Military Construction, 1954: Hearings Before the Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Eighty-third Congress, Second Session |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 9
Page 12
... particular purpose ? Captain LAMB . It is designed only for the use of the Navy , sir . We cooperate with the Air Force . If they had a problem and we have sufficient room , we would certainly cooperate in every way possible to assist ...
... particular purpose ? Captain LAMB . It is designed only for the use of the Navy , sir . We cooperate with the Air Force . If they had a problem and we have sufficient room , we would certainly cooperate in every way possible to assist ...
Page 18
... particular reference to the Arnold Engineering Center . Was that given complete consideration ? Captain LAMB . Yes , sir . I think you will find that included in the conclusions of the committee , Mr. Hand , which are on page 14 of our ...
... particular reference to the Arnold Engineering Center . Was that given complete consideration ? Captain LAMB . Yes , sir . I think you will find that included in the conclusions of the committee , Mr. Hand , which are on page 14 of our ...
Page 28
... several different Defense entities , then , which will be getting some of the benefit of this $ 181,000 , and we would not be able to allocate it to any one particular place , would we ? General CARTER . No , sir . It is all 28.
... several different Defense entities , then , which will be getting some of the benefit of this $ 181,000 , and we would not be able to allocate it to any one particular place , would we ? General CARTER . No , sir . It is all 28.
Page 33
... particular site ? Colonel BREEHL . So far as the maintenance product which comes out of there is concerned , lack of an airfield facility only takes away from our ability to perform aircraft maintenance and not all of the other ...
... particular site ? Colonel BREEHL . So far as the maintenance product which comes out of there is concerned , lack of an airfield facility only takes away from our ability to perform aircraft maintenance and not all of the other ...
Page 34
... particular base . You have some flying facilities there , I am sure ? Mr. MCCLOUD . Yes , sir ; we have a limited field there . Mr. HAND . But it is inadequate for general purposes so far as flights are concerned ? Mr. McCLOUD ...
... particular base . You have some flying facilities there , I am sure ? Mr. MCCLOUD . Yes , sir ; we have a limited field there . Mr. HAND . But it is inadequate for general purposes so far as flights are concerned ? Mr. McCLOUD ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
83d Congress Abilene acres Admiral PERRY Air Force Base airbase aircraft airfield Alameda approval ASSISTANT CHIEF Assistant Secretary authorized award dates Blytheville Bureau of Aeronautics Captain LAMB CARTER Cecil Field CEDERBERG Chairman Chase Field CHIEF OF STAFF clearance Colonel BREEHL Colonel HAAS Colonel KRICKER Colonel PRICE committee in November Committee on Appropriations complete construction program DAVIS deferred depot easement engineering estimate estimated cost Fallon figure fiscal year 1954 flight facilities fueling stations funds going gunnery HAND hangar hospital House of Representatives included Indian Springs jet engine JOHN TABER Kingsville land letter maintenance McCLOUD messing facilities Middletown MILLET HAND Navy officers Okinawa Olmsted Air Force operation overhaul pipeline present projects Properties and Installations Public Law 209 Quonset Point RABAUT request requirement restudy revised schedule Scott Air Force Secretary of Defense section 805 square feet storage subcommittee supply tank target TAYLOR Trenton turboprop
Popular passages
Page 42 - Secretary's letter in the record at this point. (The letter is as follows:) DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Washington, April 11, 1941.
Page 29 - Specific projects to be constructed with the requested appropriations require the approval of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Properties and Installations and consultation with the Armed Services Committees of the Senate and of the House. The Department of the Army on January 20, 1956, forwarded projects to be constructed with the fiscal year 1957 appropriation request to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Properties and Installations for approval.
Page 37 - Base in Illinois. The letter will be inserted in the record at this point. (The letter referred to above is as follows:) APRIL 6, 1954. CHAIRMAN, COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS, House of Representatives, Washington, DC DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: Reference is made to the hearings held before your committee in November 1953 for the purpose of financing construction items authorized by Public Law 209, 83d Congress, for the Department of the Air Force.
Page 21 - Taber [May 26, 1947] New York City Honorable John Taber Chairman, Committee on Appropriations House of Representatives Washington, DC Dear Mr. Taber: I have your request for a memorandum on my views upon the recommendations of the War Department of $725,000,000 for food and collateral relief requirements for Germany, Japan and Korea for the next fiscal year. You have also requested that I should furnish you a memorandum upon the causes of these...
Page 21 - Eepresentatives and the Senate. In a letter from the chairman of the House Committee on Appropriations to the Secretary of Defense, dated November 25, 1953, approval of that committee was granted to the Department of the Army for the expenditure of $43,181,500 for the fiscal year 1954 public works construction program, as authorized by Public Law 209, 83d Congress. Construction projects totaling $22,090,500, including the Kings Bay ammunition terminal were either deleted or deferred by the committee....
Page 22 - trongly expressed his dissatlsfatcion with procurement practices which have resulted in so much noncompetitlve, or "sole source" procurement by the Department of Defense. He has directed that steps be taken to reduce noncompetitive procurement to the minimum. I am attaching for your information a copy of a memorandum from the Assistant Secretary of Defense (T. & L.) on this subject. 2. I am in complete agreement with the Secretary of Defense's feeling in this matter, since I am convinced that only...