Directors, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business 2. (2) a listing of the contract identification numbers pertinent provisions of Section 211 (above) but, when The foregoing ((1) and (2) above) should be furnished at the installation level to the SBA Procurement Center Representative (PCR) where there is such a person assigned as a resident by the SBA. Where there is no resident PCR assigned to the installation, the referenced documents (1) and (2) should be forwarded to the SBA Regional Administrator (attention ARA/RP) in the geographical area of the installation concerned. For civilian agencies, this will include contractual instruments issued from July 2, 1979 on, and for DOD the starting date will be from time of receipt of DAC 76-19 or September 1, 1979, whichever is earlier. Where remedial action consists of contract termination and resolicitation or where existing contracts are modified to include subcontracting plans required by Section 211 (above), SBA involvement in processing will be as in the case of new procurement actions. In the few cases where a determination is made that no remedial action should be taken, such determination should be in writing and signed by an appropriate official with a copy to the SBA PCR or Regional Administrator as in submitting (1) and (2) above. We recommend that the approving official be the head of the Acquisition Activity. By January 15, 1980, please furnish this office, on a total agency basis, a report indicating the number of items submitted in (1) and (2) above, the number and the total dollar amount remedied by category of remedy used and the number of cases remaining where action as yet has not been taken. Additional reports to SBA should be made on the 15th of each succeeding month until the action "as yet to be taken" figure is zero. Your cooperation in and understanding of the necessity for these unusual actions is appreciated. We feel that they serve our mutual mandate to maximize procurement opportunities for small business and small businesses owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. This memorandum has been coordinated with OFPP. (Signed) Bernard Kulk Bernard Kulik Associate Administrator for for FY 1980 for the Small and Disadvantaged Business Programs as required by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy's Policy Letter 79-3. Sincerely, Enor & Robert Enos E. Roberts Director Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization lar Amount $ Amount % of (1)$ Amount % of (1) % of (2) $ Amount % of (1)% of (2) $ Amount % of (1)% of (2) PROCEDURES FOR ARRIVING AT FY 1980 PROCUREMENT GOALS FOR SMALL AND DISADVANTAGED BUSINESSES The attached goals were developed at the bureau level and are based on the following: Anticipated budget projections with allowances made for Actual performance over the past two fiscal years and our Types of goods and services that are normally procured; Only certain sources have been able to provide the Depart- 22 percent of our total procurement dollars are expended Information concerning the ownership of concerns are not A goal of $6 million has been established for purchases FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 December 3, 1979 IN REPLY REFER TO: 2800 CN90112903211-KG Small Business Administration 1441 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20416 Attention: Mr. Edward Odell Dear Sir: Pursuant to OMB Policy Letter 79-3, September 7, 1979 attached hereto are the goals for Procurement awards to Small and Small Disadvantaged Businesses this agency has established for FY 1980. In further support of Public Law 95-507 we plan to examine all requirements during the remainder of this fiscal year in excess of $10,000.00 with a view toward achievements in excess of these goals. Per your request, attached are Standard Forms 37, Report on aitward R. D. Lichtwardt Attachment |