Cases not Otherwise Reported. No. 911. ARNOLD v. CHESEBROUGH. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. April 23, 1894: Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Mr. John H. V. Arnold for appellants. Mr. Walter S. Logan and Mr. Charles M. Demond for appellees. No. 1152. ARNOLD V. CHESEBROUGH. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. March 26, 1894: Petition denied. Mr. Roger Foster, Mr. Joseph H. Choate, and Mr. J. H. V. Arnold, for Arnold et al., in support of petition. Mr. Walter S. Logan, for Chesebrough et al., in opposition thereto. No. 44. ARTHUR'S EXECUTORS v. CONSTABLE, and No. 45. CONSTABLE v. ARTHUR'S EXECUTORS. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. October 16, 1893: Judgment reversed, per stipulation, and cause remanded to be proceeded in according to law. Mr. Attorney General for Arthur's Executors. Mr. Stephen G. Clarke and Mr. Edwin B. Smith for Constable et al. Error to the No. 46. ARTHUR'S EXECUTORS v. CONSTABLE. Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. October 16, 1893: Judgment reversed, with costs, per stipulation, and cause remanded to be proceeded in according to law. Mr. Attorney General for Arthur's Executors. Mr. Stephen G. Clarke and Mr. Edwin B. Smith for Constable et al. No. 1. ASHEnfelter v. TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO ex rel. WADE. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of New Mexico. October 18, 1893: Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for appellant on motion of Mr. Lawrence Maxwell, Jr., in behalf of counsel. Mr. Henry L. Warren, Mr. S. W. Pennypacker, and Mr. C. W. McKeehan for appellant. Mr. C. II. Armes for appellee. Cases not Otherwise Reported. No. 953. ASPLEY V. MURPHY. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. November 6, 1893: Petition denied. Mr. A. H. Garland, for Aspley, in support of petition. Mr. F. M. Etheridge and Mr. W. P. Ellison, for Murphy et al., in opposition thereto. V. No. 1095. BAILEY . SUNDBERG. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. January 15, 1894: Petition denied. Mr. George A. Black, for Bailey et al., in support of petition. No one opposing. No. 611. BAIN v. UNITED STATES. Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio. November 27, 1893: Dismissed, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. G. H. Wald for plaintiff in error. Mr. Attorney General for defendant in error. No. 250. BARNETT v. CITY OF DENISON. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas. February 1, 1894: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. Sawnie Robertson for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. No. 168. BAY CITY STREET RAILWAY COMPANY v. TAYLOR. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan. December 12, 1893: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. H. H. Hatch for plaintiff in error. Mr. T. A. E Weadock for defendants in error. No. 881. BELMONT PLANTING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. SCOTT. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. October 18, 1893: Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for appellant. Mr. E. H. Farrar, Mr. Benjamin F. Jonas, and Mr. E. B. Kruttschnitt for appellant. Mr. Henry P. Dart for appellee. Cases not Otherwise Reported. No. 1165. BENTON, alias NEWBY, v. UNITED STATES. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois. March 30, 1894: Docketed and dismissed on motion of Mr. Assistant Attorney General Dodge for appellee. No one opposing. No. 513. BOSTON AND MAINE RAILROAD v. RAMSEY. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. January 8, 1894: Dismissed, with costs, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. Frank W. Hackett for defendant in error. Mr. Solomon Lincoln for plaintiff in error. Mr. S. B. Allen and Mr. Frank W. Hackett for defendant in error. No. 124. BOYD v. STEDMAN. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. November 27, 1893: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. Hubert Howson for appellant. Mr. Charles Howson and Mr. Hubert Howson for appellant. Mr. Causten Browne for appellees. No. 154. BRITTON V. KLEINERT. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. December 6, 1893: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. Jerome Carty for appellant. Mr. James A. Hudson for appellee. No. 1147. BROOKS v. RAYNOLDS. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. April 23, 1894: Petition denied. Mr. Francis J. Wing, for Raynolds, in support of petition. Mr. Lawrence Maxwell, Jr., for Brooks, in opposition thereto. No. 402. BROWN v. JOLIFFE. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio. May 14, 1894: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of counsel for plaintiff in error. Mr. Edward Colston for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendants in error. Cases not Otherwise Reported. No. 693. BRUSH ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania. November 9, 1893: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. M. E. Olmsted for plaintiff in error. Mr. M. E. Olmsted for plaintiff in error. Mr. James A. Stranahan for defendant in error. No. 781. BUFORD V. TAYLOR. Error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Utah. November 8, 1893: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of counsel for plaintiffs in error. Mr. John A. Marshall for plaintiffs in error. No appearance for defendants in error. No. 806. BUFORD v. UNITED STATES. Error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Utah. November 8, 1893: Dismissed, on motion of counsel for plaintiffs in error. Mr. John A. Marshall for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Attorney General for defendant in error. No. 202. CADWALADER v. SHULTZ. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. January 3, 1894: Judgment reversed, with costs, per stipulation, and cause remanded to be proceeded in according to law, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for plaintiff in error. Mr. Attorney General for plaintiff in error. Mr. Edward L. Perkins for defendant in error. No. 333. CELLULOID MANUFACTURING COMPANY V. CELLONITE MANUFACTURING COMPANY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. March 27, 1894: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. Frederic H. Betts for appellant. Mr. John R. Bennett for appellees. No. 240. CENTRAL OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY v. COLUMError to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio. January 18, 1894: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of BUS. Cases not Otherwise Reported. counsel for plaintiffs in error. Mr. John K. Cowen and Mr. Hugh L. Bond, Jr., for plaintiffs in error. No appearance for defendants in error. No. 120. CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY v. DUFF. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Tennessee. November 24, 1893: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. Edgar M. Johnson and Mr. W. M. Baxter for appellant. No appearance for appellee. No. 153. CHICAGO, ST. PAUL AND KANSAS CITY RAILWAY COMPANY V. PIERCE. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. December 8, 1893: Judgment reversed, with costs, and cause remanded to be proceeded in according to law, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. John C. Black for defendant in error. Mr. H. A. Gardner and Mr. William McFadon for plaintiff in error. Mr. John C. Black for defendant in error. No. 1015. CHUN SHANG YUEN v. UNITED STATES. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. December 18, 1893: Dismissed, on motion of Mr. J. Hubley Ashton for appellant. Mr. J. Hubley Ashton, Mr. Joseph H. Choate, Mr. Harvey S. Brown, and Mr. Thomas D. Riordan for appellant. Mr. Attorney General for appellees. No. 372. CLARK v. SMITH. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Virginia. January 17, 1894: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of counsel for appellant. Mr. Richard C. Dale for appellant. No appearance for appellee. No. 76. CLEARFIELD BITUMINOUS COAL CORPORATION V. PENNSYLVANIA. Error to the Supreme Court of the State VOL. CLIV-32 |