Problems Caused by the Drought Situation (Secretary John R. Block): Hearing Before the Committee on Agriculture, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, First Session, September 21, 1983 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 68
Page 2
... farmers whose crops have been de- stroyed and we want to get the administration's view on whether any further action by Congress is needed , as well as to allow mem- bers to visit with the Secretary about the issue . [ The prepared ...
... farmers whose crops have been de- stroyed and we want to get the administration's view on whether any further action by Congress is needed , as well as to allow mem- bers to visit with the Secretary about the issue . [ The prepared ...
Page 3
... farmers , depending who they are and where they are , it can be devastating . There will be some big winners and some big losers this year in agriculture as a result of this drought . For those who have prod- ucts to sell , the recent ...
... farmers , depending who they are and where they are , it can be devastating . There will be some big winners and some big losers this year in agriculture as a result of this drought . For those who have prod- ucts to sell , the recent ...
Page 5
... farmer and the other goes for transportation , marketing , labor , and related costs . Thus , you can have an increase in the farm price of commodities prices and not affect food prices that much . For instance , looking at the ...
... farmer and the other goes for transportation , marketing , labor , and related costs . Thus , you can have an increase in the farm price of commodities prices and not affect food prices that much . For instance , looking at the ...
Page 6
... farmers request- ed to be signed up in the program , which was approximately $ 800 million . In 1983 , approximately $ 1 billion diversion payments were also made to the farmers in these States . For the 1982 price support loans we have ...
... farmers request- ed to be signed up in the program , which was approximately $ 800 million . In 1983 , approximately $ 1 billion diversion payments were also made to the farmers in these States . For the 1982 price support loans we have ...
Page 7
... Farmer's Home Administration emergency loan program . That program , and the two questions which we felt were ... farmers of America that we could handle the in- creased workload we expect next lending season - which is January to ...
... Farmer's Home Administration emergency loan program . That program , and the two questions which we felt were ... farmers of America that we could handle the in- creased workload we expect next lending season - which is January to ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
50 percent 75 million bushels acre acreage assistance BEDELL billion Bolivar County Central Illinois Corn Chairman committee commodities Commodity Credit Corporation Congressman cost cotton counties crop insurance program dairy Dakota damage determination disaster loans disaster program dollar drought economic emergency eligible emergency loan estimated EVANS of Iowa farm programs Farmers Home Administration FCIC Federal crop insurance feed grains feed program Finney County FmHA food prices Georgia going Government Governor Grain Sorghum gram HARKIN hundredweight impact indemnity Individual Yield Coverage Kansas Lesher livestock producers look Lubbock County Market Value Aug Mills County NAYLOR normal crop North Carolina Participate in PIK payment-in-kind PIK ENTITLEMENTS PIK Market Value PIK program premium price support problems reduced request Secretary BLOCK Section 107 September Sorghum South Dakota soybeans special disaster payments stocks supplies Texas Thank Virginia VOLKMER wheat yield guarantees
Popular passages
Page 46 - Secretary determines necessary in order to assure an adequate supply of pure and wholesome milk to meet current needs, reflect changes in the cost of production, and assure a level of farm income adequate to maintain productive capacity sufficient to meet anticipated future needs.
Page 46 - The price of whole milk, butterfat, and the products of such commodities, respectively, shall be supported at such level not in excess of 90 per centum nor less than 75 per centum of the parity price therefor as the Secretary determines necessary in order to assure an adequate supply.
Page 75 - New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah...
Page 76 - Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Maryland Michigan Minnesota Missouri Nebraska New Jersey New Mexico North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania South...
Page 51 - Secretary determines that: (i) As the result of drought, flood, or other natural disaster, or other condition beyond the control of the producers, producers on a farm have suffered substantial losses of production either...
Page 51 - Federal crop insurance indemnity payments and other forms of assistance made available by the Federal Government to such producers for such losses are insufficient to alleviate such economic emergency...
Page 33 - Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Agriculture shall under the provisions of this Act establish, maintain, and dispose of a separate reserve of inventories of not to exceed 75 million bushels of wheat, feed grains, and soybeans for the purpose of alleviating distress caused by a natural disaster.
Page 46 - ... commercially by producers, including producers who market milk of their own production directly to consumers. The deductions are to be remitted to the Commodity Credit Corporation to offset a portion of the cost of the dairy price support program. The Secretary's authority for requiring such deductions shall not apply for any fiscal year for which the Secretary estimates that the net price support purchases of milk or the products of milk will be less than 5 billion pounds milk equivalent. In...
Page 23 - I am thinking of a nonpar system now, what are you going to do about that? How are you going to get him out of the mud hole?
Page 78 - Louisiana Mississippi Missouri New Mexico .. .. North Carolina Oklahoma South Carolina Tennessee... Texas Virginia Total...