A Legislative History of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and Its Amendments, Volume 11
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, 1979 - Cosmetics
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action Administrator agency AMEND FEDERAL FOOD amendment American answer appeals apply Association authority bear believe bill Chairman committee Congress contained correct COSMETIC ACT counter counts court dangerous decision definition determination directions dispensed doctor Drug Administration druggist effect evidence Ewing exemption experts fact FEDERAL FOOD filed follows Food and Drug give given hearing House interested labeling LARRICK legend legislation manufacturer matter mean medicine Michigan necessary O'HARA objection opinion oral paragraph patient person Pharmaceutical pharmacist pharmacy physician practice prescribed prescription present problem procedure professional proposed protection provisions question reason record referred refilling regulations Representatives requirements respect responsibility restricted retail rule safe section 502 Security sell Senator Senator HUMPHREY sold standard statement supervision thing tion United writing written yield
Page 277 - To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an agency action.
Page 273 - ... (e) Scope of review So far as necessary to decision and where presented the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of any agency action.
Page 32 - States for the circuit wherein such person resides or has his principal place of business, for a judicial review of such order.
Page 359 - The study shall incorporate guidelines which are consistent with criteria provided in resolutions adopted by the Committee on Labor and Public Welfare of the United States Senate or the Committee on Education and Labor of the United States House of Representatives, or both.
Page 397 - ... generally recognized, among experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate its safety, as having been adequately shown through scientific procedures (or, in the case of a substance used in food prior to January 1, 1958.
Page 433 - If it is dangerous to health when used in the dosage, or with the frequency or duration prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the labeling thereof.
Page 259 - ... (b) (1) A drug intended for use by man which — (A) is a habit-forming drug to which section 502 (d) applies; or (B) because of its toxicity or other potentiality for harmful effect, or the method of its use, or the collateral measures necessary to its use, is not safe for use except under the supervision of a practitioner licensed by law to administer such drug...
Page 247 - Nor does it mean that even as to matters not requiring expertise a court may displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo.