Page images
PDF
EPUB

signs which indicate the occurrence of a magnetic storm. 'It was found,' says Dr. Balfour Stewart, 'that a magnetic disturbance had broken out at the very moment when this singular appearance had been observed.' But this was not all. A magnetic storm never rages without accompanying signs of disturbance. Auroras in both hemispheres, and the interruption of magnetic communication all over the Earth, are the signs of a great magnetic storm. Both these evidences of great disturbance were afforded during the hours which followed the solar outbreak witnessed by Carrington and Hodgson. Vivid auroras were seen not only in both hemispheres, but in latitudes where auroras are very seldom witnessed. seldom witnessed. Even in Cuba the sky was illuminated by the auroral radiance. Strong earth-currents were observed along telegraphic lines, and these currents continually changed their direction, while all the time the magnetic needles in fixed observatories were kept markedly on one side of their normal position. By degrees,' says Sir John Herschel,* accounts began to pour in of great auroras seen on the nights of those days, not only in these latitudes but at Rome; in the West Indies; on the tropics within 18° of the equator (where they hardly ever

* I have been careful, it will be noticed, to quote the words of many authorities in dealing with this matter. The account I gave in my Other Worlds than Ours has been spoken of as though it had been based on imagination; so that I have thought it well to re-examine the records and statements from which the account was really taken (though by the aid of memory instead of transcription). Although several years had elapsed since I read those statements, I do not find that my account required correction in a single essential particular.

appear); nay, what is still more striking, in South America and in Australia,-where, at Melbourne, on the night of September 2, the greatest aurora ever seen there made its appearance. These auroras were accompanied with unusually great electro-magnetic disturbances in every part of the world. In many places the telegraph wires struck work. They had too many private messages of their own to convey. At Washington and Philadelphia, in America, the telegraphic signal-men received severe electric shocks. At a station in Norway, the telegraphic apparatus was set fire to; and at Boston, in North America, a flame of fire followed the pen of Bain's electric telegraph (which writes down the message upon chemicallyprepared paper).'

It is demonstrated then that some association exists between the disturbance of the solar photosphere and the phenomena of terrestrial magnetism. What the nature of the association may be is not so clearly apparent. We have seen that the solar spot period has been supposed to be associated by Wolf with the motions of the planets, and we shall presently see that the phenomena of spots,-as their change of form and of size, the regions in which they appear, and so on,-have been conceived to depend on the planetary motions. If these views be correct, we should have to account for laws of association between the planetary motions, terrestrial magnetism, and solar spots. But, which of these three orders of phenomena should be regarded as the cause of the others; or whether the association be of the

nature of cause and effect, and not rather due to some as yet unknown common cause of the two latter classes of phenomena; or whether, finally, the planets' motions, without being the direct cause of the other phenomena, yet indirectly bring them about, remains to be determined.*

Let us next turn to Mr. Carrington's researches, intimately associated with Schwabe's, and among the most important of all the contributions which have been made in recent times to our acquaintance with solar physics.

The object to which Mr. Carrington specially devoted his energies was the endeavour to detect regularity in the distribution of the spots, the determination of the true period of rotation of the body of the

If,

*I would point out, however, that the consideration of the association here discussed led General Sabine, Professor Challis, and Dr. Stewart to inquire whether the coloured prominences of the Sun may not be due to solar auroras. Since we now know that the prominences are not of this nature, may we not transfer the suggestion to the solar corona and the zodiacal light? May not these be the true solar auroras? The latter, at any rate, gives the same spectrum as the aurora, and the former gives a spectrum closely analogous. as General Sabine suggests, an auroral outburst in the Sun may perhaps be responded to simultaneously by the different planets, so that the whole solar system would seem to thrill almost like a living being under the magnetic excitement,' it seems at least probable that the solar auroras would extend to distances enormously exceeding those assigned them when the prominences were taken to be such auroras. And as we have abundant evidence that terrestrial auroras occur where the atmosphere has an inconceivable rarity, it would seem possible that under the enormous action of the Sun, even the quasi-vacuum of the interplanetary spaces might be traversed by electrical discharges. The meteoric systems occupying more or less densely the whole of these spaces, would seem to afford the requisite channel for this electric

action.

P

[ocr errors]

Sun, and the detection of systematic movements or currents of the surface, if such existed in a definable manner.' In these researches he perfectly succeeded.

It would be desirable if space permitted to describe Carrington's method of observation, and the exact and systematic processes by which he deduced his results. I must be content, however, so far as these points are concerned, to refer the curious reader to Carrington's voluminous and masterly treatise, in which also will be found an interesting account of the results obtained by former observers. Here I have room only for the conclusions to which he was led by his series of observations, which commenced in the year 1853 and ended in the year 1861.

He discovered, in the first place, that the discrepancies between the values formerly deduced for the Sun's rotation, arise from real differences in the velocities with which the spots move in different solar latitudes. Near the equator a spot moves at a rate indicating a more rapid rotation than in higher latitudes. Further, even among spots in the same latitude, proper motions may be recognized. These latter motions are to be regarded, however, as abnormal, and simply rendering unreliable such observations as are made on but a few spots. The peculiarities affecting the motions of spots in different latitudes have been reduced by Mr. Carrington into a formula.* The following table

This formula is as follows:-Let & be the angle through which a part of the Sun in latitude à rotates in one day. Then

= 14° 25′ — 165' sin A.

gives the observed rates of rotation for different latitudes (the formula being based on these values):–

Sun's rotation-period.

[ocr errors]

Rotation per day.

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

= 16°.8475 - 3°.3812 (sin λ + 41° 13').

* It is remarkable that in all southern latitudes the observed daily mean rotation is less than in the corresponding northern latitudes. It is doubtful whether we have in this relation any indication of the true cause of the observed variations in the rate of rotation, or merely a peculiarity which would have disappeared in a long series of observations. In favour of the former view, we have the consideration that the determination for each southern as well as for each northern latitude was independently effected, so that the coincidence of the results ndicates the existence of some real cause. If Sir John Herschel is ight in considering that the more rapid rotation near the solar equator implies the action of external matter in maintaining the rotation of the photosphere, it may be suggested that the northern surface of the Sun being directed somewhat more fully towards that region whither the Sun's proper motion is carrying him (see the concluding chapter of this work, and the illustrative cuts), would probably be more exposed to the influence of this external action-'the frictional impulse of circulating planetary matter in process of subsidence into, and absorption by, the central body'-much as our northern hemisphere is saluted with a large number of meteoric missiles from June to December, when the northern hemisphere is in advance, then from December to June, when this hemisphere is towards the more sheltered side of the Earth.

« PreviousContinue »