(415 p.) State regulation of railways. Prepared by the statistician [Henry C. Adams. The tabulations and original draft of the text, by Harrison S. SmalleyU.S. Government Printing Office, 1903 - Railroad law |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 95
Page 19
... Alabama , California , Florida , Georgia , Illinois , Mississippi , and South Carolina - had enacted a law in this form , and their lead was followed in the acts establishing the Texas ( 1891 ) , North Carolina ( 1891 ) , Tennessee ...
... Alabama , California , Florida , Georgia , Illinois , Mississippi , and South Carolina - had enacted a law in this form , and their lead was followed in the acts establishing the Texas ( 1891 ) , North Carolina ( 1891 ) , Tennessee ...
Page 20
... Alabama commission may “ recommend ” joint rates , while the Missouri commission is required to see that joint schedules ( for freight ) are reasonable and just . " The details which have thus far been presented are given numerical ...
... Alabama commission may “ recommend ” joint rates , while the Missouri commission is required to see that joint schedules ( for freight ) are reasonable and just . " The details which have thus far been presented are given numerical ...
Page 40
... Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas . California Colorado Connecticut Delaware .. Statute books used , and explanation of references . Martin's Code of Alabama , approved 1897 ; references to sections . S. L. to 1902 . Carter's Laws of ...
... Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas . California Colorado Connecticut Delaware .. Statute books used , and explanation of references . Martin's Code of Alabama , approved 1897 ; references to sections . S. L. to 1902 . Carter's Laws of ...
Page 46
... Alabama 1890 ..... Railroad commissioners ( 3481 ) .. Yes ( 3491 ) 1902 do . .do Arizona 1890 1891 1895 Board of railroad commissioners ( 138 ) Abolished ( 3 ) .. No ( 138 ) R. ( 3 ) 1902 Arkansas 1890 1899 Railroad commission ( 84 ) ...
... Alabama 1890 ..... Railroad commissioners ( 3481 ) .. Yes ( 3491 ) 1902 do . .do Arizona 1890 1891 1895 Board of railroad commissioners ( 138 ) Abolished ( 3 ) .. No ( 138 ) R. ( 3 ) 1902 Arkansas 1890 1899 Railroad commission ( 84 ) ...
Page 47
... Alabama . Arizona . Arkansas . California . Colorado . Connecticut . Commission may direct attorney - gen- eral or State's attorneys to bring suit ( 2293 , 2304 ) ; sheriffs must serve pro- cess of commission ( 2298 ) . Repealed ( 109 ) ...
... Alabama . Arizona . Arkansas . California . Colorado . Connecticut . Commission may direct attorney - gen- eral or State's attorneys to bring suit ( 2293 , 2304 ) ; sheriffs must serve pro- cess of commission ( 2298 ) . Repealed ( 109 ) ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
aid of strike Alabama Alaska Annually Arizona Arkansas bonds capital stock Colorado commis commissioner companies CONCERNING PENALTIES-Continued Connecticut construct within legal court Delaware directors Dist domestic railroad employees failure to construct Florida forbidden Foreign corporations Foreign railroads Forfeiture by failure freight Georgia grade Hampshire highway crossings Idaho Illinois Indian Territory Iowa Jersey judicial sale Kansas Kentucky lease legal time limits Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota mission Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada North Carolina Ohio Oklahoma operation OPERATION-Continued Oregon panies passenger cars Pennsylvania provisions relative quired railroad commissions railroad corporations railroad crossings railroads may consolidate Railroads must keep regulate Repealed Rhode Island ROAD INCORPORATION-Continued secretary sion South Dakota stations statutes stockholders Table V.-CONDITIONS Table XI.-STATUTORY PROVISIONS Tennessee Texas tickets tion tracks train two-thirds stock Utah V.-CONDITIONS OF RAIL Vermont VIII vote of two-thirds West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming
Popular passages
Page 347 - ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS CALIFORNIA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE DIST. OF COLUMBIA FLORIDA GEORGIA HAWAII IDAHO ILLINOIS INDIANA IOWA KANSAS KENTUCKY LOUISIANA MAINE MARYLAND MASSACHUSETTS MICHIGAN MINNESOTA MISSISSIPPI MISSOURI MONTANA NEBRASKA...
Page 51 - New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Page 357 - Delaware District of Columbia Florida . Georgia Idaho . Illinois . Indiana Indian Territory Iowa Kansas . Kentucky Louisiana Maine . Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi...
Page 26 - ... make such order respecting the same as may be conducive to the interests of the city.
Page 31 - ... is to engage, and if the board shall determine that the business or undertaking is one for which a corporation may lawfully be formed, and that the applicants are acting in good faith, the application shall be granted, and a certificate setting forth that the application has been approved shall be indorsed...
Page 35 - At present the commission of pharmacy consists of three persons appointed by the governor for a term of six years.
Page 26 - Institute, and, by that name, to remain in perpetual succession, with full power to sue and be sued, to plead and be impleaded, to acquire, hold, and convey property, real and personal...
Page 54 - The executive department consists of the governor, secretary of state, auditor, treasurer, attorney-general and superintendent of public instruction, all of whom are elected for four years.
Page 56 - There shall be established in the state of Nebraska, a board to be styled the Nebraska State Board of Pharmacy. Said board shall consist of the attorney general, secretary of state, auditor, treasurer, and commissioner of public lands and buildings, and said board shall appoint five (5) examiners, or secretaries, who shall be skillful retail apothecaries, of seven (7) years...
Page 32 - ... administrative. It is unnecessary, however, to do so in this case, for it is immaterial whether the powers of that court, so called, aside from those that are judicial, are of the one character or of the other, or are a blending of both. A court does not (to use the language of the act) "classify freight," nor "require the construction and maintenance of depots, switches, side tracks, stock yards, cars, and other facilities for the public convenience," nor "regulate crossings and intersections...