386 U.S. March 13, 1967. WHEATON v. CALIFORNIA. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 46. Decided March 13, 1967. Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Byron J. Walters for petitioner. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and C. Anthony Collins, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in the light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18. MR. JUSTICE STEWART Would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42. WACKENHUT CORP. ET AL. v. APONTE, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO. Affirmed. No. 726. Decided March 13, 1967. Donald M. Hall for Wackenhut Corp. et al., and William B. Graves for Marvil International Security Services, Inc., appellants. J. B. Fernandez Badillo, Solicitor General of Puerto Rico, and Peter Ortiz, Assistant Solicitor General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. CITY OF GALVESTON ET AL. v. UNITED APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 827. Decided March 13, 1967.* 257 F. Supp. 243, affirmed. Harold E. Spencer and Nuel D. Belnap for appellants in No. 827. Don McDevitt, Sterling W. Steves, Harvey Huston and Milton E. Nelson, Jr., for appellants in No. 828. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Irwin A. Seibel, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al. in both cases. Frank A. Leffingwell for appellees Nueces County Navigation District No. 1 et al. in both cases. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. *Together with No. 828, Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same court. 386 U.S. March 13, 1967 LOUISIANA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Affirmed. No. 938. Decided March 13, 1967. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and Thomas W. McFerrin and William P. Schuler, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Doar and Alan G. Marer for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for hearing. 386 U.S. March 13, 1967. DAUGHERTY v. CALIFORNIA. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 19, Misc. Decided March 13, 1967. Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and C. Anthony Collins, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18. MR. JUSTICE STEWART Would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42. |