Department of Defense Appropriations for 1979: Budget overviewU.S. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations, United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Department of Defense U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 3
... ESTIMATES FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee : It is a pleasure to appear before this Committee to discuss the FY 1979 Defense budget estimates . I have a prepared statement , including several charts and ...
... ESTIMATES FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee : It is a pleasure to appear before this Committee to discuss the FY 1979 Defense budget estimates . I have a prepared statement , including several charts and ...
Page 4
... estimated at $ 116,061 million . Contingent items amount to $ 2,305 million in budget authority and $ 2,288 million ... estimates to authorization and other legislative action , and also provides a breakdown of the contingent amount ...
... estimated at $ 116,061 million . Contingent items amount to $ 2,305 million in budget authority and $ 2,288 million ... estimates to authorization and other legislative action , and also provides a breakdown of the contingent amount ...
Page 10
... estimates -- nearly 3 % per year -- is needed to proceed with essential modernization and the enhancement of readiness . CHART TWENTY - ONE Included in our FY 1979 budget totals ( as contingent items -- not in the estimates submitted to ...
... estimates -- nearly 3 % per year -- is needed to proceed with essential modernization and the enhancement of readiness . CHART TWENTY - ONE Included in our FY 1979 budget totals ( as contingent items -- not in the estimates submitted to ...
Page 13
... estimates ? As the chart shows , last January we estimated that unobligated balances would be $ 16.3 billion at September 30 , 1977 ; they turned out to be $ 19 billion . We were off -- our estimate was low by $ 2.7 billion . -- Most of ...
... estimates ? As the chart shows , last January we estimated that unobligated balances would be $ 16.3 billion at September 30 , 1977 ; they turned out to be $ 19 billion . We were off -- our estimate was low by $ 2.7 billion . -- Most of ...
Page 14
... estimated at $ 5.3 billion at 9/30/79 . Balances are thus up 46 % . On that rough basis , balances have risen less than ... estimate . These balances were $ 2.2 billion higher than we had projected . As the chart shows , these variances ...
... estimated at $ 5.3 billion at 9/30/79 . Balances are thus up 46 % . On that rough basis , balances have risen less than ... estimate . These balances were $ 2.2 billion higher than we had projected . As the chart shows , these variances ...
Common terms and phrases
active additional air defense aircraft airlift allies appropriate arms Army attack AWACS ballistic missile billion bomber capability carrier CHAPPELL Chart combat Congress continue conventional cost cruise missile DEFENSE BUDGET Department of Defense deployed deployment deterrence dollars effective efforts equipment estimate Europe fleet funds FY 1979 budget helicopter ICBM improve increase initial launchers maintain major Marine Corps ment military MINUTEMAN MINUTEMAN III MIRVed mission mobility modernization NATO naval Navy nuclear forces nuclear weapons operational outlays percent personnel procurement projected proposed QUESTION radar readiness reduce request reserve SALT II Secretary BROWN Secretary of Defense ships SIKES SLBM Soviet Union squadrons strategic forces strategic nuclear submarine tanks targets theater nuclear theater nuclear forces threat tion TRIDENT United unobligated balances USSR V/STOL WACKER warfare warheads Warsaw Pact weapon systems
Popular passages
Page 372 - All requests to purchase major defense equipment are reviewed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Page 156 - The convention protects our environment by prohibiting all significant hostile uses of environmental modification techniques "having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as a means of destruction, damage or Injury to any other State Party.
Page 373 - I am initiating this policy of restraint in the full understanding that actual reductions in the worldwide traffic in arms will require multilateral cooperation.
Page 371 - The United States will not be the first supplier to introduce into a region newly-developed, advanced weapons systems which would create a new or significantly higher combat capability.
Page 18 - International affairs General science, space and technology Energy Natural resources and environment Agriculture Commerce and housing credit Transportation Community and regional development Education, training, employment, and social services Health Medicare Income security Social security Veterans...
Page 371 - We will continue to utilize arms transfers to promote our security and the security of our close friends. But in the future the burden of persuasion will be on those who favor a particular arms sale, rather than those who oppose it.
Page 131 - US advantages in other characteristics; and —— the US posture is not in fact, and is not seen as, inferior in performance to the strategic nuclear forces of the Soviet Union.
Page 731 - FULL-TIME TRAINING AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE SELECTED RESERVE Question. The Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs conducted a detailed study of the full-time training and administration of the selected reserve, and issued a draft report generally supporting the status of Full-Time Training and Administration of the Selected Reserve despite considerable differences in the systems used by the various Reserve components. Have you approved the final report and when will...
Page 371 - States will not entertain such requests, we can avoid unnecessary bilateral friction caused by later denials. 6. An amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations will be issued, requiring policy level authorization by the Department of State for actions by agents of the United States or private manufacturers which might promote the sale of arms abroad.
Page 203 - In designing our general purpose forces, what must concern us first and foremost is the heavy concentration of Soviet forces in Eastern Europe and the western military districts of the USSR. Those forces represent a direct and growing threat to the security of Western Europe, on both the central front and the flanks. They also define the magnitude of the largest and most serious non-nuclear contingency that could confront us in the foreseeable future. To stress Europe is not to rule out...