by 879
Gateway relocation granted in light of
fuel conservation and operating cost
savings 760
Operational feasibility, all applicants
must submit evidence concerning 195
Public convenience and necessity found
in, contributing to expedition and
efficiency 378, 762
Single-line substituted for fuel-wasteful
joint-line service 378
Minorities as 336
Skimming eliminated 336
PAGE LIMITS See PRACTICE AND
PROCEDURE, RECONSIDERATION
Charter or special operations
Broker agent not party to contract 22
Deadhead mileage regulations (49 CFR
1054.5(a)) 21
Intrastate carrier, leasing arrangements
directly with charter parties, question-
able 721, 725
Movement of group of nonidentical
passengers deemed "return" movement
of another group, regulations a-
mended 23
Protestants offer the economical, non-
luxury service required, application de-
nied 725
Travel agents, not licensed as brokers,
must comply with Tauck Tours require-
ments in arranging charter
parties 725
Competition, benefits of introduction of
additional 726
Rates for less luxurious mode of travel,
considered 725
Smoking regulations, modified 534, 537
Testimony not as specific and certain as
freight shippers 724
Travel agents, testimony reflects needs of
traveling public 725
|