« PreviousContinue »
instead of preserving them, and so to prevent the event decreed and predicted. Though God decreed, that Hazael should kill the king his master; yet he had natural power to refrain from that traitorous deed, and so to prevent the evil, which God had determined and declared should exist. Though God decreed, that Judas should betray Christ; yet he had natural power to refrain from that action, to which he was bribed by the Jews and tempted by Satan, and so to counteract the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God. In these instances, there can be no doubt but that those, who fulfilled, had natural power to frustrate the divine purposes, which depended upon their agency. And now to make it appear, that this is true in all cases,
I would observe,
1. That when God decrees, that any event shall be brought about, by the instrumentality of men, he always decrees, that they shail have natural power to fulfil bis decree. This must be extremely plain to every one; for we cannot suppose, that God should decree, that any event should be brought about, by human agents incapable of bringing it about. But no man is capable of doing that which he has not natural power to do. When God decreed, that Hazael should destroy his royal master, he decreed, that Hazael should have both health and strength, to perform the traitorons deed, for had he been deprived of these, he could not have fulfilled the divine decree. This holds in all eases, in which a decreed event depends upon the instrumentality of men. The decree of God is so far from taking away the natural power of those, who are appointed to execute it, that it always secures that power. The decree which made it certain that Judas should betray Christ, made it equally certain, that he should have natural power to perpetrate that crime; so that it was certain, that he should neither take away his own life,
, nor have it taken away, before he had actually betrayed his Master. For God to decree, that men should be instrumentalin bringing some particular event to pass; and yet not decree to give them natural power to do what was necessary on their part to do, would be the same, as to decree that that event should not take place. It must, therefore, be admitted, that men always have natural power to do whatever God has decreed they shall do. But,
2. When men have natural power to do any thing, they always have natural power to neglect it. Nothing can be plainer, than that those who have a natural power to act, have the same natural power to refrain from acting. The seamen and master of the ship, who had natural power to set sail, had the same natural power to desist from that rash conduct, according to the good advice of Paul. The soldiers, who had natural power to guard the prisoners, had the same natural power to neglect their duty, and let them escape. So that it always holds true, that when God gives men natural power to fulfil bis decrees, they have the same natural power to neglect to fulfil them. Hence,
3. Men always have natural power to frustrate those divine decrees, which they are appointed to fulfil. God decreed, that Paul and his company should get safe to land, by the instrumentality of the sailors; but they had natural power to frustrate that decree. So Paul told the centurion and the soldiers, “Except these abide in the ship ye cannot be saved." The sailors were about to leave the ship, and to neglect affording the company that assistance which was decreed, and which was absolutely necessary to preserve the lives of the passengers. This they had natural
power to neglect, and had they neglected it, they would have frustrated the divine decree. As it is always true, that men have natural power to fulfil any decree, which they are appointed to fulfil; so it is equally true, that they always have the same natural power to prevent the fulfilment of it. Their not acting, in every such case, would as effectually frustrate the purpose of God, as their acting would fulfil hig purpose. And since he always gives men natural power to fulfil his decrees, they always have the same natural power to defeat them. This all those are conscious of, who attempt to frustrate his designs. Joseph's brethren thought they had natural power to defeat the divine purpose. Ahab, when he went to Ramoth-Gilead, had the same opinion. The soldiers supposed they had natural power to kill Paul, as they proposed, to prevent his escape. And all men are conscious that they have natural power to neglect whatever they have natural power to do. It hence follows, that men have, and know they have natural power to frustrate those decrees of God, whose accomplishment depends upon their agency. .
IMPROVEMENT. 1. Since men always fulfil those decrees of God, which they have natural power to frustrate, we must suppose, that he always makes them willing to act agreeably to his decrees. Two things are absolutely necessary in order to men's acting; one is to be able, and the other is to be willing. By being able is meant a natural power to act, and by being willing a moral power to act. Whatever God determines men shall do, he not only gives them a natural, but moral power to do: and when he gives them both a natural and moral power to do any thing, they are under a moral necessity of doing it. Hence there is always both a natural possibility, and a moral impossibility, of their defeating the divine purposes. In one sense it is always true, that men can defeat the designs of God; and in another sense it is always equally true, that they cannot defeat his designs. This distinction between natural and moral power, natural and moral necessity, and natural and moral impossibility, is agreeable to common sense, and to the whole tenor of Scripture; and fully accounts for men's always fulfilling those purposes of God, which they have natural power to frus, trate. Though God knows, that mankind have natųral power to act contrary to his designs; yet he knows, that he is able to make them willing to fulfil his purposes, and that he has determined to make them willing; and hence he knows, that they always will fulfil his purposes, by voluntarily performing those actions, which he has determined they shall perform. God has the hearts of all men in his hand, and can turn them whithersoever he pleases, as the rivers of water are turned. And it is by operating upon their hearts, that he makes them the voluntary instruments of fulfilling those purposes of his, which they have natural power to coun, teract and defeat.
2. If men always have natural power to frustrate as well as fulfil the decrees of God; then they always act freely in fulfilling his decrees. If they were willing as well as able to defeat his purposes, they certainly would defeat them. Was there ever an instance known of a man's being both able and willing to do an action, and neglecting to do it? Or can we even conceive of a man's being both able and willing to do an action, and yet neglecting to do it? It is just as impossible to conceive of such a case of neglect, as to conceive of an effect without a cause. When a man is both able and willing to act, there is a sufficient cause for his acting; but no cause at all for his neglecting to act. Hence it is absolutely certain, that men always act freely, while they act agreeably to the divine purposes, which they are able to frustrate, bea cause no reason can be given, why they act agreeably to those divine purposes, but that they choose to act agreeably to them. If the decrees of God prevented men from acting voluntarily, they would indeed destroy their free agency; but since they are consistent with their acting voluntarily, they are entirely consistent with their moral freedom. Paul and all those who sailed with him in their voyage to Italy, acted agreeably to the decrees of God, yet they acted freely, because they acted voluntarily, in every instance of their conduct. Accordingly, when they arrived to land, Paul told them, that they ought to have hearkened to him, and that if they had hearkened to him, as they might have done notwithstanding the divine decree, they would have escaped the harm and loss, which they had unhappily sustained. This instance demonstrates, that the decrees of God respecting the conduct of men, are perfectly consistent with their free agency in fulfilling his decrees.
3. If men have natural power to frustrate as well as to fulfil the decrees of God; then the non-elect have as fair an opportunity of being saved as the elect. The decree of reprobation leaves them in the full possession of all their natural power to choose or refuse the offers of mercy. They have as much strength, and as fair an opportunity to embrace the gospel, as the elect have, before they embrace it. This may be clearly exemplified in the case of Judas, who was reprobated; and of Paul, who was elected. They were both, for a long time, in a state of impenitence and unbelief. Judas in that state was as able to embrace