Page images
PDF
EPUB

8. Downstream Petroleum

U.S. Refining

For the U.S. refining industry, the year 1974 marked the end of a post-war boom. The stable crude oil input prices and steadily growing refined product demand that characterized the U.S. refining industry during the late 1940's, and through the 1950's and 1960's, were greatly altered beginning with the Arab Oil Embargo in late 1973. In contrast to the years preceding the Arab Oil Embargo, the experience of the last 20 years has included volatile crude oil prices, wide swings in product demand, changing crude oil input and product specifications, and greater Government intervention. Over the last two decades, the market structure, investment behavior, rate of technological advancement, and the financial performance of petroleum refining in the United States have undergone considerable change.

Although the substantial price hikes attending the Arab Oil Embargo and its aftermath did have the effect of reducing U.S. petroleum consumption, the effect was short-lived. In the United States, petroleum consumption initially fell in 1974 and, as economic recession took hold, declined again in 1975. From 1976 to 1978, however, the volume of refined products supplied to U.S. consumers increased 16 percent,219 reflecting a resumption of economic growth and generally flat or declining petroleum product prices. For example, residential heating oil prices in 1978 (adjusted for inflation) were a mere 1 percent above the 1974 level and the real price of leaded gasoline fell 12 percent during the same period.220 Similar patterns were evident abroad. Outside the United States, petroleum consumption in non-Communist nations rose 13 percent between 1975 and 1978.221

The bulk of increased U.S. petroleum consumption during this period was supplied largely from refineries other than those of the majors. Although the FRS companies supplied nearly 90 percent of U.S. refinery output in 1975, they accounted for only a third of the

growth in U.S. refinery output between 1975 and 1978, while the output of non-FRS refineries nearly doubled (Table 42). Even in the context of the oil price escalations following the Iranian revolution in late 1978, and subsequent decline in U.S. refined product consumption, the output of non-FRS refiners changed little as the FRS companies bore almost the entire reduction in petroleum demand.

The disproportionate growth of non-FRS refiners was an effect of Federal petroleum price regulations, particularly the "small-refiner bias" built into these regulations. In November 1974, the crude oil entitlements program was established to eliminate disparities in crude oil acquisition costs between refiners who had favorable access to price-controlled crude oil and those who did not. The U.S. Congress further required larger refiners (those with more than 175 thousand barrels per day (mbd) of crude oil throughput) to, in effect, make payments to small refiners that more than equalized crude oil acquisition costs. The objective of this requirement was to maintain the viability of small, independent refiners.

By 1980, the entitlements program had lowered the actual cost of crude oil to non-FRS refiners relative to FRS companies by more than $3 per barrel.222 Accordingly, many small refiners expanded while other enterprises built refineries in order to take advantage of the entitlements program. Non-FRS crude oil distillation capacity grew by over 60 percent from before the Arab Oil Embargo until 1978. So powerful was the attraction of the small-refiner bias that even with U.S. petroleum demand declining by 1.8 million barrels per day (mmbd) between 1978 and 1980, the capacity of nonFRS refiners was nearly 1 mmbd greater in 1980 than in 1978.223 Petroleum price regulations and the smallrefiner bias were terminated in January, 1981, eight months ahead of their scheduled expiration, with the result that non-FRS refinery capacity declined by 26 percent between 1980 and 1981.

219 Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook, 1992, DOE/EIA-0384(92) (Washington, DC, June 1993), Table 5.11. 220Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook, 1992, DOE/EIA-0384(92) (Washington, DC, June 1993), Table 5.22. 221Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook, 1992, DOE/EIA-0384(92) (Washington, DC, June 1993), Table 11.10. 222Energy Information Administration, Energy Company Development Patterns in the Postembargo Era, (DOE/EIA-0349/1) (Washington, DC, October 1982), Table 32. 223 Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook, 1992, DOE/EIA-0384(92) (Washington, DC, June 1993), Tables 5.1 and 5.9, and EIA Form-28.

Table 42. Refining Statistics for FRS Companies and U.S. Industry, Selected Years, 1975-1981 (Million Barrels/Day)

[blocks in formation]

Note: Sum of components may not equal total due to independent rounding. United States includes Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Source: Energy Information Administration, Energy Company Development Patterns in the Postembargo Era, DOE/EIA-0349) (Washington, DC, October 1982), Table 30.

With the oil price escalations from late 1978 through early 1981, U.S. petroleum demand fell by 15 percent. Refinery output in the United States, after reaching an all-time peak of 16.8 mmbd in 1978 fell to 14.0 mmbd in 1981, with the bulk of the reduction in output traceable to the FRS refiners.224 Nevertheless, FRS capital expenditures for U.S. refining rose sharply between 1977 and 1982 (Figure 32). Over the same period, the net value of assets per unit of FRS crude oil distillation capacity increased from $759 per daily barrel of capacity to $1,436 (Figure 33).

Clearly, the FRS companies were making investments in U.S. refining but not for expansion of basic capacity. Shifts in the composition of crude oil supplies, the composition of petroleum product demand, and environmental legislation largely underlay the surge in the FRS companies' investment during the 1977 to 1982 period-despite the general erosion in overall refined product demand and the workings of the small-refiner bias.

By 1985, the volume of products supplied by U.S. refineries was lower than in 1981.225 However, the

[blocks in formation]

224 Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook, 1992, DOE/EIA-0384(92) (Washington, DC, June 1993), Table 5.11, and Form EIA-28.

225 Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook, 1992, DOE/EIA-0384(92) (Washington, DC, June 1993), Table 5.11.

[blocks in formation]

Over the course of the last two decades, the refining industry has confronted heavier, more sulfurous crude oil supplies. Lighter (high gravity) and sweeter (low sulfur content) crude oils are easier and less costly to process than are heavy or sour crude oils. API gravity is a frequently used measure of a particular crude oil's gravity and provides one indication of the deterioration of refinery crude oil feedstocks over time. For instance, the average API gravity of crude oil inputs to U.S. refineries, which averaged 33.75 in 1981, had fallen to 31.30 in 1993 (Figure 34). At the same time, the availability of sweeter crude oil declined. In 1981, the average sulfur content of crude oil to U.S. refineries was 0.88 per barrel, while in 1993 sulfur content averaged 1.15 percent (Figure 35).

While the quality of refinery crude oil feedstocks diminished over the last two decades, refined product

Figure 34. Gravity of Crude-Oil Inputs to U.S.
Refineries, 1981-1993

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Source: Energy Information Administration, Petroleum Supply Annual, Volume 1, DOE/EIA-0340 (various issues) (Washington, DC), Table 16.

226 As swing producer, the Saudis had carried the full burden of any OPEC accommodation towards changes in world oil demand by adjusting Saudi production. In part, due to frustration resulting from overproduction by other OPEC members, the Saudis abandoned their role as swing producer and adopted netback pricing. While the details of netback pricing differ for each transaction, the essential ingredient was the assurance to the buying refinery of a profit margin when the crude was refined.

227 Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook, 1992, DOE/EIA-0384(92) (Washington, DC, June 1993), Table 5.11. 228 Energy Information Administration, Monthly Energy Review, January 1991, DOE/EIA-0035(91/01) (Washington, DC, January 1991), Table 9.1, and The Historical Monthly Energy Review, 1973-1988 DOE/EIA-0035(73-88) (Washington, DC, September 1991), Table 9.1.

[blocks in formation]

output shifted toward lighter end products due to the changing composition of product demand (Figure 36) and environmental mandates. Two indicators of refinery sophistication are the ratio of gasoline-related capacity to distillation capacity and the ratio of heavy/sour crude oil capacity to distillation capacity. In 1974, the FRS companies' ratio of gasoline-related capacity to distillation capacity was 56 percent (Table 43). By 1993, this ratio for the FRS companies had risen to 80 percent. The ability to process heavy fuels also improved over the past two decades as the FRS company ratio of heavy crude oil capacity to distillation capacity rose from 22 percent in 1974 to 47 percent in 1993.

Government Interventions and Regulatory Issues

The 1970's saw a significant increase in Federal Government intervention into the petroleum industry. The interventions deepened during the 1980's and 1990's. As noted earlier, preserving small refiners was one motivation for intervention. Others were concerns related to environmental protection, energy security, energy conservation, and consumer protection.

The reduction of lead additives in gasoline resulting from the Clean Air Act of 1970 (CAA) was one of the earliest major Federal Government environmental

Note: Sums may not equal 100 percent due to independent rounding. Source: Energy Information Administration, Annual Petroleum Review, 1993, DOE/EIA-0384(93) (Washington, DC, July 1994), Table 5.8.

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »