BY THE U.S. GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE Committee On Education And Labor House Of Representatives Federally Supported Centers Provide Needed Services For Runaways And Homeless Youths This report summarizes the results of our review of the Runaway and Homeless Youth Program authorized under title III of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, as amended. As you requested, we examined the services offered by centers for runaways and homeless youths, the characteristics of the youths served, the environment of the centers, and perceptions of service and operations from youths, parents, staff, and community service people. As requested, we testified on our findings for your Subcommittee on May 5, 1982. As We sought comments on the report from the U.S. Department Sincerely, Cena Chili Eleanor Chelimsky GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE REPORT TO THE CHAIRMAN SUBCOMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESOURCES FEDERALLY SUPPORTED CENTERS Tear Sheet DIGEST The Runaway and Homeless Youth Act authorizes At the request of the Chairman of the Subcommit- --Who participates in the Program? --What services does it offer? --What is the environment of the centers? --What do the youths and their families, the staff To answer these questions, GAO visited 17 runaway GAO/IPE-83-7 SEPTEMBER 26, 1983 residents, administrative and counseling staff members, and community service personnel--that is, people in the social service agencies, the juvenile justice system, the police departments, and the schools. WHO WERE THE YOUTHS The majority of the youths who were given shelter at the 17 centers had come from the immediate geographic area. They had been referred to a center by social service agencies, juvenile justice authorities, police, or school personnel and had been brought there by them or by parents or other relatives. They had not resided at that center before. (pp. 6-8) Most of the centers did not admit psychotic, violent, and drug-addicted youths. At the majority of the centers, staff members' estimates of the percentage of their clients who had been physically abused were in the range of 20 to 40 percent. Their estimates of sexual abuse were in the range of 8 percent or less, and their estimates of those who had been victims of parental neglect were in the range of 14 to 35 percent. (pp. 6-7) WHAT WERE THE SERVICES Center staff and community service personnel believed that the centers met the youths' most pressing needs by providing them with shelter and counseling and by helping their families get involved in solving their problems. All the centers engaged in a variety of outreach activities, including advertising and making speeches and school contacts, but only three conducted outreach activities on the streets where the runaways and homeless youths congregated. (pp. 9-11) Centers are intended to be short-term residential facilities. Program regulations establish the maximum number of days of temporary shelter at Runaways stayed an average of 15 days or less at all centers; homeless youths stayed an average of 15 days or less at all but 4 centers. These 4 reported an average length of stay for homeless youths ranging from 25 to 32 days. centers that reported long periods of residence for homeless youths especially noted the insuf |