The Government's Classification of Private Ideas: Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, Ninety-sixth Congress, Second Session, February 28, March 20, and August 21, 1980
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Operations. Subcommittee on Government Information and Individual Rights
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1981 - Inventions - 842 pages
Other editions - View all
administrative Agreement amendment ASPAB Atomic Energy Act Atomic Energy Commission authority bill Captain ROBILLARD Chairman COLE Classification and Security classified information Commissioner of Patents committee compensation Congress contained contract Contractor copy Court of Claims cryptographic cryptology damages declassified defense agencies Department of Energy determination Director disclosed documents effect employees ERDA filed foreign Government interest Invention Secrecy Act inventor involved isotope separation issuance issued ITAR JNAI Proprietary Information Laboratory laser license ment military Moore Morland article national security National Security Agency Patent and Trademark patent application Patent Office personnel petition plaintiff PREYER prior restraint procedures proposal protection public domain pursuant QUARLES question Radioptics regulations renewal request Restricted Data Richardson Preyer SCIASCIA secrecy order secret Secretary SEWELL special nuclear material statute subcommittee subject matter technical TEGTMEYER thermonuclear tion Trademark Office unclassified United Washington
Page 273 - Thus we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.
Page 788 - The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to SCHNEIDER V.
Page 633 - The Contractor warrants that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee...
Page 632 - Contractor shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard and to offer evidence in support of its appeal. Pending final decision of a dispute hereunder, the Contractor shall proceed diligently with the performance of the contract and in accordance with the Contracting Officer's decision. (b) This "Disputes...
Page 632 - The decision of the Secretary or his duly authorized representative for the determination of such appeals shall be final and conclusive unless determined by a court of competent Jurisdiction to have been fraudulent, or capricious, or arbitrary, or so grossly erroneous as necessarily to imply bad faith, or not supported by substantial evidence.
Page 684 - Violations. An injunction or other court order may be obtained prohibiting any violation of any provision of the Act or any regulation or order issued thereunder. Any person who willfully violates, attempts to violate, or conspires to violate any provision of the Act or any regulation or order issued thereunder...
Page 817 - taking" may more readily be found when the interference with property can be characterized as a physical invasion by government than when interference arises from some public program adjusting the benefits and burdens of economic life to promote the common good.
Page 42 - If any provision of this Act, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this Act, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby.