Pieces of Mind: The Proper Domain of Psychological Predicates

Front Cover
Oxford University Press, Apr 26, 2018 - Science - 240 pages
Psychological terms are widely used to describe the biological world: plants, insects, bacteria colonies, even single cells are described as making decisions, anticipating rewards, and communicating with language. Carrie Figdor presents a comprehensive critical assessment of the interpretation of psychological terms across biological domains. She argues that we interpret these descriptions as literal claims about the capacities of such beings, and she argues against the anthropocentric attitude which takes human cognition as the standard for full-blooded capacities, to which nonhuman capacities are compared and found wanting. She offers an alternative view of what is required for a naturalistic explanation of the mind, and promotes finding a non-anthropocentric framework for determining distinctions in moral status. This is the first book to give a comprehensive theory of the interpretation of mental language throughout biology and to emphasize the role of mathematical modeling in the spread and revision of concepts.
 

Contents

Introduction
1
Cases Qualitative Analogy
12
Cases Quantitative Analogy
31
Literalism An Initial Defense
60
The Nonsense View
89
The Metaphor View
105
The Technical View
129
Literalism and Mechanistic Explanation
147
Literalism and Moral Status
166
Concluding Summary
184
Bibliography
189
Index
215
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2018)

Carrie Figdor is Associate Professor in the Department of Philosophy and Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Neuroscience at the University of Iowa. Her work has appeared in The Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy of Science, Mind & Language, Frontiers in Communication, and other leading scholarly journals. Her main philosophical interests are in philosophy of mind, philosophy of science, philosophy of neuroscience, philosophy of language, and metaphysics. A former newswoman with The Associated Press, she also writes on issues in science communication.

Bibliographic information