Defense Procurement Conflict of Interest Act: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Administrative Law and Governmental Relations of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 2554 ... January 29, 30, 1986, Volume 4 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 22
Page 39
... continuing influence upon their former colleagues . Thus , if the subcommittee concludes that the failure of 18 U.S.C. 207 to address the concern relating to selfish use of confidences and secrets of the Government by former employees ...
... continuing influence upon their former colleagues . Thus , if the subcommittee concludes that the failure of 18 U.S.C. 207 to address the concern relating to selfish use of confidences and secrets of the Government by former employees ...
Page 42
... continuing personal influence over his or her former associ- ates . These early policy considerations , and others similar to them , provided the impetus for the enactment of the major revi- sion to Federal bribery and conflicts - of ...
... continuing personal influence over his or her former associ- ates . These early policy considerations , and others similar to them , provided the impetus for the enactment of the major revi- sion to Federal bribery and conflicts - of ...
Page 52
... continuing personal influence on their former colleagues . Thus , should the Subcommittee decide that the failure of 18 U.S.C. 207 to address the concern relating to selfish use of the confidences and secrets of the government by former ...
... continuing personal influence on their former colleagues . Thus , should the Subcommittee decide that the failure of 18 U.S.C. 207 to address the concern relating to selfish use of the confidences and secrets of the government by former ...
Page 53
... continuing influence over former colleagues , H.R. 2554 might provide addi- tional protection in that regard . In addition , H.R. 2554 would reduce the risk that Department of Defense officials will make decisions which might not be in ...
... continuing influence over former colleagues , H.R. 2554 might provide addi- tional protection in that regard . In addition , H.R. 2554 would reduce the risk that Department of Defense officials will make decisions which might not be in ...
Page 54
... continuing influence on their former colleagues , and would reduce the risk that DOD officials will make decisions with a view towards future employment with a defense contractor in mind . Mr. GLICKMAN . So that I understand it , what 54.
... continuing influence on their former colleagues , and would reduce the risk that DOD officials will make decisions with a view towards future employment with a defense contractor in mind . Mr. GLICKMAN . So that I understand it , what 54.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrative agency ethics official Air Force amended apply Attorney audit Authorization Act BENNETT bill Chairman Committee compensation conflict of interest Congress contract Counsel criminal Dan Glickman David Packard defense contractor Defense Procurement Conflict Department of Defense Department of Justice Director employment enforcement Ethics in Government Ethics Newsgram ethics program executive branch financial disclosure reports financial interest GLICKMAN going Government Act government employees Government Ethics government service individual Interest Act issue KEENEY legislation MARTIN matters involving MCBRIDE negotiating Office of Government officers and employees particular matter penalties Pentagon percent personnel ployee position post-employment Presidential appointee procurement function prohibits prosecution Public Integrity Section referrals regulations reporting requirement revolving door Schedule Secretary of Defense section 208 matter significant responsibilities specific staff standards of conduct statement statute Subcommittee tion United United States Attorneys United States Code VANDER SCHAAF WITT
Popular passages
Page 140 - ... particular matter in which, to his knowledge, he, his spouse, minor child, partner, organization in which he is serving as officer, director, trustee, partner or employee, or any person or organization with whom he is negotiating or has any arrangement concerning prospective employment, has a financial interest — Shall be fined not more than $10,000, or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
Page 109 - An employee shall avoid any action, whether or not specifically prohibited by this subpart, which might result in, or create the appearance of: (1) Using public office for private gain; (2) Giving preferential treatment to any person; (3) Impeding Government efficiency or economy; (4) Losing complete Independence or impartiality; (5) Making a Government decision outside official channels; or (6) Affecting adversely the confidence of the public in the integrity of the Government.
Page 45 - States in connection with any judicial or other proceeding, application, request for a ruling or other determination, contract, claim, controversy, charge, accusation, arrest, or other particular matter involving a specific party...
Page 45 - ... particular matter involving a specific party or parties in which the United States is a party or has a direct and substantial interest and in which he participated personally and substantially as an officer or employee, through decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, the rendering of advice, investigation, or otherwise...
Page 48 - ... be punished by a fine of not more than $5,000 or imprisonment for not more than twelve months, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
Page 46 - ... charge, accusation, arrest, or other particular matter involving a specific party or parties in which the United States or the District of Columbia is a party or has a direct and substantial interest and...
Page 110 - ... (2) giving preferential treatment to any organization or person; (3) Impeding government efficiency or economy; (4) losing complete independence or impartiality of action; (5) making a government decision outside official channels; or (6) affecting adversely the confidence of the public In the integrity of the Government.
Page 42 - The proper operation of a democratic government requires that officials be independent and impartial ; that government decisions and policy be made in the proper channels of the governmental structure; that public office not be used for personal gain ; and that the public have confidence in the integrity of its government.
Page 45 - Disqualification of former officers and employees in matters connected with former duties or official responsibilities; disqualification of partners (a) Whoever, having been an officer or employee of the executive branch of the United States Government, of any independent agency of the United States, or of the District of Columbia, including a special Government employee, after his employment has ceased, knowingly acts as agent or attorney for anyone other than the United States in connection with...
Page 78 - STATEMENT BY DEREK J. VANDER SCHAAF DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND GOVERNMENT RELATIONS OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY JANUARY 29, 1986 78 SUMMARY HR 2554, the "Defense Procurement Conflict of Interest Act," deals with the phenomenon commonly referred to as the "revolving door.