Understanding Evil: An Interdisciplinary Approach
Margaret Sönser Breen
Rodopi, 2003 - History - 222 pages
Written across the disciplines of law, literature, philosophy, and theology,Understanding Evil: An Interdisciplinary Approach represents wide-ranging approaches to and understandings of “evil” and “wickedness.”Consisting of three sections – “Grappling with Evil,” “Justice, Responsibility, and War” and “Blame, Murder, and Retributivism,” - all the essays are inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary in focus. Common themes emerge around the dominant narrative movements of grieving, loss, powerlessness, and retribution that have shaped so many political and cultural issues around the world since the fall of 2001. At the same time, the interdisciplinary nature of this collection, together with the divergent views of its chapters, reminds one that, in the end, an inquiry into “evil” and “wickedness” is at its best when it promotes intelligence and compassion, creativity and cooperation.The thirteen essays are originally presented at and then developed in light of dialogues held at the Third Global Conference on Perspectives on Evil and Human Wickedness, held in March 2002 in Prague.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Catheter of Bilious Hatred
The View of Warfare
International Justice Intervention and
Terrorism and Just War Theory
A New Understanding of Wickedness
Evolutionary Origins of the Imperative to Inflict
Narratives of Charles Brockden Brown
accept actions adaptive allow argues argument attacks authority become behaviours believe Brown cause century chapter Christian circumstances claim committed concept concerned consequences consequentialist considered context crime criminal cultural death define definition discussion effect evil example existence fact feel follows further give guilt harm human rights idea imagination important individuals innocent interest internal intervention involve justice justified Kant kill kind Kohlhaas least Macbeth means military moral motivated murder nature never Notes notion objection obligation particular person philosophical political position practice present Press principle problem punishment question Rawls reason reciprocity representatives reproduce requires responsibility result retribution Roberts rules seems sense sexual simply social society soldiers story suffering suggests terrorism terrorist theory things thought true turn understanding University violations violence wrong York
Page 9 - He's here in double trust: First, as I am his kinsman and his subject, Strong both against the deed; then, as his host. Who should against his murderer shut the door, Not bear the knife myself.
Page 6 - This is the excellent foppery of the world, that, when we are sick in fortune, — often the surfeit of our own behaviour, — we make guilty of our disasters the sun, the moon, and the stars: as if we were villains by necessity; fools by heavenly compulsion; knaves, thieves, and treachers, by spherical predominance; drunkards, liars, and adulterers, by an enforced obedience of planetary influence; and all that we are evil in, by a divine thrusting on...
Page 8 - tis done, then 'twere well It were done quickly: If the assassination Could trammel up the consequence, and catch, 'With his surcease, success ; that but this blow Might be the be-all and the end-all here. But here, upon this bank and shoal of time, — We'd jump the life to come...
Page 9 - Besides, this Duncan Hath borne his faculties so meek, hath been So clear in his great office, that his virtues Will plead like angels, trumpet-tongued, against The deep damnation of his taking-off...
Page 1 - Except for an extraordinary diligence in looking out for his personal advancement, he had no motives at all. And this diligence in itself was in no way criminal; he certainly would never have murdered his superior in order to inherit his post. He merely, to put the matter colloquially, never realized what he was doing.