386 U.S. March 13, 1967. SHAW v. CALIFORNIA. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 52, Misc. Decided March 13, 1967. Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Valerian J. Lavernoich for petitioner. Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18. MR. JUSTICE STEWART Would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42. 386 U.S. March 13, 1967. BOYDEN v. CALIFORNIA. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 57, Misc. Decided March 13, 1967. 237 Cal. App. 2d 695, 47 Cal. Rptr. 136, vacated and remanded. Appellant pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Jack K. Weber, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18. MR. JUSTICE STEWART Would vacate the judgment and remand for reconsideration in light of the views stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42. 386 U.S. March 13, 1967. ROY v. CALIFORNIA ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 68, Misc. Decided March 13, 1967. Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18. MR. JUSTICE STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42. 386 U.S. March 13, 1967. MCCLELLAN v. CALIFORNIA. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 69, Misc. Decided March 13, 1967. Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18. MR. JUSTICE STEWART Would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42. 386 U.S. March 13, 1967. DAVIS v. CALIFORNIA. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 157, Misc. Decided March 13, 1967. Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Edward P. O'Brien and James A. Aiello, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18. MR. JUSTICE STEWART Would grant certiorari, vacate the judgment, and remand for reconsideration in light of the views stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42. |