Improving the AEC Regulatory Process: March 1961. 75 p. (87th Congress, 1st Session. Joint committee print)U.S. Government Printing Office, 1961 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
... decision and , at this point , the process enters the fifth , or " final action phase . " The hearing examiner's initial decision becomes final unless the Commission , on exceptions by the applicant , the staff , or an intervenor , or ...
... decision and , at this point , the process enters the fifth , or " final action phase . " The hearing examiner's initial decision becomes final unless the Commission , on exceptions by the applicant , the staff , or an intervenor , or ...
Page 19
... decision before final action is taken . Although the public record does not so indicate , the Commission has advised the JCAE staff that the Commissioners review the record in every case heard by a hearing examiner , whether or not ...
... decision before final action is taken . Although the public record does not so indicate , the Commission has advised the JCAE staff that the Commissioners review the record in every case heard by a hearing examiner , whether or not ...
Page 22
... decision in a reactor licensing case . Moreover , except on procedural issues , the applicants have not attempted to ... decision which becomes final unless the Commission , on exceptions by the applicant , the staff , or an intervenor ...
... decision in a reactor licensing case . Moreover , except on procedural issues , the applicants have not attempted to ... decision which becomes final unless the Commission , on exceptions by the applicant , the staff , or an intervenor ...
Page 28
... decision . Negotiations on the contract to provide AEC research and develop- ment assistance to PRDC continued apace before and after the hear- ing commenced in January , 1957 , until the contract was signed on March 26 , 1957 . On ...
... decision . Negotiations on the contract to provide AEC research and develop- ment assistance to PRDC continued apace before and after the hear- ing commenced in January , 1957 , until the contract was signed on March 26 , 1957 . On ...
Page 31
... decision by the Court of Appeals in this case interprets sec- tions 182 , 185 , and 189 of the Atomic Energy Act , with consequences potentially affecting the entire AEC regulatory process . The decision may cast in doubt , insofar as ...
... decision by the Court of Appeals in this case interprets sec- tions 182 , 185 , and 189 of the Atomic Energy Act , with consequences potentially affecting the entire AEC regulatory process . The decision may cast in doubt , insofar as ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
ACRS meeting ACRS report action activities administrative Administrative Procedure Act Advisory Committee AEC regulatory AEC staff AEC's agency Application Amendment approval Atomic Energy Act Atomic Energy Commission authority Board Boiling Water Reactor byproduct material Commission's Committee on Reactor Commonwealth Edison Construction Events construction permit Counsel Director Division of Compliance Division of Licensing Docket Electric Federal Register filed final hazards analysis hazards evaluation hazards summary report health and safety hearing examiner inspection intermediate decision involved Isotopes issuance issued JCAE Joint Committee Licensing and Regulation material license matters ment nuclear reactor Office of Health operating license organization personnel power reactor PRDC problems procedures proceedings proposed public hearing pursuant radiation protection radioactive Reactor Development reactor licensing Reactor Safeguards reactor safety regulatory process regulatory program request responsibilities rulemaking rules separation sion source material special nuclear material supra test reactors tion utilization facilities