United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Volume 406U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973 - Courts |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 1
... the dispute here at issue , and neither the contract between the parties nor the Wunderlich Act permitted still further administrative review by the GAO . Pp . 1 Opinion of the Court 406 U.S. 2. The Wunderlich Act 8-12 .
... the dispute here at issue , and neither the contract between the parties nor the Wunderlich Act permitted still further administrative review by the GAO . Pp . 1 Opinion of the Court 406 U.S. 2. The Wunderlich Act 8-12 .
Page 15
... parties ; they entail the public interest : " [ W ] here a suit in equity concerns the public interest as well as the private interests of the liti- gants this doctrine assumes even wider and more significant proportions . For if an ...
... parties ; they entail the public interest : " [ W ] here a suit in equity concerns the public interest as well as the private interests of the liti- gants this doctrine assumes even wider and more significant proportions . For if an ...
Page 21
... parties may voluntarily settle the dispute . If they do , that is the end of the matter . If no settlement is reached , the disputed matters are decided by the agency's contracting officer . If the contractor does not appeal to the ...
... parties may voluntarily settle the dispute . If they do , that is the end of the matter . If no settlement is reached , the disputed matters are decided by the agency's contracting officer . If the contractor does not appeal to the ...
Page 24
... parties . Although in terms the disputes clauses pre- cluded judicial review of disputes decisions , this Court beginning in 1878 consistently held that the finality of a disputes decision could be challenged in court by either party on ...
... parties . Although in terms the disputes clauses pre- cluded judicial review of disputes decisions , this Court beginning in 1878 consistently held that the finality of a disputes decision could be challenged in court by either party on ...
Page 25
... parties unless the challenger proved in court that the deciding Government official was guilty of " conscious wrongdoing , an intention to cheat or be dishonest . " United States v . Wunderlich , 342 U. S. 98 , 100 ( 1951 ) ...
... parties unless the challenger proved in court that the deciding Government official was guilty of " conscious wrongdoing , an intention to cheat or be dishonest . " United States v . Wunderlich , 342 U. S. 98 , 100 ( 1951 ) ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Accounting Office action AFDC agency amicus curiae Amish applied argued the cause Arndstein Attorney authority bargaining bill BLACKMUN Board broadcast C. A. 5th Cir California CATV Certiorari denied Comm'n Commission commitment compelled conclusion concurring Cong Congress constitutional contractor Corp counsel Court of Appeals criminal defendant disputes clause disputes decision dissenting 406 U.S. District Court doctrine employees federal filed Fourteenth Amendment fraud Government granted habeas corpus held Illinois immunity interest issue judgment judicial review jurisdiction jury JUSTICE BRENNAN JUSTICE DOUGLAS JUSTICE POWELL Labor legislative Louisiana ment mixed-bloods natural gas NLRB parties patent petitioner petitioner's POWELL programs prosecution protection question reason regulation REHNQUIST Reported respondent rule Sabbatino Senate Sess Sixth Amendment Stat State's statute statutory Supp supra testimony Texas tion transactional immunity trial U. S. App unanimous union United venue laws Wackenhut witness Wunderlich Act
Popular passages
Page 231 - The fundamental theory of liberty upon which all governments in this Union repose excludes any general power of the State to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. The child is not the mere creature of the State; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations.
Page 294 - Representatives designated or selected for the purposes of collective bargaining by the majority of the employees in a unit appropriate for such purposes, shall be the exclusive representatives of all the employees in such unit for the purposes of collective bargaining in respect to rates of pay, wages, hours of employment, or other conditions of employment...
Page 648 - For the purpose of regulating interstate and foreign commerce in communication by wire and radio so as to make available, so far as possible, to all the people of the United States a rapid, efficient, Nation-wide, and world-wide wire and radio communication service with adequate facilities at reasonable charges...
Page 143 - It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, 1.
Page 638 - ... keeping open for public inspection new schedules stating plainly the change or changes to be made in the schedule or schedules then in force and the time when the change or changes will go into effect. The Commission, for good cause shown, may allow changes to take effect without requiring the thirty days...
Page 176 - We doubt very much whether any action of a State not directed, by way of discrimination, against the negroes as a class, or on account of their race, will ever be held to come within the purview of this provision.
Page 617 - Federal regulation in matters relating to the transportation of natural gas and the sale thereof in interstate and foreign commerce is necessary in the public interest. (b) The provisions of this act shall apply to the transportation of natural gas in interstate commerce, to the sale in interstate commerce of natural gas for resale for ultimate public consumption...
Page 176 - State legislatures are presumed to have acted within their constitutional power despite the fact that, in practice, their laws result in some inequality. A statutory discrimination will not be set aside if any state of facts reasonably may be conceived to justify it.
Page 231 - Under the doctrine of Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390. we think it entirely plain that the Act of 1922 unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians to direct the upbringing and education of children under their control.
Page 143 - ... to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading...