Munitions Industry: September 4-6, 1934. Electric Boat CoU.S. Government Printing Office, 1935 - Defense industries |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2922
... paid back to the Government in the form of taxes . That is correct . Senator BARBOUR . This might be subject to an excess - profits tax ? Mr. Hiss . That is correct . We do not have information at this time as to how much was paid back ...
... paid back to the Government in the form of taxes . That is correct . Senator BARBOUR . This might be subject to an excess - profits tax ? Mr. Hiss . That is correct . We do not have information at this time as to how much was paid back ...
Page 2957
... paid for at 5 cents if the construction had not been completed in that time specified , but the construction was completed . Mr. Hiss . Just a minute . You mean after the 6 months period , if you had not finished construction until ...
... paid for at 5 cents if the construction had not been completed in that time specified , but the construction was completed . Mr. Hiss . Just a minute . You mean after the 6 months period , if you had not finished construction until ...
Page 3143
... paid to you the sum of five ( 5 ) cents per pound for all smokeless powder delivered and accepted . At the end of ... paid or incurred to the date of such termination or revocation , a sum which , together with all moneys theretofore ...
... paid to you the sum of five ( 5 ) cents per pound for all smokeless powder delivered and accepted . At the end of ... paid or incurred to the date of such termination or revocation , a sum which , together with all moneys theretofore ...
Page 3175
... paid for it . Mr. Hiss . Will you also notice on page 2 the price paid for cotton linters in 1917 at 14 cents a pound , which was very high , was it not ? Did your company pay anything like that for cotton linters in 1917 ? Mr. IRÉNÉE ...
... paid for it . Mr. Hiss . Will you also notice on page 2 the price paid for cotton linters in 1917 at 14 cents a pound , which was very high , was it not ? Did your company pay anything like that for cotton linters in 1917 ? Mr. IRÉNÉE ...
Page 3196
... paid for these properties in 1904. They paid a great deal more than that , because we had to pay for their earning power at that time , which had all been absorbed in previous years . They had built up a goodwill and " know - how " and ...
... paid for these properties in 1904. They paid a great deal more than that , because we had to pay for their earning power at that time , which had all been absorbed in previous years . They had built up a goodwill and " know - how " and ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amount ANDERSON audit Cannon powder capital stock CARNDUFF centage for 1916 CHAIRMAN charges Chicago Cleveland Coal Colonel HULL committee construction and operation contractor cost cotton Department of Justice Detroit du Pont Engineering ducting tax E. I. du Pont earnings for 1917 Excess expenditures expense Foundry freight GREGG GUISE Guncotton guns Hiss Industries Board investigation IRÉNÉE DU PONT KILEEN letter Lieutenant Colonel HARRIS Lieutenant CUTTS linters Machine Major Farr manufacture marked Exhibit Mason & Hanger materials MCLANE ment months Name of corporation Nashville Nemours & Company net income October Ohio Old Hickory Ordnance Department paid paragraph payment PEEBLES Percent Philadelphia PIERRE DU PONT Pont Company Pont de Nemours Pont Engineering Company powder plant profit purchased question records referred Secretary Secretary of War Senator CLARK Serial number smokeless powder statement Steel vouchers War Department War Industries Board WILLIAMS Wilmington YOUMANS