...achievement of common aims. Restrictions upon the independence of States cannot therefore be presumed. Now the first and foremost restriction imposed by international...the existence of a permissive rule to the contrary — it may not exercise its power in any form in the territory of another State. In this sense jurisdiction...

...achievement of common aims. Restrictions upon the independence of States cannot therefore be presumed. Now the first and foremost restriction imposed by international...the existence of a permissive rule to the contrary — it may not exercise its power in any form in the territory of another State. In this sense jurisdiction...

...sovereignty." The view based on these two grounds was expressed in the following terms (p. 18, 19) : " Now the first and foremost restriction imposed by international...the existence of a permissive rule to the contrary — it may not exercise its power in any form in the territory of another State. In this sense jurisdiction...

...International Law, 1928, p. 867 sq. 2. 7 Cranch, 116. 3. Souveraineté et Liberté (Paris 1922), p. 80. "state is that, failing the existence of a permissive rule to the "contrary, it may not exercise its power in any form in the "territory of another state 1." This dictum quite...

...PCIJ in the Lotus case (1927): "Now the first and foremost restriction imposed by international law is that — failing the existence of a permissive rule to the contrary — it may not exercise its power in any form in the territory of another State. In this sense jurisdiction...

...the Supreme Court was concerned in The Appollon and the principle which the World Court recognizes as "the first and foremost restriction imposed by international law upon a state," The SS Lotus. PCIJ, Ser. A, No. 10, II Hudson, World Court Reports 20.**/ */ Paragraph 1 of Article...

...laws to other countries. As the Permanent Court of International Justice said as early as 1927: Now the first and foremost restriction imposed by international law upon a State is that — finding the existence of a permissive rule to the contrary — it may not exercise its power in...

...countries. As the Permanent Court of International Justice said as early as 1927: - .-rt•.-•' Now the first and foremost restriction imposed by international law upon a State is that — 430 finding the existence of a permissive rule to the contrary — it may not exercise its power...

...argument that such assertions contravene the traditional rule established in the Lotus"1 case that: "the first and foremost restriction imposed by international...the existence of a permissive rule to the contrary - it may not exercise its power in any form in the territory of another State.""2 Some such protests...

...jurisdiction, which includes foreigners.10 Nationalization is 8. Lotus Case PCIJ Series A no. 10 p. 18: "Now the first and foremost restriction imposed by international...the existence of a permissive rule to the contrary - it may not exercise its power in any form in the territory of another State. In this sense jurisdiction...