 no man can justify selling corrupt victual, but an action on the case lies against the seller, whether the victual was warranted to be good or not.  Tutt and Mr. Tutt - Page 189by Arthur Train - 1920 - 304 pagesFull view - About this book
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - Law reports, digests, etc - 1849 - 944 pages
...necessity of preventing injury to the public. In Keilway's Rep. 91, (22 Hen. 7) (a), Frowickc said, that " no man can justify selling corrupt victual, but an...whether the victual was warranted to be good or not. But if a man sells me cloth or other thing, knowing the cloth to be bad, there I am deceived ' per... | |
 | Edwin Tyrrell Hurlstone, John Paxton Norman - Law reports, digests, etc - 1862 - 1112 pages
...did not know that it was unwholesome.] In Keilwey's Rep. 91 (22 Hen. 7), Frowike 1862. said " that no man can justify selling corrupt victual, but an...case lies against the seller, whether the victual »• MATHEWB. was warranted to be good or not. But if a man sells me cloth or other thing, knowing... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - Law reports, digests, etc - 1919 - 1132 pages
...(Cited and followed in Wallis v. Russell, 2 Irish Rep. [1902] 611.) And Keilway (22 Henry VII, 91) said: " No man can justify selling corrupt victual,...whether the victual was warranted to be good or not." This reasoning would seem to be without application to modern conditions, where any person, whether... | |
| |
