United States-Soviet Grain Agreement, S. 2492, and Other Matters: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on International Finance of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session, on S. 2492 ... December 9 and 10, 1975 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 39
Page
... Department of State_ 65 Richard E. Bell , Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Affairs and Commodity Programs , Department of Agriculture_ 112 Herbert S. LeVine and Donald W. Green , consultants , Stanford Research Institute ...
... Department of State_ 65 Richard E. Bell , Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Affairs and Commodity Programs , Department of Agriculture_ 112 Herbert S. LeVine and Donald W. Green , consultants , Stanford Research Institute ...
Page 19
... Department of Agriculture should be committed not to sell any stocks it might acquire at less than the higher of 110 % of parity or the market price , thus reinforcing the incentive for farmers to hold reserves in storage at times of ...
... Department of Agriculture should be committed not to sell any stocks it might acquire at less than the higher of 110 % of parity or the market price , thus reinforcing the incentive for farmers to hold reserves in storage at times of ...
Page 34
... Departments for their own particular purposes without regard for the interests of the farmers who produced the grain . Cash prices for wheat and corn are significantly lower than they were at this time in 1974 . One of our major ...
... Departments for their own particular purposes without regard for the interests of the farmers who produced the grain . Cash prices for wheat and corn are significantly lower than they were at this time in 1974 . One of our major ...
Page 46
... Department of Agriculture is to let the market allocate the supply of grain . " He went on to say that the De- partment " views this ( agreement ) not as an allocation of U.S. grain , but as a Soviet commitment to buy a minimum of U.S. ...
... Department of Agriculture is to let the market allocate the supply of grain . " He went on to say that the De- partment " views this ( agreement ) not as an allocation of U.S. grain , but as a Soviet commitment to buy a minimum of U.S. ...
Page 55
... Department of Agriculture to task for some of its projection errors . For the last couple of years , there has been a joint Soviet - American Committee on Cooperation in Agriculture , which meets alternatively in the U.S.S.R. and the ...
... Department of Agriculture to task for some of its projection errors . For the last couple of years , there has been a joint Soviet - American Committee on Cooperation in Agriculture , which meets alternatively in the U.S.S.R. and the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Administration AGOR agreed agricultural allocate Annex bilateral carriage Charterers commitment commodities CONGRESS THE LIBRARY consumers control solution controlled cargo countries crop Designated Representatives Developed West discharge domestic ECONOMETRIC MODEL effect END-USE estimate export controls farm foreign freight grain agreement grain reserves grain trade imports industry International Wheat Council LIBRARY OF CONGRESS liner long ton long-term MARCUSS maritime market price ment million metric tons million tons negotiated output owner Party percent period problem production Professor GREEN projections question responsibility ROBINSON ROGERS C. B. MORTON Rubles Russians scenario sector Senator STEVENSON ship shortages Soviet economy Soviet grain Soviet purchases Soviet Socialist Republics Soviet Union SOVMOD soybeans SRI-WEFA Stanford Research Institute storage supply TOTAL CONSUMPTION TRANSPORT/COMMUNICATION U.S. dollar U.S. Government U.S. grain U.S. ports Union of Soviet United USSR variables wheat and corn world food World Food Conference world market
Popular passages
Page 106 - This bill of lading shall have effect subject to the provisions of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act of the United States, approved April 16, 1936, which shall be deemed to be incorporated herein, and nothing herein contained shall be deemed a surrender by the carrier of any of its rights or immunities or an increase of any of its responsibilities or liabilities under said Act.
Page 91 - ... any refuse matter of any kind or description whatever other than that flowing from streets and sewers and passing therefrom in a liquid state, into any navigable water of the United States, or into any tributary of any navigable water from which the same shall float or be washed into such navigable water...
Page 104 - Commotions or of a Strike or Lock-out of any class of workmen essential to the loading of the Cargo, or by reason of...
Page 87 - The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended by the "Water Quality Improvement Act of 1970," requires evidence of financial responsibility regarding reimbursement for pollution damage caused by a vessel.
Page 92 - The owner, agent, master, or person in charge of a vessel involved in a marine casualty shall give notice as soon as possible to the nearest marine inspection office of the...
Page 106 - That should any dispute arise between Owners and the Charterers, the matter in dispute shall be referred to three persons at New York, one to be appointed by each of the parties hereto, and the third by the two so chosen; their decision or that of any two of them, shall be final, and for the purpose of enforcing any award, this agreement may be made a rule of the Court. The Arbitrators shall be commercial men.
Page 91 - Government for the actual costs incurred under subsection (c) for the removal of such oil or substance by the United States Government in an amount not to exceed $100 per gross ton of such vessel or $14,000,000, whichever is lesser, except...
Page 81 - In witness whereof, the undersigned, duly authorized by their respective Governments, have signed...
Page 87 - ... be established to meet the maximum liability to which the largest of such vessels could be subjected. Financial responsibility may be established by any one of, or a combination of, the following methods acceptable to the President : (A) evidence of insurance, (B) surety bonds, (C) qualification as a self-insurer, or (D) other evidence of financial responsibility. Any bond filed shall be issued by a bonding company authorized to do business in the United States.
Page 92 - Damage to property in excess of $1,500.00. (2) Material damage affecting the seaworthiness or efficiency of a vessel. (3) Stranding or grounding. (4) Loss of life. (5) Injury causing any person to remain incapacitated for a period in excess of 72 hours; except injury to harbor workers not resulting in death and not resulting from vessel casualty or vessel equipment casualty.