Cases in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Third Circuit: With an Appendix, Volume 1 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 27
... Opinion or belief may be assumed , whether it exist or not : and if this mere opinion of the sailors will justify them in making a sacrifice of the passengers , of course , the mere opinion of the passengers would , in turn , jus- tify ...
... Opinion or belief may be assumed , whether it exist or not : and if this mere opinion of the sailors will justify them in making a sacrifice of the passengers , of course , the mere opinion of the passengers would , in turn , jus- tify ...
Page 46
... OPINION evidence , a Court , generally speaking , is not ex- treme in its requirements ; especially where , as in this case , the evidence comes through the channels of a foreign language and a foreign commission . In such cases ...
... OPINION evidence , a Court , generally speaking , is not ex- treme in its requirements ; especially where , as in this case , the evidence comes through the channels of a foreign language and a foreign commission . In such cases ...
Page 53
... OPINION . October 15th . 1843 . THE COURT'S October 15th . OPINION . OCT WILCOCKS VS. FHILLIPS ' EXECUTORS . 53.
... OPINION . October 15th . 1843 . THE COURT'S October 15th . OPINION . OCT WILCOCKS VS. FHILLIPS ' EXECUTORS . 53.
Page 70
... opinion in that case , CHIEF JUSTICE TILGHMAN , speaking of the proprietary , said : " No doubt he retained the entire right of the river and of every thing in the river , in order that he might make such use of it as would be most ...
... opinion in that case , CHIEF JUSTICE TILGHMAN , speaking of the proprietary , said : " No doubt he retained the entire right of the river and of every thing in the river , in order that he might make such use of it as would be most ...
Page 71
... opinion of the Court upon a point respecting rivers , argued against one of the parties ' rights , because if he had such rights in the river he " would have a right to the islands also , contrary to universal opinion and practice ...
... opinion of the Court upon a point respecting rivers , argued against one of the parties ' rights , because if he had such rights in the river he " would have a right to the islands also , contrary to universal opinion and practice ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3d Point action Admiralty admitted American appeared APRIL SESSIONS Arbitrator argument Aspden authority bond bound boundaries canal Captain Castle channel charter Chief Justice Circuit Court claim common law counsel COURT'S OPINION creditors crown debts decided decision declarations deed defendant Dela Delaware bay Delaware river doctrine domicil doubt Duke of York England equity estoppel evidence fact give grant GRIER intention island January Jersey shore Judge judgment jurisdiction jury kumshaw land libel lien Lord Baltimore low water mark matter ment navigation October owner party passengers patent Pea Patch Pea Patch island Penn's Pennsylvania person Philadelphia plaintiff possession principle proprietaries province Province of Pennsylvania publick question replevin residence river Delaware says seizin settled settlement shew ship side STATEMENT statute suit Supreme Court testimony tion trial twelve miles twelve miles circle United verdict vessel William Penn witness writ
Popular passages
Page 160 - The promise thus made was a promise " to answer for the payment of some debt, or the performance of some duty, in case of the failure of another person who is himself, in the first instance, liable to such payment or performance.
Page 10 - ... in the presence of the said courts, or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice, the misbehavior of any of the officers of the said courts...
Page 84 - It Is certainly a maxim that all evidence is to be weighed according to the proof which it was in the power of one side to have produced, and in the power of the other to have contradicted.
Page cxviii - River, and hath upon the west Delaware Bay or river, and extendeth southward to the main ocean as far as Cape May, at the mouth of Delaware *Bay, and to the northward as far as the...
Page 254 - The third rule I shall extract is, that the original domicil, or, as it is called, the forum originis, or the domicil of origin, is to prevail until the party has not only acquired another, but has manifested and carried into execution an intention of abandoning his former domicil and taking another as his sole domicil.
Page 165 - That whenever, in any action for damages for making, using, or selling the thing whereof the exclusive right is secured by any patent heretofore granted, or by any patent which may hereafter be granted, a verdict shall be rendered for the plaintiff in such action, it shall be in the power of the court to render judgment for any sum above the amount found by such verdict as the actual damages sustained by the plaintiff, not exceeding three times the amount thereof, according to the circumstances of...
Page 340 - ... and such damages may be recovered by action on the case, in any court of competent jurisdiction, to be brought in the name or names of the person or persons interested, whether as patentee, assignees, or as grantees of the exclusive right within and throughout a specified part of the United States.
Page 32 - ... to commend him to regard, yet, that the case was one in which some punishment was demanded ; that it was in the power of the court to inflict the penalty of an imprisonment for a term of three years, and a fine of $1,000, but, in view of all the circumstances, and especially as the prisoner had been already confined in gaol several months, that the court would make the punishment more lenient. The convict was then sentenced to undergo an imprisonment in the Eastern Penitentiary of Pennsylvania,...
Page 13 - ... for death is the last and farthest point of particular necessity, and the law imposeth it upon every subject, that he prefer the urgent service of his prince and country before the safety of his life...
Page 272 - The privilege which is asserted here is the privilege of the court, rather than of the defendant. It is founded in the necessities of the judicial administration, which would be often embarrassed, and sometimes interrupted, if the suitor might be vexed with process while attending upon the court for the protection of his rights, or the witness while attending to testify.