Page images
PDF
EPUB

TABLE OF CASES REPORTED.

Anonymous......

........... Archer's Executors, United States v. ................ 173

Barnum, Wilson v. ............................... 342

id. id. v. ............................ Bayard, Lombard y. .. .......................... 196 Blanchard v. Brown. Ho... .................... 309 Blanchard v. Eldridge. ....... Bond v. The Superb, ...........

................... 355 Brown. Blanchard v. ............................ 309 Brown, White v. ......

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

W

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

........

...................

12

Canal Boat Benjamin, Lowe v. The ......
Carrigan v. The Charles Pitman,.......
Carter. Fisher v. ...............................

69

Charles Pitman, Carrigan v. The............. ...... 307 Childs v. Lenig, ............................... 805 Culvertson, Parker v.

Delaware & Raritan Canal, Rundle v. The ........

Edsall, Nones v. ................................ 189 Eldridge, Blanchard v. - ........................... 337

Fisher v. Carter,

345

Harding et al., United States v. ................
Havel. Low v...................

................ Holmes, United States v.

...... Hotchkiss, Parker v. ....... ....... ......... Hurst v. Jones, (Appendix.)......................

1

269

[blocks in formation]

:

La Veuve Dussert v. Roe, ........................ 39 Lenig, Childs v. ...........

.......... 305 Lerch, Miller v. ... Lombard v. Bayard Low v. Hauel,.................... ............... 345 Lowe v. The Canal Boat Benjamin, ...............

:

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

...............

Parker v. Hotchkiss,

...... 269 Parker v. Kempton, ...............

..... 344 Pea Patch Island, (Appendix.) ........................... Phillips' Executors, Wilcocks v. .....

... 164

Rail Roads, Stimpson v. The
Rail Roads, Wilton v. The ...

...... 192 Robert Morris, The .............

... 33 Robinson et al., United States v. ..................... Royal Saxon, Taylor v. The ......

..... 311 Roe, La Veuve Dussert v.

....... 39 Rundle v. The Delaware & Raritan Canal, ..............

161

[blocks in formation]

..........

307

.....

[ocr errors]

Taylor v. The Royal Saxon ......

.... 311 The Canal Boat Benjamin, Lowe v. .................. 187 The Charles Pitman, Carrigan v. ...................... The Delaware & Raritan Canal, Rundle v. .... 275 The Pea Patch Island, (Appendix.)....

ix The Rail Roads, Stimpson v.

.....
The Rail Roads, Wilton v.
The Robert Morris ...
The Royal Saxon, Taylor v. ...

.... 311

....

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

...........

United States v. Archer's Executors,

......... 173 id. v. Harding et al. ....................... ........ 127 id. v. Holmes, ....

..... 1 id. v. Robinson et al...........

161

343

................

..........

217

Weaver v. The S. G. Owens,.........

· 359 Weaver v. Thomson, White v. Brown, ......... Wilcocks v. Phillips' Executors, ..................... Wilson v. Barnum, .......

34:2 id. v. id.

.................

....... 347 Wilton v. The Rail Roads,

..............

...... 192

47

..........

RUL E S

AT LAW AND IN EQUITY OF THE

CIRCUIT AND DISTRICT COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES,

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT,

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

1. ADMISSIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVIDENCE. 1. In actions upon any instrument of writing, a copy of which shall have been filed within two weeks from the return day to which the action is brought, it shall not be necessary for the plaintiff, unless the defendant be an executor or administrator, to prove on the trial the execution thereof, nor in the case of bills of exchange or promissory notes, for an indorser to prove the signatures of prior endorsers, but the same shall be taken to be admitted, unless the defendant by affidavit filed at or before the time of filing his plea, shall have denied that such instrument of writing was executed by him, or that such endorsements were made.

2. In all actions by or against partners, it shall not be necessary for the plaintiff on the trial, to prove the partnership, but the same shall be taken to be admitted as alleged on the record, unless one or more of the defendants shall at or before the time of filing their plea, make and file an affidavit denying the existence of the partnership as alleged, and stating to the best of his or their knowledge and belief, whether there is any partnership in relation to the subject matter of the action, and if so, who are parties to it.

nece

« PreviousContinue »