An appeal to the gospel or An inquiry into the justice of the charge ... that the gospel is not preached by the national clergy: a series of discourses delivered before the University of Oxford, 1812, at the lecture founded by J. Bampton

writings of the Founders of Methodism, and of the moft eminent among those Ministers of the Establishment, who, like the profeffed Methodists, have been diftinguished (I think unduly) by the appellation of Evangelical or Gofpel Preachers. From the writings of these authors, to which have been added, as neceffary to the fame purpose, fome of the works of Auguftin and of Calvin, my quotations are neither few nor fcanty. In making them, I truft it will appear that I have acted honeftly; and that I am not anfwerable for the guilt of mifreprefenting or perverting the fentiments of others, for the benefit of my own caufe. At the fame time, it may be proper to add, that, as there are probably comprised under the general defcriptions of our accufers, many individuals, who do not fubfcribe to the opinions which their brethren have avowed, I request that my remarks may not be understood to apply to any man, farther than as he efpoufes the fentiments of those, whose works are particularly noticed,

As to my filence concerning a late publication by a learned Prelate, and the obfervations to which it has given occafion, it appears respectful to state, that the materials of the following Lectures were collected, and indeed the Lectures themselves were nearly com→ pleted in their prefent form, before the "Re

"futation of Calvinifm" was announced. For the compofition of my Difcourfes I had avail ed myself of a season of comparative leisure, which more numerous and preffing parochial engagements have fince prevented from recurring fo that, had it been my wish, it would hardly have been in my power, to devote due attention to the examination of any fresh publications. The truth however is, that it was not my wish to be indebted to so recent a production; efpecially to one, which, from the exalted ftation and well-known character of the Author, might be expected to be received into general circulation. Although by earlier works, therefore, I have endeavoured to profit, without fcruple or referve, (of which I hope that this general acknowledgment will be deemed fufficient, if at any time I have omitted to specify my obligation,) I determined to deny myself the fatisfaction, for the prefent, of reading the " Refutation," that I might at once avoid both the temptation, and the fufpicion, of being indebted to it.

Perhaps it may be thought, that I should have acted a more prudent part, if I had detlined my own attempt, on the appearance of the Bishop of Lincoln's work. Had I been apprifed of his Lordship's undertaking at an earlier period, it is moft probable that I should never have engaged in mine: or, when I first

became acquainted with that undertaking, had not my Difcourfes been defigned for a fpecific purpose, and my intention of being a candidate for that particular appointment been declared, the work would then probably have been relinquished. After all, notwithstanding the publication alluded to, if I do not magnify the importance of the Inquiry, in which I have been occupied, I am willing to think that it may not be altogether useless. The courfe of my fubject has led me to notice. fome particulars, which can hardly have entered into a "Refutation of Calvinifm:" and even with respect to thofe, which are common to both inquiries, the more fuperficial examination of the Predeftinarian fyftem, to which my limits and my abilities have confined me, may (by the bleffing of God) be not unprofitable to thofe, who have not opportunity for ftudying his Lordship's more elaborate production.

I have only to add, that being defirous of comprising the whole of my observations in the body of the work, inftead of throwing any part of them into notes, I found that moft of the following Difcourfes had run to a greater length than was adapted to the pulpit, and therefore fhortened them in the delivery.