« PreviousContinue »
who are qualified to perform the job are included within the pool of persons from which the selecting official makes the selection;
(f) A systematic effort to provide career advancement training, both classroom and on-the-job, to employees locked into dead end jobs; and
(g) The establishment of a system for regularly monitoring the effectiveness of the particular affirmative action program, and procedures for making timely adjustments in this program where effectiveness is not demonstrated.
(4) The goal of any affirmative action plan should be achievement of genuine equal employment opportunity for all qualified persons. Selection under such plans should be based upon the ability of the applicant(s) to do the work. Such plans should not require the selection of the unqualified, or the unneeded, nor should they require the selection of persons on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, or national origin. Moreover, while the Council believes that this statement should serve to assist State and local employers, as well as Federal agencies, it recognizes that affirmative action cannot be viewed as a standardized program which must be accomplished in the same way at all times in all places.
Accordingly, the Council has not attempted to set forth here either the minimum or maximum voluntary steps that employers may take to deal with their respective situations. Rather, the Council recognizes that under applicable authorities, State and local employers have flexibility to formulate affirmative action plans that are best suited to their particular situations. In this manner, the Council believes that affirmative action programs will best serve the goal of equal employment opportunity. Respectfully submitted,
HAROLD R. TYLER, Jr., Deputy Attorney General and Chairman of the Equal Employment Coordinating Council.
MICHAEL H. MOSKOW, Under Secretary of Labor.
ETHEL BENT WALSH, Acting Chairman, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
ROBERT E. HAMPTON,
ARTHUR E. FLEMMING,
ecause of its equal employment opportunity responsibilities under the State and Local Government Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972 (the revenue sharing act), the Department of Treasury was invited to participate in the formulation of this policy statement; and it concurs and joins in the adoption of this policy statement. Done this 26th day of August 1976.
General Counsel, Department of the Treasury.
Section 18. Citations. The official title of these guidelines is "Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (1978)". The Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (1978) are intended to establish a uniform Federal position in the area of prohibiting discrimination in employment practices on grounds of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. These guidelines have been adopted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Department of Labor, the Department of Justice, and the Civil Service Commission.
The official citation is:
"Section Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedure (1978); 43 FR (August 25, 1978)."
The short form citation is:
"Section U.G.E.S.P. (1978); 43 FR (August 25, 1978)."
When the guidelines are cited in connection with the activities of one of the issuing agencies, a specific citation to the regulations of that agency can be added at the end of the above citation. The specific additional citations are as follows: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
29 CFR Part 1607 Department of Labor Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs
41 CFR Part 60-3 Department of Justice
28 CFR 50.14 Civil Service Commission
5 CFR 300.103(c)
Normally when citing these guidelines, the section number immediately preceding the title of the guidelines will be from these guidelines series 1–18. If a section number from the codification for an individual agency is needed it can also be added at the end of the agency citation. For example, section 6A of these guidelines could be cited for EEOC as follows: "Section 6A, Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (1978); 43 FR (August 25, 1978); 29 CFR part 1607, section 6A."
ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, Chair, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
ALAN K, CAMPBELL,
GRIFFIN B. BELL, Attorney General. (Order No. 668–76, 41 FR 51735, Nov. 23, 1976, as amended at 43 FR 38295, Aug. 25, 1978]
850.15 Representation of Federal offi- ten request and appropriate docu
cials and employees by Department mentation must be subsequently proof Justice attorneys or by private vided. counsel furnished by the Depart
(2) Upon receipt of the individual's ment in civil, criminal, and congres
request for counsel, the litigating divisional proceedings in which Federal employees are sued, subpoe
sion shall determine whether the emnaed, or charged in their individual ployee's actions reasonably appear to capacities.
have been performed within the scope
of his employment and whether pro(a) Under the procedures set forth below, a federal employee (hereby de
viding representation would be in the fined to include present and former
interest of the United States. In cirFederal officials and employees) may
cumstances where considerations of be provided representation in civil,
professional ethics prohibit direct recriminal and Congressional
view of the facts by attorneys of the
proceedings in which he is sued, subpoe
litigating division (e.g. because of the naed, or charged in his individual ca
possible existence of inter-defendant pacity, not covered by $15.1 of this
conflicts) the litigating division may chapter, when the actions for which
delegate the fact-finding aspects of this representation is requested reasonably
function to other components of the appear to have been performed within Department or to a private attorney at the scope of the employee's employ
federal expenses. ment and the Attorney General or his
(3) Attorneys employed by any comdesignee determines that providing ponent of the Department of Justice representation would otherwise be in who participate in any process utilized the interest of the United States. No
for the purpose of determining whether special form of request for representa- the Department should provide reption is required when it is clear from
resentation to a federal employee, unthe proceedings in a case that the em
dertake a full and traditional attorneyployee is being sued solely in his offi
client relationship with the employee cial capacity and only equitable relief with respect to application of the atis sought. (See USAM 4-13.000)
torney-client privilege. If representa(1) When an employee believes he is
tion is authorized, Justice Department entitled to representation by the De- attorneys who represent an employee partment of Justice in a proceeding, he under this section also undertake a full must submit forthwith a written re- and traditional attorney-client relaquest for that representation, together tionship with the employee with rewith all process and pleadings served spect to the attorney-client privilege. upon him, to his immediate supervisor Any adverse information commuor whomever is designated by the head nicated by the client-employee to an of his department or agency. Unless attorney during the course of such atthe employee's employing federal agen- torney-client relationship shall not be cy concludes that representation is disclosed to anyone, either inside or clearly unwarranted, it shall submit, in outside the Department, other than ata timely manner, to the Civil Division torneys responsible for representation or other appropriate litigating division of the employee, unless such disclosure (Antitrust, Civil Rights, Criminal, is authorized by the employee. Such Land and Natural Resources or the Tax adverse information shall continue to Division), a statement containing its be fully protected whether or not repfindings as to whether the employee resentation is provided, and was acting within the scope of his em- though representation may be denied ployment and its recommendation for or discontinued. The extent, if any, to or against providing representation. which attorneys employed by an agenThe statement should be accompanied cy other than the Department of Jusby all available factual information. In tice undertake a full and traditional emergency situations the litigating di- attorney-client relationship with the vision may initiate conditional rep- employee with respect to the attorneyresentation after a telephone request client privilege, either for purposes of from the appropriate official of the em- determining whether representation ploying agency. In such cases, the writ- should be provided or to assist Justice
Department attorneys in representing the employee, shall be determined by the agency employing the attorneys.
(4) Representation generally is not available in federal
criminal proceedings. Representation may be provided to a federal employee in connection with a federal criminal proceeding only where the Attorney General or his designee determines that representation is in the interest of the United States and subject to applicable limitations of $50.16. In determining whether representation in a federal criminal proceeding is in the interest of the United States, the Attorney General or his designee shall consider, among other factors, the relevance of any nonprosecutorial interests of the United States, the importance of the interests implicated, the Department's ability to protect those interests through other means, and the likelihood of a conflict of interest between the Department's prosecutorial and representational responsibilities. If representation is authorized, the Attorney General or his designee also may determine whether representation by Department attorneys, retention of private counsel at federal expense, or reimbursement to the employee of private counsel fees is most appropriate under the circumstances.
(5) Where representation is sought for proceedings other than federal criminal proceedings, but there appears to exist the possibility of a federal criminal investigation or indictment relating to the same subject matter, the litigating division shall contact a designated official in the Criminal, Civil Rights or Tax Division or other prosecutive authority within the Department (hereinafter “prosecuting division") to determine whether the employee is either a subject of a federal criminal investigation or a defendant in a federal criminal case. An employee is the subject of an investigation if, in addition to being circumstantially implicated by having the appropriate responsibilities at the appropriate time, there is some evidence of his specific participation in a crime.
(6) If a prosecuting division of the Department indicates that the employee is not the subject of a criminal investigation concerning the act or acts for
which he seeks representation, then representation may be provided if otherwise permissible under the provisions of this section. Similarly, if the prosecuting division indicates that there is an ongoing investigation, but into a matter unrelated to that for which representation has been requested, then representation may be provided.
(7) If the prosecuting division indicates that the employee is the subject of a federal criminal investigation concerning the act or acts for which he seeks representation, the litigating division shall inform the employee that no representation by Justice Department attorneys will be provided in that federal criminal proceeding or in any related civil, congressional, or state criminal proceeding. In such a case, however, the litigating division, in its discretion, may provide a private attorney to the employee at federal expense under the procedures of $50.16, or provide reimbursement to employees for private attorney fees incurred in connection with such related civil, congressional, state criminal
proceeding, provided no decision has been made to seek an indictment or file an information against the employee.
(8) In any case where it is determined that Department of Justice attorneys will represent a federal employee, the employee must be notified of his right to retain private counsel at his own expense. If he elects representation by Department of Justice attorneys, the employee and his agency shall be promptly informed:
(i) That in actions where the United States, any agency, or any officer thereof in his official capacity is also named as a defendant, the Department of Justice is required by law to represent the United States and/or such agency or officer and will assert all appropriate legal positions and defenses on behalf of such agency, officer and/or the United States;
(ii) That the Department of Justice will not assert any legal position or defense on behalf of any employee sued in his individual capacity which is deemed not to be in the interest of the United States;
(iii) Where appropriate, that neither the Department of Justice nor any agency of the U.S. Government is obligated to pay or to indemnify the defendant employee for any judgment for money damages which may be rendered against such employee; but that, where authorized, the employee may apply for such indemnification from his employing agency upon the entry of an adverse verdict, judgment, or other monetary award;
(iv) That any appeal by Department of Justice attorneys from an adverse ruling or judgment against the employee may only be taken upon the discretionary approval of the Solicitor General, but the employee-defendant may pursue an appeal at his own expense whenever the Solicitor General declines to authorize an appeal and private counsel is not provided at federal expense under the procedures of $50.16; and
(v) That while no conflict appears to exist at the time representation is tendered which would preclude making all arguments necessary to the adequate defense of the employee, if such conflict should arise in the future the employee will be promptly advised and steps will be taken to resolve the conflict as indicated by paragraph (a) (6), (9) and (10) of this section, and by $50.16.
(9) If a determination not to provide representation is made, the litigating division shall inform the agency and/or the employee of the determination.
(10) If conflicts exist between the legal and factual positions of various employees in the same
which make it inappropriate for a single attorney to represent them all, the employees may be separated into as many compatible groups as is necessary to resolve the conflict problem and each group may be provided with separate representation. Circumstances may make it advisable that private representation be provided to all conflicting groups and that direct Justice Department representation be withheld so as not to prejudice particular defendants. In such situations, the procedures of $ 50.16 will apply.
(11) Whenever the Solicitor General declines to authorize further appellate review or the Department attorney assigned to represent an employee becomes aware that the representation of
the employee could involve the assertion of a position that conflicts with the interests of the United States, the attorney shall fully advise the employee of the decision not to appeal or the nature, extent, and potential consequences of the conflict. The attorney shall also determine, after consultation with his supervisor (and, if appropriate, with the litigating division) whether the assertion of the position or appellate review is necessary to the adequate representation of the employee and
(i) If it is determined that the assertion of the position or appeal is not necessary to the adequate representation of the employee, and if the employee knowingly agrees to forego appeal or to waive the assertion of that position, governmental representation may be provided or continued; or
(ii) If the employee does not consent to forego appeal or waive the assertion of the position, or if it is determined that an appeal or assertion of the position is necessary to the adequate representation of the employee, a Justice Department lawyer may not provide or continue to provide the representation; and (iii) In appropriate
arising under paragraph (a)(10)(ii) of this section, a private attorney may be provided at federal expense under the procedures of $ 50.16.
(12) Once undertaken, representation of a federal employee under this subsection will continue until either all appropriate proceedings, including applicable appellate procedures approved by the Solicitor General, have ended, or until any of the bases for declining or withdrawing from representation set forth in this section is found to exist, including without limitation the basis that representation is not in the interest of the United States. If representation is discontinued for any reason, the representing Department attorney on the case will seek to withdraw but will take all reasonable steps to avoid prejudice to the employee.
(b) Representation is not available to a federal employee whenever:
(1) The conduct with regard to which the employee desires representation does not reasonably appear to have been performed within the scope of his
ommendation to the Attorney General for decision.
(5) Any payment under this section either to indemnify a Department of Justice employee or to settle a personal damages claim shall be contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds of the employing component of the Department of Justice. [Order No. 970–82, 47 FR 8172, Feb. 25, 1982, as amended at Order No. 1139–86, 51 FR 27022, July 29, 1986; Order No. 1409–90, 55 FR 13130, Apr. 9, 1990)
employment with the federal government;
(2) It is otherwise determined by the Department that it is not in the interest of the United States to provide representation to the employee.
(C)(1) The Department of Justice may indemnify the defendant Department of Justice employee for any verdict, judgment, or other monetary award which is rendered against such employee, provided that the conduct giving rise to the verdict, judgment, or award was taken within the scope of employment and that such indemnification is in the interest of the United States, as determined by the Attorney General or his designee.
(2) The Department of Justice may settle or compromise a personal damages claim against a Department of Justice employee by the payment of available funds, at any time, provided the alleged conduct giving rise to the personal damages claim was taken within the scope of employment and that such settlement or compromise is in the interest of the United States, as determined by the Attorney General or his designee.
(3) Absent exceptional circumstances as determined by the Attorney General or his designee, the Department will not entertain a request either to agree to indemnify or to settle a personal damages claim before entry of an adverse verdict, judgment, or award.
(4) The Department of Justice employee may request indemnification to satisfy a verdict, judgment, or award entered against the employee. The employee shall submit a written request, with appropriate documentation including copies of the verdict, judgment, award, or settlement proposal if on appeal, to the head of his employing component, who shall thereupon submit to the appropriate Assistant Attorney General, in a timely manner, a recommended disposition of the request. Where appropriate, the Assistant Attorney General shall seek the views of the U.S. Attorney; in all such cases the Civil Division shall be consulted. The Assistant Attorney General shall forward the request, the employing component's recommendation, and the Assistant Attorney General's rec
8 50.16 Representation of Federal em
ployees by private counsel at Fed
eral expense. (a) Representation by private counsel at federal expense or reimbursement of private counsel fees is subject to the availability of funds and may be provided to a federal employee only in the instances described in $50.15(a) (4), (7), (10), and (11), and in appropriate circumstances, for the purposes set forth in $50.15(a)(2).
(b) To ensure uniformity in retention and reimbursement procedures among the litigating divisions, the Civil Division shall be responsible for establishing procedures for the retention of private counsel and the reimbursement to an employee of private counsel fees, including the setting of fee schedules. In all instances where a litigating division decides to retain private counsel or to provide reimbursement of private counsel fees under this section, the Civil Division shall be consulted before the retention or reimbursement is undertaken.
(c) Where private counsel is provided, the following procedures shall apply:
(1) While the Department of Justice will generally defer to the employee's choice of counsel, the Department must approve in advance any private counsel to be retained under this section. Where national security interests may be involved, the Department of Justice will consult with the agency employing the federal defendant seeking representation.
(2) Federal payments to private counsel for an employee will cease if the private counsel violates any of the terms of the retention agreement or the Department of Justice.