A Legislative History of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and Its Amendments, Volume 11U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1979 - Cosmetics |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 23
Page 123
... Plea : Nolo contendere . Fine of $ 1,000 sus- pended , defendant placed on probation for 1 year . Mar. 1 , 1915. Plea : guilty . Fine $ 600 . 6 months jail sentence suspended ; 2 years probation . May 21 , 1945. Plea : guilty . Fines as ...
... Plea : Nolo contendere . Fine of $ 1,000 sus- pended , defendant placed on probation for 1 year . Mar. 1 , 1915. Plea : guilty . Fine $ 600 . 6 months jail sentence suspended ; 2 years probation . May 21 , 1945. Plea : guilty . Fines as ...
Page 124
... Plea : Nolo contendere as to counts I to IX ; counts X to XVII nolle prosse on record of the United States attorney . Saul Cohen , individual , case dismissed on order of the court . Fine : $ 200 each of 9 counts ; total fine $ 1,800 ...
... Plea : Nolo contendere as to counts I to IX ; counts X to XVII nolle prosse on record of the United States attorney . Saul Cohen , individual , case dismissed on order of the court . Fine : $ 200 each of 9 counts ; total fine $ 1,800 ...
Page 125
... Plea : Nolo contendere . Firm fined $ 1,000 . Individual fined $ 250 ; total fine , $ 1,250 . Oct. 5 , 1919. Plea : Guilty ; $ 100 fine on cach of 6 counts against both defendants ; total fine , $ 600 . Oct. 5 , 1949 . fine , $ 700 ...
... Plea : Nolo contendere . Firm fined $ 1,000 . Individual fined $ 250 ; total fine , $ 1,250 . Oct. 5 , 1919. Plea : Guilty ; $ 100 fine on cach of 6 counts against both defendants ; total fine , $ 600 . Oct. 5 , 1949 . fine , $ 700 ...
Page 126
... Plea : Guilty . Fine of $ 50 generally on counts 1 to 7 , inclusive . March 17 , 1950 , Plea : Guilty . Fine of $ 100 on each of 8 counts ; total Ane , $ 500 , March 21 , 1950. Plen of nolo contendere to counts I , III , VI , VIII , IX ...
... Plea : Guilty . Fine of $ 50 generally on counts 1 to 7 , inclusive . March 17 , 1950 , Plea : Guilty . Fine of $ 100 on each of 8 counts ; total Ane , $ 500 , March 21 , 1950. Plen of nolo contendere to counts I , III , VI , VIII , IX ...
Page 127
... Plea : Guilty by Clayton on 8 counts ; guilty by Calmes on 1 count . Fine of $ 25 on each of 8 counts against ... Plea : Nolo contendere . Fine of $ 50 on count 1 against D. Hernandez and $ 50 each on counts 2 and 3 against M. Capestany ...
... Plea : Guilty by Clayton on 8 counts ; guilty by Calmes on 1 count . Fine of $ 25 on each of 8 counts against ... Plea : Nolo contendere . Fine of $ 50 on count 1 against D. Hernandez and $ 50 each on counts 2 and 3 against M. Capestany ...
Contents
271 | |
273 | |
312 | |
321 | |
353 | |
357 | |
360 | |
361 | |
24 | |
27 | |
28 | |
29 | |
61 | |
68 | |
101 | |
169 | |
175 | |
215 | |
256 | |
262 | |
264 | |
271 | |
365 | |
466 | |
523 | |
557 | |
636 | |
662 | |
690 | |
691 | |
693 | |
697 | |
699 | |
703 | |
705 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administer such drug Administrative Procedure Act agency AMEND FEDERAL FOOD amend section 503 aspirin authority barbital barbiturates BECKWORTH Benzedrine bill Chairman Congress COSMETIC ACT counter counts court of appeals CREEVY dangerous drugs determination Dexedrine doctor Drug Administration drug manufacturers Drug Store effect efficacy epilepsy Ewing exemption Federal Security Administrator Federal Security Agency filed FISCHELIS Food and Drug gentleman yield HARROP HESELTON House interested labeling LARRICK law to administer legislation licensed by law medicine ment misbranded Nembutal nolo contendere O'HARA opinion oral prescription over-the-counter over-the-counter drugs paragraph patient Pharmaceutical Association pharmacist pharmacy phenobarbital physician Plea practice practitioner licensed prescribed prescription drugs prescription legend present law professional proposed provisions public health question record refilling of prescriptions regulations requirements restricted Retail Druggists scription section 502 Senator HUMPHREY Senator LEHMAN Senator NEELY sold statement supervision tion trial de novo veterinarian WALLER WARNACK WILLIAMS of Mississippi WOLVERTON written prescription
Popular passages
Page 271 - To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an agency action.
Page 175 - In making the foregoing determinations the court shall review the whole record or such portions thereof as may be cited by any party, and due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error.
Page 271 - ... (e) Scope of review So far as necessary to decision and where presented the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of any agency action.
Page 32 - States for the circuit wherein such person resides or has his principal place of business, for a judicial review of such order.
Page 347 - The study shall incorporate guidelines which are consistent with criteria provided in resolutions adopted by the Committee on Labor and Public Welfare of the United States Senate or the Committee on Education and Labor of the United States House of Representatives, or both.
Page 385 - ... generally recognized, among experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate its safety, as having been adequately shown through scientific procedures (or, in the case of a substance used in food prior to January 1, 1958.
Page 421 - If it is dangerous to health when used in the dosage, or with the frequency or duration prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the labeling thereof.
Page 247 - ... (b) (1) A drug intended for use by man which — (A) is a habit-forming drug to which section 502 (d) applies; or (B) because of its toxicity or other potentiality for harmful effect, or the method of its use, or the collateral measures necessary to its use, is not safe for use except under the supervision of a practitioner licensed by law to administer such drug...
Page 235 - Nor does it mean that even as to matters not requiring expertise a court may displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo.
Page 271 - A food shall be deemed to be adulterated— (a) (1) If it bears or contains any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health...