N&MCR COMPONENT DD Form 1390 Supplemental Data FY 1983 Military Construction, Naval Reserve Program Naval Air Station, Glenview, Ill Chief of Naval Reserve COMMAND ($000) A. Estimated Cost of Backlog of Real Property Maintenance (BMAR) (as of September 30, 1981): Permanent Facilities B. Similar Unused Space: 0 C. Outstanding Pollution and Safety (OSHA) Deficiencies: PROVIDE STORM WINDOWS ON 25 BUILDINGS TO REDUCE THE COEFFICIENT OF HEAT 11. REQUIREMENT: PROJECT: INSTALL STORM WINDOWS ON 25 BUILDINGS. REQUIREMENT: INSTALLING STORM WINDOWS WILL PROVIDE AN IMPROVED AREA TO ADDITIONAL: AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT. THE A. ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST TO OPERATE THE PROPOSED FACILITY... B. NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT N/A ($000) 0 C. ESTIMATED LIFE CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE 350 ($000) D. ESTIMATED LIFE CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE N/A ($000) F. 4. CONSTRUCTION START. EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT WHICH WILL BE PROVIDED FROM OTHER APPROPRIATIONS: Equipment Nomenclature None DD FORM 1 DEC 76 Cost 3-36b PAGE NO THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE FOR ENERGY CONSERVATION IN SEVERAL EXISTING BUILDINGS (BLDG NOS 2, 3, 8, 9, 11 AND 12). INCLUDED IS THE INSTALLATION OF CEILING AND PERIMETER INSULATION AND DOOR AND WINDOW WEATHERSTRIPPING. 11. PROJECT. PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES IN EXISTING BUILDINGS. REQUIREMENT: EXECUTIVE ORDER 12003 OF 20 JULY 1977 REQUIRES A 20 PERCENT REDUCTION IN ENERGY USE IN EXISTING FEDERAL BUILDINGS BY FISCAL YEAR 1985 AS MEASURED AGAINST THE BASELINE USAGE IN FISCAL YEAR 1975. CURRENT SITUATION: THE SIX BUILDINGS INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT WERE CONSTRUCTED AS SEMI-PERMANENT STRUCTURES IN THE EARLY 1940S. THE WOOD FRAME STRUCTURES ARE UNINSULATED AND CONSEQUENTLY WASTE A LARGE AMOUNT OF ENERGY DURING THE HEATING AND COOLING SEASONS. THESE BUILDINGS ARE USED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE SPACES, TRAINING, MEDICAL AND DENTAL CARE, AND ENLISTED AND OFFICER LIVING QUARTERS. IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: THE BUILDINGS WILL CONTINUE TO WASTE ENERGY WHICH CONTRIBUTES TO HIGH UTILITY BILLS FOR THE STATION AND LOW MORALE DUE TO PERSONNEL DISCOMFORT. ADDITIONAL: AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT. FOR THE INSULATION THE SAVINGS-TO-INVESTMENT RATIO (SIR) IS 2.48 AND THE ENERGY SAVINGS-TO-INVESTMENT RATIO (ESIR) IS 26.4 WITH A PAYBACK PERIOD OF 7.6 YEARS OVER A 25 YEAR ECONOMIC LIFE. FOR THE WEATHERSTRIPPING THE SIR IS 1.67, ESIR 17.8 WITH A PAYBACK OF 11.4 YEARS. |