International Wheat Agreement Funds: Hearings Before a Subcommittee of ..., 81-1 on S. 2287 and S. 2383 ..., September 21 and 22, 1949 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 5
Page 12
Mr . TRIGG . Did I understand you to mean there that nothing could stop the
Canadian wheat grower from increasing his acreage , or our wheat growers ?
Senator Young . No , the Canadians . They have no wheat acreage control
program , as ...
Mr . TRIGG . Did I understand you to mean there that nothing could stop the
Canadian wheat grower from increasing his acreage , or our wheat growers ?
Senator Young . No , the Canadians . They have no wheat acreage control
program , as ...
Page 24
Senator HOLLAND . I mean as to this particular item . Was that cut off ? Dr .
FITZGERALD . Yes , it was cut off in this way . It was reduced specifically by the
House Appropriations Subcommittee . Then the House full committee and the
House ...
Senator HOLLAND . I mean as to this particular item . Was that cut off ? Dr .
FITZGERALD . Yes , it was cut off in this way . It was reduced specifically by the
House Appropriations Subcommittee . Then the House full committee and the
House ...
Page 30
It appears that this subsection can be interpreted to mean , by omitting the central
clause between commas : The President is hereby further authorized to take such
other action as may be necessary in his judgment in the implementation of the ...
It appears that this subsection can be interpreted to mean , by omitting the central
clause between commas : The President is hereby further authorized to take such
other action as may be necessary in his judgment in the implementation of the ...
Page 52
Triple damages , in terms of a cargo of wheat , would mean a penalty of nearly $
2 , 000 , 000 . The remote possibility of such a forfeiture cannot be said to
encourage exports . We believe the penalty is more than an “ effective sanction ”
to ...
Triple damages , in terms of a cargo of wheat , would mean a penalty of nearly $
2 , 000 , 000 . The remote possibility of such a forfeiture cannot be said to
encourage exports . We believe the penalty is more than an “ effective sanction ”
to ...
Page 52
Triple damages , in terms of a cargo of wheat , would mean a penalty of nearly $
2 , 000 , 000 . The remote possibility of such a forfeiture cannot be said to
encourage exports . We believe the penalty is more than an effective sanction ” to
...
Triple damages , in terms of a cargo of wheat , would mean a penalty of nearly $
2 , 000 , 000 . The remote possibility of such a forfeiture cannot be said to
encourage exports . We believe the penalty is more than an effective sanction ” to
...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acreage action Administration agency agree already amended amount appears appropriation August authority believe benefits bill bushels carry Chairman charged Committee Commodity Credit Corporation concerned Congress controls cost Council countries course Department difference dollars domestic ECA countries Economic Cooperation effect export exports wheat extent FAKLER FITZGERALD funds Government Grain hearings House implement import imposed international wheat agreement issued July legislation limited losses market price maximum mean ment necessary obligations operations paid payments penalty permit person possible present President proposed provisions purchases pursuant quantities question quotas reason recommendation record reduced reference regulations relating request Sanford savings Secretary of Agriculture Senator HOLLAND Senator JOHNSTON Senator Young statement subcommittee subsidy supplies tion trade TRIGG understand United wheat and wheat wheat flour wheat or wheat