Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances: Opinions and Decisions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission with Selected Orders, Volume 7United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1978 - Nuclear energy |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident alternative sites amended analysis antitrust Appeal Board Appendix Applicant's assurance Atomic Energy Act ATOMIC SAFETY basis Board finds CFR Part 50 Commission's concluded consideration considered construction permit cooling towers determined Docket dose effects Electric electrical connectors environmental impact estimate evaluation evidence facility filed financial qualifications following Tr fuel cycle health and safety hearing intervene intervenors issuance issue Jamesport Licensing Board Marble Hill matter ment motion NEPA NRC Staff Nuclear Plant nuclear power plant Nuclear Regulatory Commission operating license Partial Initial Decision parties petition petitioner Power Company proceeding proposed findings PSAR pursuant question radioactive radon reactor reasonable record regulations remand request result RULES OF PRACTICE SAFETY AND LICENSING Seabrook Section Shearon Harris southern New England spent fuel Staff Ex Station Supplemental Testimony supra Tarapur tion Units utility Vermont Yankee WPPSS
Popular passages
Page 44 - Safeguards for a report and without a prior public hearing, upon finding that there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered.
Page 219 - It is the national policy that to the maximum extent possible the procedures utilized for implementing this Act shall encourage the drastic minimization of paperwork and interagency decision procedures, and the best use of available manpower and funds, so as to prevent needless duplication and unnecessary delays at all levels of government.
Page 650 - The applicable rule is that where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not.
Page 664 - Hence it is a guiding principle, in determining whether a court should exercise or surrender its jurisdiction in such cases, that the courts should not so act as to embarrass the executive arm in its conduct of foreign affairs. ' In such cases the judicial department of this government follows the action of the political branch and will not embarrass the latter by assuming an antagonistic jurisdiction.
Page 270 - ... more stringent than necessary to assure the protection and propagation of a balanced, indigenous population of shellfish, fish, and wildlife...
Page 428 - ... physical security measures will be maintained with respect to such material or facilities proposed to be exported and to any special nuclear material used in or produced through the use thereof.
Page 197 - Public Service Company of New Hampshire (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) , NRCI 75/6 857.
Page 663 - I have concluded that the reprocessing and recycling of plutonium should not proceed unless there is sound reason to conclude that the world community can effectively overcome the associated risks of proliferation.
Page 292 - Commission or presiding officer will consider: (1) Whether the moving party has made a strong showing that it is likely to prevail on the merits; (2) Whether the party will be irreparably injured unless a stay is granted; (3) Whether the granting of a stay would harm other parties; and (4) Where the public interest lies.
Page 340 - ... jeopardize the continued existence of such endangered species and threatened species or result in the destruction or modification of habitat of such species which is determined by the Secretary, after consultation as appropriate with the affected States, to be critical.