« PreviousContinue »
their wits and their writings; and if they are plundered of the latter, I don't see what good the former can do them. To pirate, and publickly own it, to prefix their names to the works they steal, to own and avow the theft, I believe, was never yet heard of but in England. It will sound oddly to posterity, that, in a polite nation, in an enlightened age, under the direction of the most wise, moft learned, and most generous encouragers of knowledge in the world, the property of a mechanick should be better secured than that of a scholar; that the poorest manual operations should be more valued than the noblest
products of the brain ; that it should be felony to rob a cobler of a pair of shoes, and no crime to deprive the best author of his whole fübfistence; that nothing should make a man a sure title to his own writings but the stupidity of them; that the works of Dryden should meet with less encouragement than those of his own, Flecknoe, or Blackmore ; that Tillotson and St. George, Tom Thumb and. Temple, should be set on an equal foot. This is the reason why this very Paper has been so long delayed; and while the most impudent and scandalous libels are publickly
vended by the pirates, this innocent work; js. forced to steal abroad as if it were a libela
Our present writers are by these wretches reduced to the same condition Virgil was, when the centurion seized on his estate. But I don't doubt but I can fix upon
the Mæcenas of the present age, that will retrieve them from it. But, whatever effect this piracy may have upon us, it contributed very much to. the advantage of Mr. Philips ; it helped him to a reputation, which he neither defired nor expected, and to the honour of being put upon a work of which he did not think him-. self capable; but the event shewed his modefty. And it was reasonable to hope, that he, who could raise mean subjects so high, should still be more elevated on greater themes; that he, that could draw such noble ideas from a shilling, could not fail upon such a subject as the duke of Marlborough, which is capable of heightening even the most low and trifling genius. And, indeed, most of the great works which have been produced . in the world have been owing less to the poet than the patron. - Men of the greatest genius are sometimes lazy, and want a fpur; often
modest, and dare not venture in publick: they certainly know their faults in the worst*. things ; and even their best things they are not fond of, because the idea of what they ought to be is far above what they are. This. induced me to believe that Virgil defired his. work might be burnt, had not the same Aus.. gustus, that desired him to write them, preserved them from destruction. A scribbling beau may imagine a Poet may be induced to write, by the very pleasure he finds in writ? ing; but that is feldom, when people are; necessitated to it. I have known men row, and use very hard labour, for diversion, which if they had been tied to, they would have thought themselves
But to return to Blenheim, that work fo much admired by fome, and censured by others. I have often wished he had wrote it in Latin, that he might be out of the reach: of the empty criticks, who could have as little understood his meaning in that language as they do his beauties in his own.
False criticks have been the plague of all ages ; Milton himself, in a very polite court,
has been compared to the rumbling of a wheel-barrow : he had been on the wrong side, and therefore could not be a good poet. And this, perhaps, may be Mr. Philips's cafe.
But I take generally the ignorance of his readers to be the occasion of their dislike. People that have formed their taste upon the French writers can have no relish for Philips : they admire points and turns, and consequently have no judgement of what is
great and majestick : he must look little in their eyes, when he foars so high as to be almost out of their view. I cannot therefore allow any admirer of the French to be a judge of Blenheim, nor any who takes Bouhours for a compleat critick. He generally judges of the ancients by the moderns, and not the moderns by the ancients; he takes those palsages of their own authors to be really sublime which come the nearest to it; he often calls that a noble and a great thought which is only a pretty and fine one, and has more instances of the sublime out of Ovid de Tri. Itibus, than he has out of all Virgil.
I shall allow, therefore, only those to be judges of Philips, who make the ancients, and particularly Virgil, their standard.
But before I enter on this subject, I shall consider what is particular in the style of Philips, and examine what ought to be the style of heroick poetry; and next inquire how far he is come up to that style.
His style is particular, because he lays aside rhyme, and writes in blank verse, and uses old words, and frequently postpones the ad. jective to the substantive, and the substantive to the verb; and leaves out little particles, a, and the; her, and his ; and uses frequent appositions. Now let us examine, whether these alterations of style be conformable to the true sublime,