Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

AUTHORITY: The provisions of this Part 785 issued under 52 Stat. 1060; 29 U.S.C. 201-219. SOURCES: The provisions of this Part 785 appear at 26 F.R. 190, Jan. 11, 1961, unless as otherwise

noted.

Subpart A-GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

Section 785.1-INTRODUCTORY

STATEMENT.

Section 6 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206) requires that each employee, not specifically exempted, who is engaged in commerce, or in the production of goods for commerce, or who is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce, or in the production of goods for commerce receive a specified minimum wage. Section 7 of the Act (29 U.S.C. 207) provides that persons may not be employed for more than a stated number of hours a week without receiving at least one and one-half times their regular rate of pay for the overtime hours. The amount of money an employee should receive cannot be determined without knowing the number of hours he has worked. This part discusses the principles involved in determining what constitutes working time. It also seeks to apply these principles to situations that frequently arise. It cannot include every possible situation. No inference should be drawn from the fact that a subject or an illustration is omitted. If doubt arises inquiries should be sent to the Administrator of the Wage and Hour and Public Contracts Divisions, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., 20210, or to any Regional Office of the Divisions. A list of such offices is contained in Section 785.51.

[26 F.R. 7732, Aug. 18, 1961]

Section 785.2-DECISIONS ON INTERPRETATIONS; USE OF INTERPRETATIONS.

The ultimate decisions on interpretations of the act are made by the courts. The Adminis

trator must determine in the first instance the positions he will take in the enforcement of the act. The regulations in this part seek to inform the public of such positions. It should thus provide a "practical guide for employers and employees as to how the office representing the public interest in its enforcement will seek to apply it." (Skidmore v. Swift, 323 U.S. 134, 138 (1944))

Section 785.3-PERIOD OF EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERPRETATIONS.

These interpretations will remain in effect until they are rescinded, modified or withdrawn. This will be done when and if the Administrator concludes upon re-examination, or in the light of judicial decision, that a particular interpretation, ruling or enforcement policy is incorrect or unwarranted. All other rulings, interpretations or enforcement policies inconsistent with any portion of this part are superseded by it. The Portal-to-Portal Bulletin (Part 790 of this chapter) is still in effect except insofar as it may not be consistent with any portion hereof. The applicable statutory provisions are set forth in § 785.50.

Section 785.4-APPLICATION TO WALSHHEALEY PUBLIC CONTRACTS ACT.

The principles set forth in this part are also followed by the Administrator of the Wage and Hour and Public Contracts Divisions in determining hours worked by employees performing work subject to the provisions of the Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act.

Subpart B-PRINCIPLES FOR DETERMINATION OF HOURS

WORKED

Section 785.5-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS 6 AND 7 OF THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT. Section 6 requires the payment of a minimum wage by an employer to his employees who are

subject to the act. Section 7 prohibits their employment for more than a specified number of hours per week without proper overtime compensation.

[26 F.R. 7732, Aug. 18, 1961]

Section 785.6-DEFINITION OF "EMPLOY" AND PARTIAL DEFINITION OF "HOURS WORKED".

By statutory definition the term "employ" includes (section 3 (g)) "to suffer or permit to work." The act, however, contains no definition of "work." Section 3 (o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act contains a partial definition of "hours worked" in the form of a limited exception for clothes-changing and wash-up time.

Section 785.7—JUDICIAL

CONSTRUCTION.

The United States Supreme Court originally stated that employees subject to the act must be paid for all time spent in "physical or mental exertion (whether burdensome or not) controlled or required by the employer and pursued necessarily and primarily for the benefit of the employer or his business." (Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad Co. v. Muscoda Local No. 123, 321 U.S. 590 (1944).) Subsequently, the Court ruled that there need be no exertion at all and that all hours are hours worked which the employee is required to give his employer, that "an employer, if he chooses, may hire a man to do nothing, or to do nothing but wait for something to happen. Refraining from other activity often is a factor of instant readiness to serve, and idleness plays a part in all employments in a stand-by capacity. Readiness to serve may be hired, quite as much as service itself, and time spent lying in wait for threats to the safety of the employer's property may be treated by the parties as a benefit to the employer." (Armour & Co. v. Wantock, 323 U.S. 126 (1944); Skidmore v. Swift, 323 U.S. 134 (1944).) The workweek ordinarily includes "all time during which an employee is necessarily required to be on the employer's premises, on duty or at a prescribed work place." (Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680 (1946).) The Portal-to-Portal Act did not change the rule except to provide an exception for preliminary and postliminary activities. See 8785.34.

[blocks in formation]

Section 785.9 STATUTORY
EXCEPTIONS.

(a) The Portal-to-Portal Act. The Portaito-Portal Act (secs. 1-13, 61 Stat. 84-89, 29 U.S.C. 251-262) eliminates from working time certain travel and walking time and other similar "preliminary" and "postliminary" activities performed "prior" or "subsequent" to the "workday" that are not made compensable by contract, custom, or practice. It should be noted that "preliminary" activities do not include "principal" activities. See §§ 790.6 to 790.8 of this chapter. Section 4 of the Portalto-Portal Act does not affect the computation of hours worked within the "workday." "Workday," in general, means the period between "the time on any particular workday at which such employee commences [his] principal activity or activities" and "the time on any particular workday at which he ceases such principal activity or activities." The "workday" may thus be longer than the employee's scheduled shift, hours, tour of duty, or time on the production line. Also, its duration may vary from day to day depending upon when the employee comor ceases his "principal" activities. With respect to time spent in any "preliminary" or "post liminary" activity compensable by contract, custom, or practice, the Portal-to-Portal Act requires that such time must also be counted for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act. There are, however, limitations on this requirement. The "preliminary" or "post liminary" activity in question must be engaged in during the portion of the day with respect to which it is made compensable by the contract, custom, or practice. Also, only the amount of time allowed by the contract or under the custom or

mences

practice is required to be counted. If, for example, the time allowed is 15 minutes but the activity takes 25 minutes, the time to be added to other working time would be limited to 15 minutes. (Galvin v. National Biscuit Co., 82 F. Supp. 535 (S.D.N.Y. 1949) appeal dismissed, 177 F. 2d 963 (C.A. 2, 1949))

(b) Section 3(0) of the Fair Labor Stand

t

ards Act. Section 3 (0) gives statutory effect, as explained in § 785.26, to the exclusion from measured working time of certain clotheschanging and washing time at the beginning or the end of the workday by the parties to collective bargaining agreements.

[30 F.R. 9911, Aug. 10, 1965]

Subpart C-APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES

Section 785.10 SCOPE OF SUBPART. This subpart applies the principles to the problems which arise frequently.

[ocr errors]

EMPLOYEES "SUFFERED OR
PERMITTED" TO WORK

Section 785.11-GENERAL.

Work not requested but suffered or permitted is work time. For example, an employee may voluntarily continue to work at the end of the shift. He may be a pieceworker, he may desire to finish an assigned task or he may wish to correct errors, paste work tickets, prepare time reports or other records. The reason is immaterial. The employer knows or has reason to believe that he is continuing to work and the time is working time. (Handler v. Thrasher, 191 F. 2d 120 (C.A. 10, 1951); Republican Publishing Co. v. American Newspaper Guild, 172 F. 2d 943 (C.A. 1, 1949); Kappler v. Republic Pictures Corp., 59 F. Supp. 112 (S.D. Iowa 1945), aff'd 151 F. 2d 543 (C.A. 8, 1945); 327 U.S. 757 (1946); Hogue v. National Automotive Parts Ass'n, 87 F. Supp. 816 (E.D. Mich. 1949); Barker v. Georgia Power & Light Co., 2 W.H. Cases 486; 5 CCH Labor Cases, para. 61,095 (M.D. Ga. 1942); Steger v. Beard & Stone Electric Co., Inc., 1 W.H. Cases 593; 4 Labor Cases 60,643 (N.D. Texas 1941))

Section 785.12-WORK PERFORMED AWAY FROM THE PREMISES OR JOB SITE.

The rule is also applicable to work performed away from the premises or the job site, or even at home. If the employer knows or has reason

to believe that the work is being performed, he must count the time as hours worked. Section 785.13-DUTY OF MANAGEMENT.

In all such cases it is the duty of the management to exercise its control and see that the work is not performed if it does not want it to be performed. It cannot sit back and accept the benefits without compensating for them. The mere promulgation of a rule against such work is not enough. Management has the power to enforce the rule and must make every effort to do so.

WAITING TIME

Section 785.14-GENERAL.

Whether waiting time is time worked under the act depends upon particular circumstances. The determination involves "scrutiny and construction of the agreements between particular parties, appraisal of their practical construction of the working agreement by conduct, consideration of the nature of the service, and its relation to the waiting time, and all of the circumstances. Facts may show that the employee was engaged to wait, or they may show that he waited to be engaged." (Skidmore v. Swift, 323 U.S. 134 (1944)) Such questions "must be determined in accordance with common sense and the general concept of work or employment." (Central Mo. Tel. Co. v. Conwell, 170 F. 2d 641 (C.A. 8, 1948))

Section 785.15-ON DUTY.

A stenographer who reads a book while waiting for dictation, a messenger who works a crossword puzzle while awaiting assignments,

« PreviousContinue »