Page images
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

Uniform administrative requirements for grants
and cooperative agreements to State and local
governments ............

New restrictions on lobbying
Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap in pro-
grams and activities receiving Federal financial
assistance

...... .....

Enforcement of nondiscrimination on the basis of
handicap in programs or activities conducted by
the National Science Foundation .....
Procedures and criteria for resolving questions in-
volving moral character or loyalty of applicants
for and holders of National Science Foundation
Fellowships ......
Nondiscrimination in federally-assisted programs
of the National Science Foundation-effec-
tuation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Availability of records and information

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Privacy Act regulations

[merged small][ocr errors]

Government in the Sunshine Act regulations of the
National Science Board

131

[ocr errors]

Nondiscrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from NSF ......

133

Governmentwide debarment and suspension
(nonprocurement) and governmentwide require-
ments for drug-free workplace (grants)
Fellowship Review Panel ...................

Compliance with the National Environmental Pol-
icy Act

138

156

157

Part

641

650

660

670

671

672

680

681

682

Environmental assessment procedures for proposed
National Science Foundation actions in Antarc-
tica......

Patents

[blocks in formation]

175

Edification ! Security prog Classification

178

189

Li Derivative cl Dovarading

Mandatory d

Access to cla

197

Airess by Irmer Preside

[ocr errors]

Intergovernmental review of the National Science
Foundation programs and activities
Conservation of Antarctic animals and plants
Waste regulation

Enforcement and Hearing Procedures; Tourism
Guidelines

NSF conflict-of-interests rules and standards of
conduct: Introduction and general provisions ...... 209
Conflicts or potential conflicts in handling propos-
als and awards .......

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][subsumed][merged small][merged small][subsumed][merged small][merged small][subsumed][merged small][subsumed][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

683

Other conflicts rules

684

"special employees"

689

Misconduct in science and engineering

690

Protection of human subjects

Subject Index to 45 CFR parts 680-684

[ocr errors]

240follow

262

[merged small][ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

(b) Encouraging Foundation personnel to challenge those classification decisions they believe to be improper.

(c) Issuing directives that ensure classified information is used, processed, stored, reproduced and transmitted only under conditions that will provide adequate protection and prevent access by unauthorized persons.

(d) Recommending to the Director appropriate administrative action to correct abuse or violation of any provision of these regulations, including notification by warning letters, formal reprimand, and to the extent permitted by law, suspension without pay and removal.

$601.4 Classification Review Committee.

The Security Officer (Information) chairs the Foundation's Classification Review Committee which has authority to act on all suggestions and complaints with respect to the Foundation's administration of the regulations. The Assistant Directors and the Heads of other offices reporting to the Director serve as members of the Committee. All suggestions and complaints including those regarding overclassification, failure to classify, or delay in declassifying not otherwise resolved, shall be referred to the Committee for resolution. The Committee shall establish procedures to review and act within 30 days upon all appeals regarding requests for declassification. The Committee is authorized to overrule previous determinations in whole or in part when in its judgment, continued protection is no longer required. If the Committee determines that continued classification is required under the criteria of the Executive Order, it shall promptly so notify the requester and advise him that he may file an application for review with the Foundation. In addition, the Committee shall review all appeals of requests for records under section 552 of title 5 U.S.C. (Freedom of Information Act) when the proposed denial is based on their continued classification under Executive Order 12356.

§ 601.5 Derivative classification.

Distinct from "original" classification is the determination that informa

tion is in substance the same as information currently classified, because of incorporating, paraphrasing, restating or generating in new form information that is already classified, and marking the newly developed material consistent with the marking of the source information. Persons who only reproduce, extract, or summarize classified information, or who only apply classification markings derived from source material or as directed by a classification guide, need not possess original classification authority.

cessor; a supervisory official of either;
or officials delegated such authority in
writing by the Director.

(c) The Director shall conduct inter-
nal systematic review programs for
classified information originated by
the Foundation contained in records
determined by the Archivist to be per-
manently valuable but that have not
been accessioned into the National Ar-
chives of the United States.

(a) If a person who applies derivative classification markings believes that the paraphrasing, restating, or summarizing of classified information has changed the level of or removed the basis for classification, that person must consult for a determination an appropriate official of the originating agency or office of origin who has the authority to upgrade, downgrade, or declassify the information.

[blocks in formation]

brief sta

denial, a

the detern

Review

[ocr errors]

(d) The Archivist of the United States shall, in accordance with procedures and timeframes prescribed in the Information Security Oversight Of such a fice's directives implementing E.0.Founda 12356, systematically review for declas-be consi sification or downgrading, classified the re records accessioned into the National Archives of the United States. Such in formation shall be reviewed by the Archivist for declassification or down-be for grading in accordance with systematic review guidelines that shall be provided by the head of the agency that originated the information, or in the case of foreign government informato ch tion, by the Director of Information Security Oversight Office in consulta tion with interested agency heads.

(b) The person who applies derivative classification markings shall observe and respect original classification decisions; and carry forward to any newly created documents any assigned authorized markings. The declassification date or event that provides the longest period of classification shall be used for documents classified on the basis of multiple sources.

8601.6 Downgrading and declassifica-
tion.

Executive Order 12356 prescribes a
uniform system for classifying, declas-
sifying, and safeguarding national se-
curity information.

[ocr errors]

Par notifi

$601.7 Mandatory declassification re-
view.

ployee

classi

th

A that

(a) The Division of Administrative Services is hereby designated as the of fice to which members of the public or Departments may direct requests for mandatory review for declassification under this provision. In the case of documents originally classified by the Foundation, this office shall, in turn, assign the request to the appropriate office for action within 60 days. In each instance, receipt of the request will be acknowledged in writing immediately by the office that has been assigned action. A request for classification review must reasonably describe the docu

(a) Information shall be declassified or downgraded as soon as national security considerations permit. The National Science Foundation shall coordinate their review of classified information with other agencies that have a direct interests in the subject matter. Information that continues to meet the classification requirements prescribed by Section 1.3 despite the passage of time will continue to be protected in accordance with Executive Order 12356.

(b) Foundation documents may be declassified or downgraded by the official who authorized the original classification, if that official is still serving in the same position; the originator's suc

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »